Hi,
Am Freitag, 05. September 2003 10:39 schrieb Branden Robinson:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:17:25PM +0200, Malte Cornils wrote:
> > when choosing a window manager like twm with kdm or wdm (maybe also
> > others, but not xdm), this window manager is executed without taking into
Hi,
Am Freitag, 05. September 2003 10:39 schrieb Branden Robinson:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:17:25PM +0200, Malte Cornils wrote:
> > when choosing a window manager like twm with kdm or wdm (maybe also
> > others, but not xdm), this window manager is executed without taking into
Hello,
when choosing a window manager like twm with kdm or wdm (maybe also others,
but not xdm), this window manager is executed without taking into account the
user .xsession.
The user .xsession is only taken into account when using the default "window
manager".
By the way, some of the mor
Hello,
when choosing a window manager like twm with kdm or wdm (maybe also others,
but not xdm), this window manager is executed without taking into account the
user .xsession.
The user .xsession is only taken into account when using the default "window
manager".
By the way, some of the mor
Hello Manfred, hello Branden, hello *,
I'll try to translate this request for help.
On Saturday, 8. March 2003 00:49, Manfred Storch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I do not know if this is the right place to ask, but I will try.
>
> After configuration with XF86Config, the new settings are supposed to be
>
Hello Manfred, hello Branden, hello *,
I'll try to translate this request for help.
On Saturday, 8. March 2003 00:49, Manfred Storch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I do not know if this is the right place to ask, but I will try.
>
> After configuration with XF86Config, the new settings are supposed to be
>
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:19:20PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 2. It might be interesting to develop either colorized vim or emacs
> > modes that were invoked when editing only-partially-editable files, such
> > that the "hands-off" part appeared, say, in some distinct color.
>
> A ni
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:19:20PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 2. It might be interesting to develop either colorized vim or emacs
> > modes that were invoked when editing only-partially-editable files, such
> > that the "hands-off" part appeared, say, in some distinct color.
>
> A ni
Branden Robinson wrote:
>>hmm, I had the same problem - with [EMAIL PROTECTED] set in
>>/etc/environment at least. Installing the -transcoded packages
>>fixed this. (of course, the transcoded fonts *are* useful in this
>>case)
> Yes, the -transcoded packages are important for people using
> char
Branden Robinson wrote:
>>hmm, I had the same problem - with LANG=de_DE@euro set in
>>/etc/environment at least. Installing the -transcoded packages
>>fixed this. (of course, the transcoded fonts *are* useful in this
>>case)
> Yes, the -transcoded packages are important for people using
>
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 08:36:51PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
Is there a way to get twm or fvwm start without -transcoded?
Yes; I do it all the time.
hmm, I had the same problem - with [EMAIL PROTECTED] set in
/etc/environment at least. Installing the -transcoded p
Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 08:36:51PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to get twm or fvwm start without -transcoded?
>
>
> Yes; I do it all the time.
hmm, I had the same problem - with LANG=de_DE@euro set in
/etc/environment at least. Installing the -tran
Branden Robinson wrote:
> XPRINT expertise is very hard to come by. Few people in the XFree86
> Project have worked with it, and I think fewer still in Debian have.
>
> I suggest talking to about it.
I'll take it up with them, thanks Branden!
Yours Malte #8-)
Malte Cornils wrote:
> I'm trying to
> downgrade to sid Xfree now [...]
Hmm, since downgrading to Xfree86 4.1.0-6 did not alleviate the
problem, I suppose I should turn elsewhere (namely to Sun) for
support wrt this problem since the X prerelease is innocent. Sigh.
(still, if anyone ca
Branden Robinson wrote:
> XPRINT expertise is very hard to come by. Few people in the XFree86
> Project have worked with it, and I think fewer still in Debian have.
>
> I suggest talking to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> about it.
I'll take it up with them, thanks Branden!
Yours Malte #8-)
--
To UNSUB
Hello,
I'm having a weird problem with the non-free StarOffice (5.2)
application which I assume is related to the new Xfree (or more
specifically, the xprt) package. StarOffice now doesn't start
anymore, while a few days before it worked fine. I've done an strace
-f and it goes into an infinite lo
Malte Cornils wrote:
> I'm trying to
> downgrade to sid Xfree now [...]
Hmm, since downgrading to Xfree86 4.1.0-6 did not alleviate the
problem, I suppose I should turn elsewhere (namely to Sun) for
support wrt this problem since the X prerelease is innocent. Sigh.
(still, if anyo
Hello,
I'm having a weird problem with the non-free StarOffice (5.2)
application which I assume is related to the new Xfree (or more
specifically, the xprt) package. StarOffice now doesn't start
anymore, while a few days before it worked fine. I've done an strace
-f and it goes into an infinite l
Hi!
Regarding my inquiry from a few days ago, the problem went away,
since a Xfree86.org CVS tree checked out recently gave me the Render
extension, so it's kinda obvious that Debian unstable Xfree86
packages aren't synced with the latest CVS, which is what I thougt
anyway.
Thanks, Yours Malte #
Hi!
Regarding my inquiry from a few days ago, the problem went away,
since a Xfree86.org CVS tree checked out recently gave me the Render
extension, so it's kinda obvious that Debian unstable Xfree86
packages aren't synced with the latest CVS, which is what I thougt
anyway.
Thanks, Yours Malte
Hi,
As stated on this and Xfree's Xpert mailing list, X4.0.2 doesn't
have RENDER support for Mach64 (=the non-Radeon non-r128 part of the
ati driver); it got added with patch no. 7[1] right after the
release. There's another patch, #68 that disables the RENDER
extension if shadowfb is used; what I
Hi,
As stated on this and Xfree's Xpert mailing list, X4.0.2 doesn't
have RENDER support for Mach64 (=the non-Radeon non-r128 part of the
ati driver); it got added with patch no. 7[1] right after the
release. There's another patch, #68 that disables the RENDER
extension if shadowfb is used; what
22 matches
Mail list logo
