RE: XFree4.2 -> unstable?

2002-10-16 Thread Bradley Bell
ally, though. -brad > -Original Message- > From: Guido Guenther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Guido Guenther > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 3:29 PM > To: Bradley Bell > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: XFree4.2 -> unstable? > > > On Thu, Sep 19,

RE: XFree4.2 -> unstable?

2002-10-16 Thread Bradley Bell
ally, though. -brad > -Original Message- > From: Guido Guenther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf > Of Guido Guenther > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 3:29 PM > To: Bradley Bell > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: XFree4.2 -> unstable? > > > On Thu, Sep 19,

RE: XFree4.2 -> unstable?

2002-09-19 Thread Bradley Bell
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 03:16:07PM -0700, Bradley Bell wrote: > > NG1: Revision 6, 24 bitplanes, REX3 revision B, VC2 revision A, xmap9 > > revision A, cmap revision D, bt9445 revision D > > NG1: Screensize 1024x768 > > Console: colour SGI Newport 128x48 > > &g

RE: XFree4.2 -> unstable?

2002-09-19 Thread Bradley Bell
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 03:16:07PM -0700, Bradley Bell wrote: > > NG1: Revision 6, 24 bitplanes, REX3 revision B, VC2 revision A, xmap9 > > revision A, cmap revision D, bt9445 revision D > > NG1: Screensize 1024x768 > > Console: colour SGI Newport 128x48 > > &g

Re: x-terminal-emulator

2000-10-30 Thread Bradley Bell
isn't xterm the 'de facto' standard? it would seem to me that any options xterm understands ought to be supported by x-terminal-emulator. If a certain terminal emulater is not xterm compatible, it would be trivial to provide an 'xterm compatibility wrapper', and have x-terminal-emulator point to

Re: x-terminal-emulator

2000-10-30 Thread Bradley Bell
isn't xterm the 'de facto' standard? it would seem to me that any options xterm understands ought to be supported by x-terminal-emulator. If a certain terminal emulater is not xterm compatible, it would be trivial to provide an 'xterm compatibility wrapper', and have x-terminal-emulator point to