Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-16 Thread James Antill
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote: > > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote: > > > > Hello,

Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-16 Thread James Antill
nden? If it's woody, then it's probably an upstream problem but X 3.3.6 _should not_ be upgraded (well not to fix this anyway, obviously there may be other reasons to upgrade). -- James Antill -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "If we can't keep this sort of thing out of the kernel, we might as well pack it up and go run Solaris." -- Larry McVoy.

Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-15 Thread James Antill
nden? If it's woody, then it's probably an upstream problem but X 3.3.6 _should not_ be upgraded (well not to fix this anyway, obviously there may be other reasons to upgrade). -- James Antill -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "If we can't keep this sort of thing out of the kernel, we mi