Re: Please re-build and upload xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7

2004-09-15 Thread Gerhard Tonn
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: Yes, that works. Thanks a lot! It will save us an upload :-) But I can't upload this privately fixed version, since this will lead to FTBFS for potential security rebuilds in sarge. Gerhard

Re: Please re-build and upload xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7

2004-09-14 Thread Gerhard Tonn
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: Hi Gerhard, On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Gerhard Tonn wrote: I am getting the same error when building it manually. The doc directory doesn't exist. Gerhard thanks a lot for your help. Can you be so kind to apply this patch and test if the build comp

Re: Please re-build and upload xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7

2004-09-13 Thread Gerhard Tonn
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: Hi guys, thanks for attempting another build of X on s390, but the situation didn't change. I am pretty sure that the buildd is still lacking disk space. The main difference from -6 and -7 is that the fonts are not builded anymore and the process goes much

Re: test build of XSF XFree86 SVN revision 1177 wanted

2004-04-02 Thread Gerhard Tonn
Branden Robinson wrote: Excellent! Does the build log show it skipping the xc-xserver-xfree86-dbg nonsense entirely? xc-xserver-xfree86-dbg doesn't appear at all in the build log. I hope that's o.k. Gerhard

Re: test build of XSF XFree86 SVN revision 1177 wanted

2004-03-31 Thread Gerhard Tonn
Branden Robinson wrote: [I am not subscribed to -s390; please follow-up to -x as well.] Can an s390 person please test revision 1177 of the trunk in the XSF SVN repository of XFree86? The goal of that change was to make sure that s390 stops uselessly setting up and building the xc-xserver-xfree

4.3.0-0pre1v4 on s390

2003-11-14 Thread Gerhard Tonn
I have built 4.3.0-0pre1v4 on s390 and got the problem, that xmodmap.std doesn't exist on s390 for some reason. Since it is now part of xbase-clients.examples and installed by dh_installexamples, the build fails. Everything else works fine. Anybody an idea? Please cc me on reply. Regards, Ger

Re: please build XFree86 4.2.0-0pre1v3

2002-08-27 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 18:52, Branden Robinson wrote: > > [Please reply to debian-x.] > > Hi folks, > > ARM hasn't built my experimental X 4.2.0 packages since 0pre1v1, and s390 > and little-endian MIPS never have. > > If possible, could someone perform builds of 0pre1v3 for these > architectur

Re: XFree86 4.1.0-15pre16v1 available for testing

2002-04-10 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Tuesday 09 April 2002 19:17, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I do, however, need feedback on how well these packages build and work > on ARM and S/390. > > Needless to say, these updates are important for the woody release. > It builds fine on s390 and all packages are installable. Thanks, Gerha

Re: Fwd: Re: testers wanted for xfree86 4.1.0-14pre15v3

2002-04-06 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Saturday 06 April 2002 10:48, you wrote: > - define special substvar F:XWSC-Special-Depends to take care of the > fact that s390 doesn't build xserver-xfree86, and still keep the > x-window-system-core metapackage useful > * debian/scripts/vars.*: define XWSC_SPECIAL_DEPENDS for al

Fwd: Re: testers wanted for xfree86 4.1.0-14pre15v3

2002-04-05 Thread Gerhard Tonn
Hi, there seems to be another issue on s390 with the latest xfree version. Excuses says: x-window-system-core/s390 unsatisfiable Depends: xserver-xfree86 Gerhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: testers wanted for xfree86 4.1.0-14pre15v3

2002-03-12 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Monday 11 March 2002 23:55, Branden Robinson wrote: > > The sooner I can put this release to bed, the sooner I can > work on 4.2.0. > > Experimental versions of the X packages are available at my repository. > > Please test these so that 4.1.0-15 can be a solid release, worthy of the > woody re

Re: testers wanted for xfree86 4.1.0-14pre15v3

2002-03-12 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Monday 11 March 2002 23:55, Branden Robinson wrote: > > The sooner I can put this release to bed, the sooner I can > work on 4.2.0. > > Experimental versions of the X packages are available at my repository. > > Please test these so that 4.1.0-15 can be a solid release, worthy of the > woody r

Re: new build of XFree86 required for hurd-i386 and s390

2001-09-11 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Tuesday 11 September 2001 08:08, Branden Robinson wrote: > Can someone build 4.1.0-5 for these architectures? I don't have access > to unstable boxen of these kinds to do it myself. > > If there are any problems with the package build, please let me know. Already in incoming. I had some probl

Re: new build of XFree86 required for hurd-i386 and s390

2001-09-11 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Tuesday 11 September 2001 08:08, Branden Robinson wrote: > Can someone build 4.1.0-5 for these architectures? I don't have access > to unstable boxen of these kinds to do it myself. > > If there are any problems with the package build, please let me know. Already in incoming. I had some prob

Re: XFree 4.0.3 and 4.1 on s390

2001-07-29 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Sunday 29 July 2001 01:00, Branden Robinson wrote: > > could you please add the latest MANIFEST.s390 and the debian/rules patch > > for s390 to 4.1. I have done some testing in the meantime and it looks > > fine so far. > > I would, but either I don't have have them or I've already done so. Di

Re: XFree 4.0.3 and 4.1 on s390

2001-07-29 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Sunday 29 July 2001 01:00, Branden Robinson wrote: > > could you please add the latest MANIFEST.s390 and the debian/rules patch > > for s390 to 4.1. I have done some testing in the meantime and it looks > > fine so far. > > I would, but either I don't have have them or I've already done so. D

Re: XFree 4.0.3 and 4.1 on s390

2001-07-28 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Sunday 01 July 2001 22:08, Branden Robinson wrote: > Be sure you send me MANIFEST.s390.new, not MANIFEST.s390. Hi Branden, could you please add the latest MANIFEST.s390 and the debian/rules patch for s390 to 4.1. I have done some testing in the meantime and it looks fine so far. Are you int

Re: XFree 4.0.3 and 4.1 on s390

2001-07-28 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Sunday 01 July 2001 22:08, Branden Robinson wrote: > Be sure you send me MANIFEST.s390.new, not MANIFEST.s390. Hi Branden, could you please add the latest MANIFEST.s390 and the debian/rules patch for s390 to 4.1. I have done some testing in the meantime and it looks fine so far. Are you in

Re: XFree 4.0.3 and 4.1 on s390

2001-07-01 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Sunday 01 July 2001 09:46, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > How much of XFree86 are you building? I assume you don't have an S/390 > with a graphics adapter. I am building the libraries only. It is controlled by the #define NOT_BUILDING_X_SERVER, which is set in debian/scripts/vars.s390. This is alre

XFree 4.0.3 and 4.1 on s390

2001-07-01 Thread Gerhard Tonn
Hi, I am currently working on XFree 4.0.3 and 4.1 for s390. Below are some issues I have found so far. First of all, glide shouldn't be prerequisite for XFree on s390. The xkb files are still in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb instead of /etc/X11/xkb. I am not quite sure what the reason is, but suspect t

Re: XFree 4.0.3 and 4.1 on s390

2001-07-01 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Sunday 01 July 2001 09:46, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > How much of XFree86 are you building? I assume you don't have an S/390 > with a graphics adapter. I am building the libraries only. It is controlled by the #define NOT_BUILDING_X_SERVER, which is set in debian/scripts/vars.s390. This is alr

XFree 4.0.3 and 4.1 on s390

2001-06-30 Thread Gerhard Tonn
Hi, I am currently working on XFree 4.0.3 and 4.1 for s390. Below are some issues I have found so far. First of all, glide shouldn't be prerequisite for XFree on s390. The xkb files are still in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb instead of /etc/X11/xkb. I am not quite sure what the reason is, but suspect