Hi,
the upgrade from 1.5-2 to 1.6-1 changed my modifier map in this way:
--- mod-5-2 2009-07-12 14:04:38.326061286 +0200
+++ mod-6-1 2009-07-12 14:05:37.274064763 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-xmodmap: up to 3 keys per modifier, (keycodes in parentheses):
+xmodmap: up to 4 keys per modifier, (
Hi Michel,
Michel Dänzer schrieb am Fri 05. Dec, 18:01 (-0800):
> On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 15:56 +0100, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xorg
> > Version: 1:7.4~4
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > since using kernel version 2.6.28-rc1 my
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.4~4
Severity: normal
Hi,
since using kernel version 2.6.28-rc1 my iBook doesn't enter the sleep
mode, if X is active. If X is running, but not active, i.e. I'm on a
virtual consol (e.g. tty2) the system goes asleep. With the kernel 2.6.27
I've no problems.
When
Package: xinit
Version: 1.0.8-1
Severity: whishlist
Hi,
please use /bin/sh for startx. I don't see any problems and I've changed
the #! line at me and have no problems.
Rational: dash doen't have the dependencies on libncurses and libdl and
doesn't keep so much files open like bash does. Often
Hi Julien,
Julien Cristau schrieb am Mon 02. Jul, 18:21 (+0200):
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 16:22:05 +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>
> > Package: xserver-xorg-core
> > Version: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > my X server cras
Brice Goglin schrieb am Mon 04. Jun, 22:50 (+0200):
> Does this rare crash of the X server still happen nowadays?
No. I've didn't saw it in the last four weeks, at least. It seems to be
gone.
Bye, Jörg.
--
Dein Gesicht wird dir geschenkt. Lächeln musst du selber! (Inga Hermann)
pgpraitnJ6A74.p
Brice Goglin schrieb am Mon 04. Jun, 21:27 (+0200):
> Does this crash of the X server in icewm still happen with latest
> xserver-xorg-core 1.3 currently in unstable?
No. I've tried it today with version 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6 and the X server
didn't crash.
Bye, Jörg.
--
Prof: Ist etwas an der Tafel n
Brice Goglin schrieb am Sun 03. Jun, 21:39 (+0200):
> About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding a crash
> of the X server (which you provided a backtrace for). It looks like a
> GLX problem (builtin GLcore/mesa module in the server). However, I
> didn't find a similar backtra
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Dickey schrieb am Thu 01. Mar, 20:38 (-0500):
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:50:11AM +0100, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> > Package: xterm
> > Version: 224-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > the manual page of xterm says: Note that xterm has one bold font which
> > you may set ex
Package: xterm
Version: 224-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
the manual page of xterm says: Note that xterm has one bold font which
you may set explicitly. It attempts to match a bold font for the other
font selections (font1 through font6). If the normal and bold fonts are
distinct, this resource [boldMod
Hello Michel,
Michel Dänzer schrieb am Fri 19. Jan, 08:36 (+0100):
> On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 00:09 +0100, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> >
> > > > I append the whole X log.
> > >
> > > It doesn't show the problem though, probably because you disabled
> >
Hallo Michel,
Michel Dänzer schrieb am Thu 18. Jan, 14:24 (+0100):
> On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 12:58 +0100, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> >
> > when I enable the glx module my server crashes while starting the window
> > manager icewm with the following backtrace
> >
> > B
Hi,
in the version 222-2 of xterm a new behaviour of BoldMode and BoldFont
was implemented. Can someone explain it to me? How must I set the options
to get bold emulation (former BoldMode = false) and use the a special
font for bold characters?
This is my config that worked with xterm before 222-
Salut,
in xterm 222-2 was a added that changed the behaviour of BoldMode and
BoldFont. But I don't understand what's the new behaviour.
% xrdb -query | grep -E 'bold|font:'
XTerm.*.boldFont: -misc-fixed-bold-*-*-*-18-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1
XTerm.*.boldMode: false
XTerm.*.font: -misc-f
Hi,
my X server dies often. What should I do with the backtraces? I can't
read them. Therefore I don't know if a backtrace belongs to an already
reported bug or not. Should I file a new bugreport for every backtrace I
get?
BTW: How informative these backtraces are for you? Do you find bugs with
Package: libxft-dev
Version: 2.1.8.2-8
Severity: normal
Hi,
the site http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ pointed me to the problem that
my package xjed defines too much dependencies:
http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/log.xjed_0.99.18-5.html I could track
down this problem to
% pkg-config --libs xft
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.1.0-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I don't know why it died and I can't reproduce it. But, maybe, this
backtrace helps you. Otherwise close this bug:
Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X11/X(xf86SigHandler+0x94) [0x1008ebb8]
1: [0x100374]
2: [0x122c90b0]
3: [0x122c90b0]
4: /usr/li
Package: xspecs
Version: 1:1.0.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
gv and evince are not able to search in the PS files. A PDF file is
searchable. Please, build the files as PDFs to make it easier to work
with them.
Thanks, Jörg.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: unstable/experimental
APT prefers
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal
File: /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc
Hi,
the option -dpi 100 is appended while starting with xinit or startx. The
X server can itself determine how much dpi the display has. If you set
this option hard to 100 many users get the wrong resol
19 matches
Mail list logo
