I think the patch for sparc to allow scanning the newer style PCI proc
domain entries has broken 2.4's PCI scanning.
- Forwarded message from "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ben Collins <
Here's the patch. Dave tested a build that included it and things
worked.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
diff -urN xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/sunffb.orig/I
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 11:13:32PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 07:32:20AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > A few weeks ago, I asked for an updated version of the other patch:
> > >
> > > * Apply patch by David S. Miller to im
> A few weeks ago, I asked for an updated version of the other patch:
>
> * Apply patch by David S. Miller to implement XAA and Render support
> in the sunffb driver.
> - debian/patches/073_sunffb_xaa_render_fb_support.diff
>
> If you could get a version to me that will build
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 11:57:42AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> tag 245246 - moreinfo
> tag 245246 + help
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 03:24:31PM +0200, Joerg Friedrich wrote:
> > Branden Robinson schrieb am Mittwoch, 28. April 2004 um 02:49:07 -0500:
> > >
> > > Does the X server sta
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 07:02:55PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 02:30:50AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 03:45:45PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > The problem appears to be that the
> The problem appears to be that the sunffb patch added in 4.3.0-3
> declares and uses FFBDPMSSet, but doesn't actually provide a new
> function definition. This suggests that there may have been other
> problems in the patch as added to the package, too, so it should be
> replaced or reverted.
>
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 07:01:06AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> A couple of people on a recent thread in debian-devel linked to a
> message I recently posted on Slashdot on this subject. I had thought
> about posting this information to Debian's lists as well, but at the
> time, didn't see a
X/YY.Z. Seems it
doesn't work on your card (no idea why).
--
.--===-=-======-=====---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
X/YY.Z. Seems it
doesn't work on your card (no idea why).
--
.--===-=-======-=====---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===---
n find all the Debian patches there.
--
.--===-=-==-=---=--------=-=-----.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 11:07:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 06:04:58PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 05:28:52PM -0400, Christian Gils wrote:
> > > (EE) SUNFFB: Failed to load module "dri" (once-only module, 0)
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 05:28:52PM -0400, Christian Gils wrote:
>
> anyone have any ideas?
Comment out the dri module in XF86Config-4, it will load automatically
if needed.
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben C
he X server crashes ->
> sunMouseEnqueueEvent : unrecognized id
> xinit : connection to X server lost.
I strongly suggest using XFree86 4.1.0. The old -xsun servers are old
hacks.
Ben
--
.--===-=-======-=====---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins -
best shape it's been in.
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=-------=----=-=-.
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
best shape it's been in.
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=-------=----=-=-.
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 06:38:58PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 09:38:13PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > the attached patch removes some previous workarounds by adding proper
> > &
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 06:38:58PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 09:38:13PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > the attached patch removes some previous workarounds by adding proper
> &
gt; + "# 8 nops to fool the R4400 pipeline\n\t" \
> + "nop;nop;nop;nop;nop;nop;nop;nop\n\t" \
> + ".set\treorder" \
> + : /* no output */ \
> + : /* no input */
gt; + "# 8 nops to fool the R4400 pipeline\n\t" \
> + "nop;nop;nop;nop;nop;nop;nop;nop\n\t" \
> + ".set\treorder" \
> + : /* no output */ \
> + : /* no input */
AFAIK, m68k still uses 2.2.x kernel
headers to build glibc. Thus, you need another work around.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
AFAIK, m68k still uses 2.2.x kernel
headers to build glibc. Thus, you need another work around.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... --
> This is very close to what I need to support Sun keyboards properly.
>
> If someone can find a configuration that works and uses only:
>
> XkbRules
> XkbModel
> XkbLayout
Probably just use what's above minus the XkbKeymap option. I need to
install a window manager on
> This is very close to what I need to support Sun keyboards properly.
>
> If someone can find a configuration that works and uses only:
>
> XkbRules
> XkbModel
> XkbLayout
Probably just use what's above minus the XkbKeymap option. I need to
install a window manager on
first line above.
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
first line above.
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
or not), and set the mouse type to BusMouse. This
needs to be an option on sparc, Branden.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
or not), and set the mouse type to BusMouse. This
needs to be an option on sparc, Branden.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:34:48PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 08:39:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:52:51AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > 1) 4.0.2-12 for i386 is broken. Just building against libc6 2.2.2-2 is
>
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:34:48PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 08:39:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:52:51AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > 1) 4.0.2-12 for i386 is broken. Just building against libc6 2.2.2-2 is
have now :)
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
have now :)
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
;t think this is the same problem. I've seen one particular
linktime error with Xmu on sparc, and it contains no such libc5
libraries.
--
---=======-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
;t think this is the same problem. I've seen one particular
linktime error with Xmu on sparc, and it contains no such libc5
libraries.
--
---=======-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
`
c 2.2, I said X *depends* on it,
because Branden is building X against glibc 2.2.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
c 2.2, I said X *depends* on it,
because Branden is building X against glibc 2.2.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROT
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:28:44AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > No, it doesn't. X depedns on glibc 2.2 (which is not in woody because of
> > m68k) and it also does not build on all of our support
oesn't. X depedns on glibc 2.2 (which is not in woody because of
m68k) and it also does not build on all of our supported archs (m68k and
arm).
So there is no way it can be in testing.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:28:44AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > No, it doesn't. X depedns on glibc 2.2 (which is not in woody because of
> > m68k) and it also does not build on all of our support
glibc 2.2 (which is not in woody because of
m68k) and it also does not build on all of our supported archs (m68k and
arm).
So there is no way it can be in testing.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=
glibc
compiled done). Doesn't matter if it requires MacOS either, so long as it
emulates a 68040 and runs Linux.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=========---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
glibc
compiled done). Doesn't matter if it requires MacOS either, so long as it
emulates a 68040 and runs Linux.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=========---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECT
t; be nice and save me some searching.
The selection has moved from /etc/X11/Xserver to /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config
Edit that file, and all will be well.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
t; be nice and save me some searching.
The selection has moved from /etc/X11/Xserver to /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config
Edit that file, and all will be well.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- D
rather simple. Setup gpm to repeat as msc and set X up
to use type "MouseSystems" on device /etc/gpmdata. Works perfectly for me.
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/L
7;s rather simple. Setup gpm to repeat as msc and set X up
to use type "MouseSystems" on device /etc/gpmdata. Works perfectly for me.
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/L
own list.
This would mean it is always in sync with the system.
There are no license conflicts with this approach.
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
27;s own list.
This would mean it is always in sync with the system.
There are no license conflicts with this approach.
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROT
to check instead of checking proc.
Question is then, will this "2.2.x" build run on 2.4.x? :)
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
ld just symlink and use that exact file).
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
to check instead of checking proc.
Question is then, will this "2.2.x" build run on 2.4.x? :)
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED]
f it
could just symlink and use that exact file).
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [
fails on 2.4
> boxen.
>
Would it solve the problem if you were using 2.4 kernel headers aswell as
running a 2.4 kernel? If so, would that same build work on a 2.2 kernel?
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on tha
fails on 2.4
> boxen.
>
Would it solve the problem if you were using 2.4 kernel headers aswell as
running a 2.4 kernel? If so, would that same build work on a 2.2 kernel?
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on tha
;s on potato. So keep up the builds
:)
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=====-------==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
;s on potato. So keep up the builds
:)
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=====-------==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==
e are some other PCI drivers (r128, permedia, chips), but I have no
idea how they are working.
Branden, attached are four of the sparc specific files for the build.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... --
e are some other PCI drivers (r128, permedia, chips), but I have no
idea how they are working.
Branden, attached are four of the sparc specific files for the build.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... --
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 01:33:10AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 09:57:01PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Well, here it is. This should unpack right into the source dir. It
> > includes the sparc specific debhelper files, and the MANIFEST. It also has
&
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 01:33:10AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 09:57:01PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Well, here it is. This should unpack right into the source dir. It
> > includes the sparc specific debhelper files, and the MANIFEST. It also has
&
fixup
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROT
fixup
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROT
ething bad every day I guess.
Heh, I'd rather have this than have to recompile all applications because
versioned symbols did not exist to begin with. Atleast with this scheme,
we have an upgrade path (that wasn't there for the libc5 -> libc6
changeover).
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
you didn't know what
you were doing, don't blame me :)
Please let me know of success/failures concerning tgx/leo/cg3/cg6/cg14/bw2
drivers.
http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/xfree86-4/
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins
bviously there
> may be other reasons to upgrade).
Yes it should, just to fix this. Versioned symbols and their solution for
binary compatibility, ensured that everything will still run as it did
before. It does not mean that things wont have to be rebuilt to allow
linking.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
uot;BusMouse" or "PS/2" (I'm adding a patch so we can actually say "SunMouse"
or "Sun", but it all points to BusMouse, just like in 3.3.6). PS/2 is just
like the one on your Ultra. BTW, did you get the ati driver working? :)
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
you didn't know what
you were doing, don't blame me :)
Please let me know of success/failures concerning tgx/leo/cg3/cg6/cg14/bw2
drivers.
http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/xfree86-4/
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins
bviously there
> may be other reasons to upgrade).
Yes it should, just to fix this. Versioned symbols and their solution for
binary compatibility, ensured that everything will still run as it did
before. It does not mean that things wont have to be rebuilt to allow
linking.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=-
uot;BusMouse" or "PS/2" (I'm adding a patch so we can actually say "SunMouse"
or "Sun", but it all points to BusMouse, just like in 3.3.6). PS/2 is just
like the one on your Ultra. BTW, did you get the ati driver working? :)
Ben
--
---=
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 02:23:49PM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 09:03:20AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Obviously the server list in dexter needs to be different on non-i386,
> > aswell as the generated keyboard lines (on sun there are two default
> &
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 02:23:49PM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 09:03:20AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Obviously the server list in dexter needs to be different on non-i386,
> > aswell as the generated keyboard lines (on sun there are two default
> &
build, and it has no idea
what a "USB" mouse is. Known problem?
--
---===-=-==-=---=====----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
build, and it has no idea
what a "USB" mouse is. Known problem?
--
---===-=-==-=---=====----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PR
allation script returned error exit status 1
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> xserver-xfree86
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
IIRC, v16 fixes this.
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...
allation script returned error exit status 1
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> xserver-xfree86
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
IIRC, v16 fixes this.
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...
This includes the libxrx files (which are now built using the patch I sent
yesterday).
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
Noticed some more files that are needed...
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
Generated, and attached.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
This includes the libxrx files (which are now built using the patch I sent
yesterday).
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
Noticed some more files that are needed...
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
Generated, and attached.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 07:02:30PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 06:14:11PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > (Branden, let me know if you want me to just email debian-x)
> >
> > There is no libxrx compiled for sparc. I'm not even sure what t
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 07:02:30PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 06:14:11PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > (Branden, let me know if you want me to just email debian-x)
> >
> > There is no libxrx compiled for sparc. I'm not even sure what t
he command line of the dh_* calls.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
he command line of the dh_* calls.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL
3.3.6-10 and
> > have encountered problems with ghostscript
> > stemming from the reference to undefined
> > getpwnam_r@@GLIBC_2.0 by libXt.
>
> Ben Collins (new glibc and libdb2 maintainer) told me they w
3.3.6-10 and
> > have encountered problems with ghostscript
> > stemming from the reference to undefined
> > getpwnam_r@@GLIBC_2.0 by libXt.
>
> Ben Collins (new glibc and libdb2 maintainer) told me they w
between Debian's X packages and Progeny's for as long as
> possible.
You know, if you force X to use libdb2, it will work with 2.1.3 and
2.1.94. The easy (not sure how easy in terms of the X build) is to replace
with and -ldb with -ldb2.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-
fork between Debian's X packages and Progeny's for as long as
> possible.
You know, if you force X to use libdb2, it will work with 2.1.3 and
2.1.94. The easy (not sure how easy in terms of the X build) is to replace
with and -ldb with -ldb2.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-
Here's 6 patches. 4 are needed for sparc/sparc64 (ignore the ia64 in some,
they still have sparc specific things in them), and 2 are security
related.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic v
Here's 6 patches. 4 are needed for sparc/sparc64 (ignore the ia64 in some,
they still have sparc specific things in them), and 2 are security
related.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic v
Branden, hopefully this will fix our crashes with the Xsun* servers...
- Forwarded message from Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
X-From_: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 13 09:31:24 1999
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: XFree86, Debian, and patches
From: Ste
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 02:54:51PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 08:46:41AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 02:40:34PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I never said it needed to be rejected, I just said add #i
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 02:40:34PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> >
> > I never said it needed to be rejected, I just said add #if's around it,
> > which was
> > contructive and solved both problems. You cannot have it in regmach64.h
> > even with
> > the #if's around it for sparc, I tried it and i
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 02:17:43PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> >
> > As I said before commenting that out will break sparc, please add "#ifdef
> > __sparc__" around the function instead.
>
> Huh ???
>
> Ok, but it makes no sense to have regwbe for sparc in mach64im.c, and having
> regw,regr and
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 03:23:10PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 07:53:00PM +0200, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > > > And another mistake in the patch, should have waited a bit more before
> > > > posting,
> > > > but since i was going away, i wanted to make things available.
> >
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 03:01:43PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 02:14:30PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 09:24:17AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > >
> >
> >
> > Oops a little mistake came up because of the haste, correct patch is
> > attached
> > ..
On Sun, Sep 19, 1999 at 12:52:03AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 09:24:17AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > --- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/accel/mach64/mach64im.c.orig Wed Sep
> > 15 17:01:53 1999
> > +++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/accel/mach64/mach64im.c Wed
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 02:14:30PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> ---
> /home/luther/Xfree/3.3/debian/xfree86-1-3.3.4/build-tree/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/accel/mach64/mach64util.c.orig
> Thu Sep 16 07:34:58 1999
> +++
> /home/luther/Xfree/3.3/debian/xfree86-1-3.3.4/build-tree/xc/programs
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 09:24:17AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> --- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree68/mach64/Imakefile.orig Wed Sep 15
> 18:24:42 1999
> +++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree68/mach64/Imakefile Wed Sep 15 18:25:04 1999
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
> LinkSourceFile(mach64pntwn.c,../../xfree86
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
