directx-headers_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, lintian: E: directx-headers source: no-human-maintainers Please add uploaders, thanks. -- bye Joerg === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

Re: xserver-xorg-input-mouse_1.6.0-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

>> Reject Reasons: >> xserver-xorg-input-mouse source: lintian output: 'missing-build-dependency >> quilt (>= 0.46-7~)', automatically rejected package. >> xserver-xorg-input-mouse source: If you have a good reason, you may override >> this lintian tag. > Why did that get added back? Well. Lint

Bug#515214: [PATCH] hal depends -> recommends

nput devices for your X server, + either make sure you install hal alongside this package, or add + 'Option "AutoAddDevices" "off"' in the ServerLayout section of your + /etc/X11/xorg.conf (without the '') and configure input devices as you + did in the past.

xserver-xorg-video-nouveau_0.0.10~git+20080602+e034616-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, there is a license issue to clarify before this can enter main. The files nv_cursor.c, nv_setup.c, nv_local.h, nv_hw.c, nv_exa.c, nv_dac.c and nv_dac.c contain a license header that is not DFSG free (only allows use, but no redistribution, modification, etc). Probably just

Re: libxfont override disparity

On 11267 March 1977, Julien Cristau wrote: >> libxfont-dev_1.3.1-2_i386.deb: package says section is libdevel, override >> says x11. >> libxfont1-dbg_1.3.1-2_i386.deb: package says section is libdevel, override >> says x11. >> libxfont1_1.3.1-2_i386.deb: package says section is libs, override sa

Re: mesa override disparity

On 11241 March 1977, Julien Cristau wrote: >> libgl1-mesa-dri_7.0.2-3_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, >> override says extra. > I think the override should be changed, as most people will want that > package to get 3d working in Xorg. >> libgl1-mesa-swx11-dbg_7.0.2-3_i386.deb: packa

compiz-fusion-plugins-extra_0.6.0-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, your debian/copyright file is incomplete and misses (C)holders/license data. You have to include all such differences. Like src/showdesktop/* (but there might be more, i stopped looking) -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if th

libcompizconfig_0.6.0-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, your debian/copyright file is incomplete and misses (C)holders/license data. You have to include all such differences. Like the LGPL of include/* or plugin/* or most of src/*. And src/ has some files with a different license to GPL/LGPL. You might also want to read http:

Re: xserver-xorg-video-intel override disparity

On 1 March 1977, Julien Cristau wrote: >> xserver-xorg-video-i810_2.1.1-1_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, >> override says x11. > can the override be changed? xserver-xorg-video-i810 is a real package > in etch, but a transitional package in lenny and sid. Done. -- bye Joerg It

Re: xorg override disparity

On 10900 March 1977, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 01:02:04 +, Debian Installer wrote: > >> There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the >> override file for the following file(s): >> >> xlibmesa-dri_7.1.0-11_all.deb: package says section is libs, overr

xinit_1.0.4-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, your copyright file is missing information, like the upstream url. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

xkbdata_1.0.1-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, use lintian please: E: xkbdata: non-standard-toplevel-dir xbitmaps/ W: xkbdata: file-in-unusual-dir xbitmaps/usr/share/X11/xkb/compat/accessx Rejected. :) -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to

Subscribe

Subscribe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#329842: xlibmesa-dri: Security update supplies unstripped modules on amd64

reassign 329842 security.debian.org tags 329842 + wontfix confirmed kthxbye On 10421 March 1977, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > when I wanted to install the security update I was shocked that it > wanted 73,4 MB more space than the current version. To check if this > was a problem on the buildd, I dow