Bug#909436: libdrm 2.4.102-1: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (updated patches)

2020-09-14 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 14.9.2020 18.44, Svante Signell wrote: > found 909436 2.4.102-1 > thanks > > Hello again, > > libdrm still FTBFS on GNU/Hurd now due to bug #970304 and still missing > support for Hurd in drm.h and xf86drm.h. Attached is a patch, hurd- > port.diff, to fix this. The rest of that patch address P

Processed: libdrm: Found 909436 2.4.102-1

2020-09-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 909436 2.4.102-1 Bug #909436 [src:libdrm] libdrm: FTBFS on hurd-i386 Marked as found in versions libdrm/2.4.102-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 909436: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr

Bug#909436: libdrm 2.4.102-1: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (updated patches)

2020-09-14 Thread Svante Signell
found 909436 2.4.102-1 thanks Hello again, libdrm still FTBFS on GNU/Hurd now due to bug #970304 and still missing support for Hurd in drm.h and xf86drm.h. Attached is a patch, hurd- port.diff, to fix this. The rest of that patch address PATH_MAX issues in xf86dri.c as PATH_MAX is not defined for

Bug#970304: libdrm: FTBFS on kfreebsd-any

2020-09-14 Thread Svante Signell
Source: libdrm Version: 2.4.102-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs, patch User: debian-k...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hello, Currently libdrm FTBFS GNU/kFreeBSD (and GNU/Hurd) due to usage of #elif __FreeBSD__ instead of #elif defined(__FreeBSD__) in xf86drm.c. Attached is a patch to fi