On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 19:51:52 +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> In dmesg, I've noticed the following, which may be related:
> [drm] MTRR allocation failed. Graphics performance may suffer.
Googling for this message led me to
http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 13:37:14 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
>> This doesn't seem to work:
> That's a surprise. Could you try forcing UXA by adding 'option
> "AccelMethod" "uxa"' to the device section of your xorg.conf?
With this, a lockup occurs earlier on, roughly halfway through drawing the
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 16:33:03 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> No, you want to start a dumb window manager instead of starting a
> complex environment (what you call a GUI) with compiz enabled.
>
> For instance, start a failsafe session, run twm, some xterms...
Things work fine with compiz disable
Hello David,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:40:14 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
>> (==) intel(0): Using EXA for acceleration
>>
> Could you try upgrading to kernel 2.6.29 and seeing if that helps?
Actually, this was with 2.6.29.1 already. I'm bui
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 14:06:54 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Does the problem occur without Compiz?
I will need to test this. Option "Composite" "disable", right?
> Note that if the machine locks up, gdb is useless.
With the GUI locked up, the system remains usable remotely; the surprising
thin
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.7.0-1
Severity: important
What am I trying to do:
Use the GUI.
How am I trying to do it:
Log in through xdm into a GNOME environment with compiz set up
What behaviour did I expect:
GUI to be responsive
What behaviour did I get:
* After a short whil
Package: libxfixes-dev
Version: 1:3.0.1.2-4
Severity: normal
/usr/include/X11/extensions/Xfixes.h relies on the "Bool" define from
X11/Xlib.h but does not include that header (directly or indirectly). This
will break testing for the XFIXES extension through
AC_CHECK_HEADER(X11/extensions/X
Package: xdm
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream patch woody sarge sid
[The distro tags are just to be on the safe side - I've only verified that
this applies to the sid source]
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2004-0419 :
CAN-2004-0419 (under review)
retitle 241249 libxcursor-dev: Errorneous xcursor.pc prevents other packages
from successful compilation
tags 241249 + upstream fixed-upstream
severity 241249 grave
thanks
Justification: "makes the package in question unusable or mostly so". Using
a .pc file through pkg-config is the recommended
/control] Added build dependency on pkg-config. (Closes: #225433)
+ * [debian/control] Removed superfluous space from description to silence
+lintian.
+
+ -- J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:55:15 +0100
+
xcursor (1.0.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Update cop
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 09:31:08 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Disadvantages of a new "xinit" package:
> 2) Anybody who manages to not have the metapackages installed,
> and gets xinit but not xbase-clients, may end up wondering
> where that stuff is, and will file bugs
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 09:31:08 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Disadvantages of a new "xinit" package:
> 2) Anybody who manages to not have the metapackages installed,
> and gets xinit but not xbase-clients, may end up wondering
> where that stuff is, and will file bugs
12 matches
Mail list logo
