Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> Short of adding a "Driver nvidia" line in my xorg.conf, how can I get
> the xserver to use that driver in preference to "nv"?
I hope this isn't too intrusive, but the very nature of your question has
itself sparked my curiosity.
Why would you want to be able to con
The Composite extension is still not loaded by default. If there is no
'Option "Composite" "Enable"' line in xorg.conf then it does not load.
However, it does load if that line is present, which is better than what
it used to do.
Anything else I can do?
Adam
--
...when two opposite points o
With 'Option "Composite" "Enable"' the composite extension is now
enabled. I guess something must have changed between versions dfsg-2 and
dfsg-6.
I'll see if it still works without the line there at all and have a
general play with it over the weekend.
Adam
--
...when two opposite points o
Brice Goglin wrote:
Hi Adam,
Did you have a chance to find out why the Composite extension wasn't
enabled before?
No. I have no idea why it wasn't enabled, and no real idea of where to
start, short of breaking out LXR and a debugger. But I'm not an xorg
hacker, and delving into a codebase th
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 10:09 +0100, Adam Spragg wrote:
>> What next?
>
> Have you tried commenting out the "Enable" after Option "Composite"?
Um, I have now, and it works! No idea why that makes a difference, but
it does. Happy now. :)
&
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> As you don't have the
>
> (**) Extension "Composite" is enabled
>
> line, it appears like the config file parser doesn't even see the
> option...
>
>>> I guess "initialized" is different from "enabled"...
>> It says it's initializing it, and then gives no warnings or error
Brice Goglin wrote:
> Adam Spragg wrote:
>> With or without an "Option Composite Enable" line in my xorg.conf,
>> Xorg.0.log claims that the Composite extension is initialized. At least,
>> no errors are reported.
>
> I guess "initialized" is differe
7 matches
Mail list logo
