On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 05:54:19AM -0600, Sam TH wrote:
> I just upgraded all my X packages, and notice a problem with the
> OpenGL pacakages. mesag3 conflicts with xlibmesa3, which is to
> be reasonable expected (can't have two versions of mesa on my
> system). However, libqt2.2-dev (but not l
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 05:54:19AM -0600, Sam TH wrote:
> I just upgraded all my X packages, and notice a problem with the
> OpenGL pacakages. mesag3 conflicts with xlibmesa3, which is to
> be reasonable expected (can't have two versions of mesa on my
> system). However, libqt2.2-dev (but not
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 10:11:25PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001101 21:16]:
> > Can anyone else repro this problem? Does the X server get hung up if it's
> > looking for a font server that isn't there?
>
> I tried and failed to make my X server hang.
>
>
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 10:11:25PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001101 21:16]:
> > Can anyone else repro this problem? Does the X server get hung up if it's
> > looking for a font server that isn't there?
>
> I tried and failed to make my X server hang.
>
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:56:33PM -0600, Jeff Lessem wrote:
> I should probably be asking these on newbie or xpert, but as this list
> has so much less volume I thought I would try here first. I am
> running a 2.4.0-test9 woody system with whatever the latest Debian
> XFree86 4.0.1 packages happe
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:56:33PM -0600, Jeff Lessem wrote:
> I should probably be asking these on newbie or xpert, but as this list
> has so much less volume I thought I would try here first. I am
> running a 2.4.0-test9 woody system with whatever the latest Debian
> XFree86 4.0.1 packages happ
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 09:58:29PM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on http://samosa.debian.org/~branden/woody/i386/ I found
> varous 4.01 packages but not a mach64 XServer. Does that
> just mean that this xserver wasn't debianized yet ?
>
XF4 now uses a unified server with various mo
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 09:58:29PM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on http://samosa.debian.org/~branden/woody/i386/ I found
> varous 4.01 packages but not a mach64 XServer. Does that
> just mean that this xserver wasn't debianized yet ?
>
XF4 now uses a unified server with various m
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 11:34:45PM -0400, Will Lowe wrote:
> > The problem is that when I did "xmessage -f /path/to/messagefile"
>
> I'm using the 3.3.6 debs on this machine, but "xmessage -f /tmp/x.msg"
> gives me an xmessage containing "-f /tmp/x.msg", while "xmessage -file
> /tmp/x.msg" works
I was going to use xmessage to clear up the error mozilla gives
on startup with an old .mozilla dir since running it from a menu gives
no useful sign.
The problem is that when I did "xmessage -f /path/to/messagefile"
it showed no real text, just an empty white box, and an Ok button.
Can anyone
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 11:34:45PM -0400, Will Lowe wrote:
> > The problem is that when I did "xmessage -f /path/to/messagefile"
>
> I'm using the 3.3.6 debs on this machine, but "xmessage -f /tmp/x.msg"
> gives me an xmessage containing "-f /tmp/x.msg", while "xmessage -file
> /tmp/x.msg" works
I was going to use xmessage to clear up the error mozilla gives
on startup with an old .mozilla dir since running it from a menu gives
no useful sign.
The problem is that when I did "xmessage -f /path/to/messagefile"
it showed no real text, just an empty white box, and an Ok button.
Can anyone
12 matches
Mail list logo
