Re: possible libc 2.2.1/xf4.0.2 bug

2001-02-14 Thread Edouard GUIRCH
> > > And -- oops -- today my X got the same deadly signal. > > > (although it took *much* longer than 30 seconds for X to die; > > > I guess, it was working for about 5 hours). > > > Recently (yesterday?), I upgraded libc from 2.2 to 2.2.1 (both from > > > woody). > > no problems with X here. Are

Re: possible libc 2.2.1/xf4.0.2 bug

2001-02-14 Thread Edouard GUIRCH
> > > And -- oops -- today my X got the same deadly signal. > > > (although it took *much* longer than 30 seconds for X to die; > > > I guess, it was working for about 5 hours). > > > Recently (yesterday?), I upgraded libc from 2.2 to 2.2.1 (both from woody). > > no problems with X here. Are you g

Re: "working" Xfree86 dies after 30 seconds

2001-02-10 Thread Edouard GUIRCH
> From: Lysander > > Hi, I'm running woody, and I've got xfree86 4.0.2-1 installed.. with an nv > card > Xfree86 Loads, works, and then dies after a short time (30 seconds, I > estimate) In a private letter, I asked Lysander for log files, and he responded that X dies from SIGSEGV. And -- oops

Re: "working" Xfree86 dies after 30 seconds

2001-02-10 Thread Edouard GUIRCH
> From: Lysander > > Hi, I'm running woody, and I've got xfree86 4.0.2-1 installed.. with an nv card > Xfree86 Loads, works, and then dies after a short time (30 seconds, I estimate) In a private letter, I asked Lysander for log files, and he responded that X dies from SIGSEGV. And -- oops -- to