Re: NVdriver User Support List

2000-10-03 Thread Franklin Belew
On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 10:52:40AM -0500, Jon Pennington wrote: > I know this isn't the best place to ask, but I can't seem to find out > if/where there is an nVidia-sponsored user support list for the > TNT/GeForce drivers on their site. I'm having some trouble with the > nvidia_drv module, and I

Re: NVdriver User Support List

2000-10-03 Thread Franklin Belew
On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 10:52:40AM -0500, Jon Pennington wrote: > I know this isn't the best place to ask, but I can't seem to find out > if/where there is an nVidia-sponsored user support list for the > TNT/GeForce drivers on their site. I'm having some trouble with the > nvidia_drv module, and

Re: libGLcore.a, libglx.a conflict with nvidia non-free drivers

2000-09-21 Thread Franklin Belew
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 02:19:56AM +0200, Vedran Rodic wrote: > Hi! > > I think that files in subject (located in > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions) should be a part of xlibmesa3 package, > since libGLcore.a is clearly mesa specific, I'm not sure about libglx.a. > man dpkg-divert Frank aka Myt

Re: libGLcore.a, libglx.a conflict with nvidia non-free drivers

2000-09-21 Thread Franklin Belew
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 02:19:56AM +0200, Vedran Rodic wrote: > Hi! > > I think that files in subject (located in > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions) should be a part of xlibmesa3 package, > since libGLcore.a is clearly mesa specific, I'm not sure about libglx.a. > man dpkg-divert Frank aka My

Re: [timshel@pobox.com: X4 phase 2 packages issue ...]

2000-09-11 Thread Franklin Belew
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:33:56AM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote: > Also, I have noticed that some of the packages you mention that are having > problems with libxpm4 depend directly on xpm4g rather than libxpm4, so > some of these problems could be fixed by making xlibs provide xpm4g. > This won't wo

Re: [timshel@pobox.com: X4 phase 2 packages issue ...]

2000-09-11 Thread Franklin Belew
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:33:56AM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote: > Also, I have noticed that some of the packages you mention that are having > problems with libxpm4 depend directly on xpm4g rather than libxpm4, so > some of these problems could be fixed by making xlibs provide xpm4g. > This won't w