Hi Cyril,
Is there anything missing here that we can help with?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53fcbb4a.7080...@br.ibm.com
Hi Cyril,
I am traveling to Portland and without too much acess to it. I would ask
Mauricio
to solve it.
Thank you,
Breno
On 08/21/2014 02:33 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Breno Leitao (2014-05-22):
>> Package: xcb-util
>> Version: 0.3.8
>> Severity: normal
>> Tags:
Hi,
Sorry to bother you again, but I am wondering if you have chance to look at
this bug.
Thank you,
Breno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53ea27f3.806
On 07/24/2014 05:44 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 16:07:58 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
>
>> hi Julien,
>>
>> How do you want to handle this bug? Do you want me a patch for configure?
>>
> Now applied your patch in git. Not sure when the
hi Julien,
How do you want to handle this bug? Do you want me a patch for configure?
This is a bug that is part of the top priority bugs for ppc64el platform as
shown in:
https://wiki.debian.org/ppc64el/topBugs
Thank you,
Breno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
Hi Maintainer,
I am wondering if you have chance to look at this bug. I would like to say that
his bug is one of the most important bugs that are affecting ppc64el
architecture
right now according to the ppc64el top priority bug[1].
Since this is a bug that shouldn't cause any regression, I woul
Package: libxp
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Currently, the patch libxp fails to build on the new architecture (as ppc64el)
due to outdated autotool files, which cause the following problem on ppc64el:
http://ftp.unicamp.br/pub/ppc64el/debian/buildd-upstream/build_logs/logs/libxp_
Package: xcb-util
Version: 0.3.8
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Hi,
The xcb-util package is not invoking dh-autoreconf during the build, which
fails when we try to compile it on new arch
On 04/22/2014 03:27 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> In order to be able to compile pixman on the ppc64el archictecture, the
>> option
>> disable-vmx needs to be disabled at this initial moment. So, this patch
>> adds the
>> --disable-vmx option during the configure process.
>>
> Shouldn't configu
maintainer upload.
+ * Disable vmx on the ppc64el architecture to enable the package to be built.
+
+ -- Breno Leitao Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:11:10 +
+
pixman (0.32.4-1) sid; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -uNpr pixman-0.32.4/debian/rules pixman-0.32.4.new/debian/rules
--- pix
On 03/26/2014 04:21 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> +XSERVER_XORG_VIDEO_DEPENDS="xserver-xorg-video-dummy"
>> +XSERVER_XORG_INPUT_DEPENDS="xserver-xorg-input-void"
>
> NAK. This should at least get the fbdev (and possibly modesetting)
> video driver, and evdev for input.
That makes sense. So, a new
Source: xorg
Version: 7.7+6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch sid
Dear Maintainer,
We are working to enable the new architecture ppc64el[1] and we would like to
submit a patch to enable the package xorg to be compiled, with the minimal
support at this first moment.
So, I am attaching this patch th
12 matches
Mail list logo
