On 2024-03-23 Diederik de Haas wrote:
[...]
> 2) near the end of your build log is the following message:
> "../os/meson.build:63:8: ERROR: Problem encountered: secure-rpc requested,
> but
> neither libtirpc or libc RPC support were found"
> And that matches the build issue mentioned in #1065184
Package: libgl-dev
Version: 1.3.0-5
Severity: serious
Hello,
libgl-dev seems to lack a dependency on libx11-dev. Rebuilding e.g.
3depict results in the following error:
/usr/include/GL/glx.h:30:10: fatal error: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory
30 | #include
cu Andreas
On 2018-03-15 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2018-03-15 Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>> On 14.03.2018 22:25, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Package: libinput-dev
[...]
> > > Root cause are the new dependencies in Requires.private
> > > without package dependencies:
[...]
On 2018-03-15 Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 14.03.2018 22:25, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Package: libinput-dev
[...]
> > Root cause are the new dependencies in Requires.private
> > without package dependencies:
> > $ pkg-config --cflags libinput
> > Package libwacom was not found in the pkg-config sear
On 2015-10-22 mario_lu...@tiscali.it wrote:
> Hello everyone.
> Sorry if I write not with reportbug.
> I have the same problem of Andreas Metzler but unlike him i do not
> have systemd installed.
> I tried to force the installation of libpam-systemd but the
> situation has n
Control: reassign 802618 xserver-xorg-core 2:1.17.2-2
Control: severity 802618 serious
Control: retitle 802618 keyboard/mouse support broken - mising dep on
libpam-systemd?
On 2015-10-21 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Package: xinit
> Version: 1.3.4-3
> Severity: important
> Hello,
&
Package: xinit
Version: 1.3.4-3
Severity: important
Hello,
yesterday's X11 upgrade broke my setup, both keyboard and mouse are
dead under X.
I am starting X with startx, and am ataching the X log file. Comparing
old (X as root) ad new logfile, these seem to be the interesting
lines:
--
reassign 711053 xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
severity 711053 important
thanks
On 2013-06-04 "rowan.windwhist...@gmail.com"
wrote:
[...]
>* What led up to the situation? Simply start hugin from a terminal and teh
> whole X system crashes and cannot be started again till the sytem is rebooted.
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel-dbg
Version: 2:2.1.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
The new version of xserver-xorg-video-intel cannot propagate to
testing since xserver-xorg-video-intel-dbg is uninstallable on sparc.
The reason for that is easy to see:
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/t
Package: xkb-data
Version: 0.9-4
Severity: normal
Hello,
after ugrading to etch I have refound #241127 (now in xkb-data instead
of XFree86). With this setup:
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Generic Keyboard"
Driver "kbd"
Option "CoreKeyboard"
Hello,
this bug should probably be closed. Works for me with Xorg.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/beast$ dpkg -l xserver*ati | grep ^ii
ii xserver-xorg-video-ati 6.6.3-2X.Org X server -- ATI display driver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep 5960 /var/log/Xorg.0.log
(II) PCI: 01:00:0: chip 1002,5960 card 1
reassign 405951 iceape-browser
found 405951 1.0.7-2
thanks
On 2007-01-10 Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I'll assume this is an mga driver issue and reassign there. If it
> appears not to be one, please reassign here.
Well, I have switched to a Radeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] and can stil
Stefan Huehner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: x11proto-render-dev
> Version: 2:0.9.2-3
> Severity: wishlist
> your package builds 'render-dev' for transitional purposes. Currently
> there are only 2 packages left (in sid) which depend on render-dev
> - xorg-x11 (6.9)
> - openoffice.org (bug
On 2006-05-03 Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> The bug concerns the following. When upgrading, I got questions like
> this one:
> The default keyboard layout selection for the Xorg server will be based
> on a combination of the language and the keyboard layout selected in the
>
On 2006-05-01 Martin Šlouf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just to clarify: Can you see unresolved references in libxcursor1 with
>> *current* debian unstable? Do you have problems with gaphor on Debian
>> unstable?
> no, i dont have unresolved references in current debian unstable.
> everything is
[Quoting fixed]
On 2006-05-01 Martin Šlouf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 05:48:21AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
[...]
>> It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
[...]
>> On 2005-04-26 Mart
On 2006-02-18 Magnus Ihse Bursie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: libxvmc-dev
> Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
> Severity: important
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
> The libXvMCW.a contains non-relocatable code. This means that any attempt to
> build a lib*.so which links statica
On 2005-02-24 Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> reopen 293480
> thanks
Why did you reopen the bug? I fail to reproduce it on sarge.
cu and- sending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] without any rationale sucks. -reas
--
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
v
On 2006-04-30 Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xnest
> Version: 1:1.0.2-7
> Severity: normal
> The man page for Xnest seems to be missing from the package; it was
> probably lost in the Xorg transition womewhere. Could you please
> readd it?
This should do it (untested, just
On 2006-04-13 Mike Brodbelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xfs
> Version: 1:1.0.1-4
> Severity: normal
> With previous versions of xfs, the config file used by default was
> /etc/X11/fs/config, however the newly packaged version now defaults to
> using /usr/lib/X11/fs/config.
[...]
Hello,
On 2006-04-29 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.x) you wrote:
[cannot find X]
> > The build-dependencies (which worked before) are: "libx11-dev,
> > libxext-dev, libxpm-dev, xutils, debhelper
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.x) you wrote:
> Hi, I need some help or suggestions or something. My package WMRack
> builds fine here--but I haven't yet upgraded to the new "modular" X.
> It fails to build on Debian's autobuilders though, and I'm darned if I
> have any id
On 2006-04-23 René van Bevern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xorg
> Severity: wishlist
> Version: 1:7.0.14
> The xorg metapackage currently depends on xterm. Could the dependency
> on xterm please be replaced by a dependency on "xterm |
> x-terminal-emulator"? This would give users the con
Dominique Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've upgraded from Xork 6.9 to Xorg 7.0. While updating, aptitude
> insisted on removing xprint. Then xprint-common was removed by
> aptitude as it was no longer used.
> Unfortunately, I couldn't get Xorg to start with startx. Long story
> short, I fou
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> if [ ! -L "/usr/X11R6/bin" ] && [ -d "/usr/X11R6/bin" ]; then
>> is more readable.
> More readable, not as portable.
Which systems have problems with that? [ ! sometest ] is
posix-compatible.
cu and- just wondering -reas
--
The 'Galactic C
On 2006-04-17 Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Suggested patch:
> --- debian/x11-common.postinst.in~ 2006-04-15 18:33:45.0 +0200
> +++ debian/x11-common.postinst.in 2006-04-17 15:16:42.0 +0200
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
>fi
> fi
> -if [ ! -L -e -d "/usr/X1
X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Log:
> * Make x-window-system and x-window-system-core transitional packages that
> depend on the xorg package. These packages will smooth upgrades from sarge
> and will be removed upon the release of etch.
[...]
> +++ trunk/d
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Sorry this took so long to get uploaded everyone. Being the genius that I
> am, I kept forgetting my GPG key at home, where I couldn't upload the whole
> package set effectively. Sorry I haven't written the xlibs-dev announcement
> yet either, but I
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 22 October 2005 22:57, Will Dyson wrote:
>> + for name in `find src -print | grep -v svn` ; \@@\
> I would suggest to make that grep -v "\.svn".
This should be faster
[...] find src -name .svn -prune -or -print
I do not kn
X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: dnusinow
> Date: 2005-09-26 18:48:50 -0500 (Mon, 26 Sep 2005)
> New Revision: 621
> Modified:
> trunk/debian/changelog
> trunk/debian/x11-common.preinst.in
> Log:
> * Have x11-common preinst check for xfree86-common conff
On 2005-09-25 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> No, you would only need to ship the *md5sum* of the old xfree86-common
> conffile with the x11-common package, for comparison with the currently
> installed version of the file.
Hello,
That is currently not possible isn't? i.e. there
On 2005-09-12 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 06:37:20PM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 00:12 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > retitle 327744 [FTBFS] libxrender missing libxt-dev build-dep
[...]
> > That would just be a workaround, it would be
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * We no longer build or ship xlibs-dev
> That's right everyone. We have a deadline for the transition and that's the
> upload of 6.9 to unstable.
[...]
Hello,
How about also dropping the "| xlibs (>> 4.1.0)" from all the
shlibs-files? They really serve
Dainel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:24:12PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> xlibs contains more than 300 dpkg-conffiles, and moving them from one
>> package to another requires lots of manual md5summing in the
>> package maintain
Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:10:40AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
>> Package: xorg-x11
>> Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4
>> Priority: wishlist
>> This source package provides several dummy packages which are present in
>> sarge, etch and sid: x
On 2005-06-24 David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
>Here's the updated status of what's going on. With the ftp-master move
> in progress, I decided to skip uploading the current packages to
> experimental as planned. Instead what I've done is uploaded them to my
> space on people.debia
Alexander Koch tiscali.net> writes:
> I have quite an old install and my /usr/ was not large
> enough, so I copied it elsewhere and had /usr/lib/ be
> a symlink.
Hello,
This was bound to break sooner or later on a package using symlinks, because
symlinks within /usr will be relative (policy 10.5)
On 2004-12-13 Jim Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> $ dpkg -S /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
> xlibmesa-gl: /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
> $ ldd /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
> libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xb7eba000)
> libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0xb7eac000)
>
On 2004-12-13 Jim Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xlibmesa-gl
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8
[...]
> $ dpkg -S /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
> xlibmesa-gl: /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
> $ ldd /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
> libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xb7eba000)
> libXext.so.6 =>
On 2004-12-07 Christian Ospelkaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8
> Severity: important
> On my system with onboard i865, I see regular crahses when the screen
> blanks while I am logged in. The xserver log file contains the
> I830WaitLpRing()
> e
On 2004-12-07 Christian Ospelkaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8
> Severity: important
> On my system with onboard i865, I see regular crahses when the screen
> blanks while I am logged in. The xserver log file contains the
> I830WaitLpRing()
[...
Hello,
I've got the impression that this fact somehow might miss the radar:
Sarge currently includes -4 which suffers from #251307 (Using Xv on
ATI Rage makes X crash.) /_*IMHO*_/ this is a blocker, how about
reopening it, tagged as sarge, with serious severity?
Sorry if this has already been disc
On 2004-07-24 Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> $ xset q
> could print screen resolution parameters, e.g., 800x600.
As xset cannot modify the resolution and xset is not a "show
information"-tool (but one to change preferences) I disagree. I think
xdpyinfo would make you happy.
On 2004-07-09 Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 04:36:48PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > Package: xlibs
> > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Hello,
> > I've just made a fresh
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: important
Hello,
I've just made a fresh sarge installation (without tasksel) and ended up
without xkbd data because xlibs is not depended on by any package
(including x-window-system-core). This results in a rather broken
keyboard if you are not usi
On 2004-06-20 Benoit Panizzon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
> Severity: normal
> I'm not sure if this bug is related to xserver-xfree86 or another pakage that
> was updated in testing the last few
> days.
> Fact is, when I try to watch a Video wi
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:53:18AM +0100, Tom Taylor wrote:
> Package: x-window-system
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
> Running Sid.
>
> Not sure if it is a bug (but annoying anyway :-) x-window-system's
> dependencies include xdm and twm and other things that are not really
> essential to running X
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> * What kinds of X packages would you like to see in the future?
As a user, all I care about:
* DFSG-free
* supports my hardware
* is ready whenever Debian would like to make a release, i.e. X should
not be the delaying point itself.
* (cr
retitle 253386 xserver-xfree86: [ati/atimisc] XVideo apps crash X server;
complaints of unresolved symbol xf86XVCopyYUV12ToPacked on 3D Rage Pro 215GP
tags 253386 fixed-upstream patch pending sid upstream
merge 253386 251307
thanks
On 2004-06-09 Scott Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package
tags 252558 fixed-upstream patch pending sid upstream
retitle 252558 xserver-xfree86: [ati/atimisc] XVideo apps crash X server;
complaints of unresolved symbols xf86XVCopyYUV12ToPacked and xf86XVCopyPacked
on ATI 3D Rage Mobility
merge 251307 252558
thanks
On 2004-06-04 Frank Murphy <[EMAIL PROTE
tags 252201 patch sid upstream
merge 252201 251307
retitle 252201 xserver-xfree86: [ati/atimisc] XVideo apps crash X server;
complaints of unresolved symbol xf86XVCopyYUV12ToPacked on 3D Rage LT Pro
thanks
On 2004-06-02 Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Versi
severity 251387 important
tags 251387 sid pending
merge 251387 251119
thanks
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:50:03PM +0200, Marius Mikucionis wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 14:06, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > reassign 251387 xlibs
> > merge 251387 251263
> > thanks
> whatever
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:35:54PM -0500, Brad Sims wrote:
> Package: xlibs
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: sid
> Is there a work-around/ETA for a fixed package?
Soon.
However this is easy to fix for you, without having to live with a
broken system:
1) download http://pe
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 09:11:19PM +0300, Ville Vainio wrote:
> Package: xlibs
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2
> Severity: normal
> After apt-get upgrade for sarge (including dfsg-1.2 X server stuff),
> keyboard layout stopped working for KDE.
> Neither the command:
> setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout
reassign 251387 xlibs
merge 251387 251263
thanks
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 11:59:57AM +0200, Marius Mikucionis wrote:
> Package: xbase-clients
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2
> Severity: normal
> After dayly upgrade setxkbmap broke:
> it does not load any keyboard description.
> I use "setxkbmap us,lt -op
merge 251197 251157
thanks
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 01:35:29PM +0200, kakaouete wrote:
> Package: xlibs
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: sid
>
> After the last update of xfree in sid, the numeric keypad doesnt work.
> I tried to "setxkbmap fr" or "setxkbmap us" but, what i ge
On 2004-05-27 David Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2
> Severity: important
> Keyboard layout changes by one column when capslock is active, as
> demonstrated below.
> normal: qwerty asdfgh zxcvbn
> shift: QWERTY ASDFGH ZXCVBN
> caps: WERTYU S
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 03:34:47PM +0200, peppe wrote:
[...]
> > ... this suggest using leaving LANG unset and only setting LC_CTYPE to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (No idea whether this is supported by xlibs.) The whole
> > point of the different LC-variables is that you can selectively set
> > them.
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 11:14:51AM +0200, giuseppe bonacci wrote:
> Package: xlibs-data
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n
> This seems to be a cross-package issue, but I think this is the best
> place to raise it. I know I could play with config files and solve the
> prob
On 2004-05-21 Chris Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: libxft-dev
[...]
> The diversion is *still* broken.
[...]
Not very surprising.
| Tags: wontfix
And there is a explanation for setting the tag available on
http://bugs.debian.org/237509 which even mentions a workaround for
you.
| There
On 2004-05-06 Richard du Feu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Preparing to replace libxft-dev 2.1.2-5 (using
> .../libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb) ...
> diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h to
> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h by libxft-dev
> Removing `diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11
Hello,
On http://www.logic.univie.ac.at/~ametzler/.x/FAQ.xhtml you can find an
initial shot at conversion of the FAQ to xhtml. It validates
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.logic.univie.ac.at%2F%7Eametzler%2F.x%2FFAQ.xhtml
as XHTML 1.0 Strict. It could be beautified with proper
On 2004-04-20 Nightmare --- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: XFree86
> Version: 4.2.0
XFree86 4.2.0 was never part of Debian, you are using unofficial,
severly outdated packages.
cu andreas
--
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juv
Hello,
How is the status of -8? The changelog is already almost as long as
the changelogs for -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 and -7 taken together and especially
the xlib6g fix should be part of sarge, shouldn't it?
Afaict Branden is going to manage this release:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2004/debian-x-20
On 2004-04-19 Russ Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: libxv1
> Version: 4.3.0-7
> Severity: normal
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> libxv1
[...]
>trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/lib/libXv.so.1.0', which is also in
>package
>xlibs
[...]
Your version of xlib
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 02:33:38PM +0200, Christian Guggenberger wrote:
>> Attached is a patch stolen from xfree86's bugzilla (#923).
>> I've rediffed it, to fit into 4.3.0-7. Builds fine on sparc, and glx
>> apps are fine with indirect mesa rendering again
On 2004-04-04 Fionn Behrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: libxv1
> Version: 4.3.0-7
> Severity: normal
> Unpacking libxv1 (from .../libxv1_4.3.0-7_i386.deb) ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxv1_4.3.0-7_i386.deb
> (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/lib/li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I want to start XFree86 with startx I get the answer like:
>
> Fatal server error:
> Module load failure
[...]
> (II) LoadModule: "freetype"
> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libfreetype.a
> (II) Module freetype: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
> compiled for
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0-7
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
I've discus^Wasked Branden about this on IRC and he suggested I file
a bug about it.
With the setup below key generates "acute" instead of
apostrophe. - See also #122525.
I think this should fix it. - It works for me:
--- /etc/X11
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.x Francois Isabelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is that what's happening ?
> 1 - XFree86 changed licensing, which introduced some GPL compatibility
> issues and some deviations to debian DFSG(debian free software
> guidelines).
Yes.
> 2 - Some are arguing that the new
Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 06:04:51PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
> wrote:
>> Author: branden
>> Date: 2004-03-25 18:04:49 -0500 (Thu, 25 Mar 2004)
>> New Revision: 1187
>>
>> Modified:
>>trunk/debian/changelog
>>trunk/debian/xserver-
On 2004-03-25 Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 04:24, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > That does not work:
> > * Because of the way debconf double-executes the config script set -x
> > set for the current shell is not used when actual
On 2004-03-25 Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay Gents. Have done the editing of
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/xserver-xfree86.[pre|post]inst
> To have "set -x" as the second line
> As they Both now are faulty since I downgraded to -5 and the re-updated to
> -7
> I even did a "set -x" before
On 2004-03-24 Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0-7
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid
> Justification: renders package unusable
[...]
> Performed a dist-upgrade. So I am working. But I did do a base
> install, then an "dpkg --set-selections" "apt-get dsel
On 2004-03-18 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I *think* neither of the build-errors are xfree86's fault, they rather
> look like subspace anomalies on the buildd.
[...]
At least the alpha-error is simple to diagnose:
---
dh_install --sourcedir=debian/tmp
cp:
Hello,
I *think* neither of the build-errors are xfree86's fault, they rather
look like subspace anomalies on the buildd.
s390 looks like a buildd-error it almost finishes the build (thanks
for 10MB of logfile) and seems to kill it.
# confirm that the installed fil
Christian Guggenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, -5 FTBSFes on mips, -6 in i386. from the buildd's logs:
[...]
The FTBS of -6 on i386, ia64, s390, alpha and hppa seem to be identical.
cu andreas
Andreas Bach Aaen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fredag den 5. marts 2004 23:08 skrev Chris Waters:
>> On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:09:41PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> > You are right, it does not work, because xlibs in sid conflicts
>> > with xlib6g. Howeve
Leonardo Rochael Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
[...]
> FWIW, The following packages, present on my system and installable
> from stable, still require xlib6g, and will either have to be
> removed or will stall an xlibs upgrade:
[..]
> navigator/communicator (aka moz 4.77) and it's dependencies
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
[Build-error on ia64]
> If the problem is reproducible, though, it will likely need a human to
> try the build.
Hello,
Afaict it is not. According to
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=xfree86&ver=4.3.0-5&arch=ia64&file=log
4.3.0-5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0-3
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
[...]
>> Transcript written on latex.log.' instead of a filename.
>> I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!
>> make[6]: *** [sync.dvi] Error 1
[...]
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:15:23PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Andreas Bach Aaen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Package: xlib6g
>> > Severity: normal
>> > Tags: sid
>> > I nee
Andreas Bach Aaen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xlib6g
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid
> I need xlib6g to be able to install netscape navigator 4.7x on
> unstable.
Use equivs.
> Please don't ask why I need this old package, but old
> application packages ought to installable.
[..]
Wher
Hello,
Just FYI: Afaict the builds of 4.3.0-3 (only tried on alpha and powerpc)
failed because of #235401 (yes, it is rc) against tetex-bin. - Not your
fault.
| Setting up tetex-bin (2.0.2-8) ...
[...]
| Running initex. This may take some time. ...
| Error: `tex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=late
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libICE.so.6, needed by
> /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-linux/3.3.3/../../../libXm.so, not found (try using
> -rpath or -rpath-link)
[...]
If this is of any help, I can provide more examples of this breakage
with exim4 4.30-7.
*
Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:00:05AM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
>> For me it is: well, there are some websites I have to
>> look at with netscape since mozilla doesnt display
>> them (same for the submitter, if I understand him right);
>> and I lik
X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Log:
> Stop passing -q to fgrep if we actually want output from it. Duh.
> Thanks again to Filip Van Raemdonck.
[...]
> observe "removing $dir directory from $ldsoconf"
> - fgrep -qsvx "$dir" "$ldsoconf" > "$ldsoconf
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Joerg Morbitzer]
>> The /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 that comes with the Debian include
>> /dev/psaux and /dev/input/mice ! But nearly all the administrators I
>> know adjust and configure XF86Config-4 manually - and will probably
>> fail like I did when upgra
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:08:19PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
[...]
>> I did, however, state that I felt that 4.3.0-1 was by far the superior
>> base to work from in sid, for a number of reasons (not least that
>> propagation to sarge would put the XSF
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 04:23:10PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>> > On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 05:11:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
>> > No, I don't have a DONT_BUILD_SERVER option.
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 02:36:15PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> [Resent, the news2mail gateway has swallowed the article]
>> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Author: daniel
>>> Date
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 02:36:15PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> [Resent, the news2mail gateway has swallowed the article]
>> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Author: daniel
>>> Date
[Resent, the news2mail gateway has swallowed the article]
X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: daniel
> Date: 2003-08-31 02:22:38 -0500 (Sun, 31 Aug 2003)
> New Revision: 464
[...]
> * Add Synaptics touchpad driver version 0.11.3p11 (Closes: #204688):
>+ debian/patches
[Resent, the news2mail gateway has swallowed the article]
X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: daniel
> Date: 2003-08-31 02:22:38 -0500 (Sun, 31 Aug 2003)
> New Revision: 464
[...]
> * Add Synaptics touchpad driver version 0.11.3p11 (Closes: #204688):
>+ debian/patches
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 06:19:21PM -0500, David Kennedy wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[synaptics touchpad driver]
>> Is there any reason why the driver is not included in XFree86? Aren't
>> they accepting it or don't they want to include it.
> Y
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 06:19:21PM -0500, David Kennedy wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[synaptics touchpad driver]
>> Is there any reason why the driver is not included in XFree86? Aren't
>> they accepting it or don't they want to include it.
> Y
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I remember right someone has gone to the trouble of compiling the latest
> (4.2.1) debs for woody.
Afaik multiple people have.
> Branden, would it be possible for you to add a link to these unofficial
> woody repositories on the X Strike Force page? I
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I remember right someone has gone to the trouble of compiling the latest
> (4.2.1) debs for woody.
Afaik multiple people have.
> Branden, would it be possible for you to add a link to these unofficial
> woody repositories on the X Strike Force page? I
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> * hates and fears text config files and will not touch them
> * will read and edit a text config file
> But there is such a third group:
> * will edit a text config file, but only given very precise and explicit
> instructions -- will not read
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> * hates and fears text config files and will not touch them
> * will read and edit a text config file
> But there is such a third group:
> * will edit a text config file, but only given very precise and explicit
> instructions -- will not read
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
