Your message dated Thu, 09 Dec 2021 22:22:37 +0100
with message-id <871r2lqxr6@turtle.gmx.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#1001390: xterm / uxterm / lxterm suddenly missing from
alternatives
has caused the Debian Bug report #1001390,
regarding xterm / uxterm / lxterm suddenly missing from alternat
Hi Sven,
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 07:28:22PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> There is a postinst script in dpkg which moves the misplaced files from
> /var/lib/dpkg to /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives, but if more than one
> package sets up an alternative, that is apparently not enough.
I didn't have any '
On 2021-12-09 18:39 +0100, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 05:36:03PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> Probably you have hit bug #1001198 in dpkg 1.21.0, which corrupts the
>> alternatives database.
>
> ugh :( That may very well be.
>
>> Did you upgrade dpkg to version 1.21.1 yet? I
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 05:36:03PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Probably you have hit bug #1001198 in dpkg 1.21.0, which corrupts the
> alternatives database.
ugh :( That may very well be.
> Did you upgrade dpkg to version 1.21.1 yet? If not, please do so and
> report back.
yes, I do have dpk
On 2021-12-09 15:24 +0100, Harald Welte wrote:
> Package: xterm
> Version: 370-1
> Severity: normal
>
> After upgrading xterm to the most recent package in xterm,
> suddenly the x-terminal-emulator alternative was pointing
> to gnome-terminal instead of uxterm (before the upgrade).
>
> Even worse,
Package: xterm
Version: 370-1
Severity: normal
After upgrading xterm to the most recent package in xterm,
suddenly the x-terminal-emulator alternative was pointing
to gnome-terminal instead of uxterm (before the upgrade).
Even worse, xterm and uxterm are apparently no longer even
registered with
6 matches
Mail list logo
