ue paranoia about license terms, but when they are so
close to widely-used licenses in main, it makes me wonder how much
diligence went into the arguments.
[1]- Relative to the others, the Dawes/X-Oz licenses adds "sublicense"
to the list of rights granted.
Michael Poole
chnologies"
license[1] has the same problematic advertising clause as the XFree86
License version 1.1[2]; perhaps the disagreement over Freeness is due
to confusion about which "X-Oz Technologies" license applies?
[1]- http://www.xfree86.org/~dawes/pre-4.4/LICENSE6.html#27
[2]- http://www.xfree86.org/~dawes/pre-4.4/LICENSE4.html#7
Michael Poole
(Disclaimer: I am neither a lawyer nor Debian developer.)
2 matches
Mail list logo
