Hi,
On 05.01.2014 11:51, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 08:29:24 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
OK, then. Reassigning to tasksel (as we should have done for quite a
while, indeed
It is probably best to include plymouth in tasksel, but still the
installer would have to rec
On 04.01.2014 00:19, Steve McIntyre wrote:
No, please! Let's not add more fluff to the base system.
Maybe it is better to install plymouth only, if task-desktop is installed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
On 03.01.2014 20:50, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Yes, I checked the BTS before replying. I'm just not sure end users
having troubles to boot are actually able to work around those issues
and to report bugs. (I've at least seen people switch distro instead of
figuring out what went wrong.)
That's of
Hi KiBi,
On 03.01.2014 20:05, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Last I remember from squeeze (didn't check wheezy too much), plymouth
was quite buggy/broken, and has been RC buggy for a long while (hello
libdrm-nouveau); I'm not sure it's a good idea to install it by default,
but I'm happy to take opinions
4 matches
Mail list logo
