Processed: would it work with elogind?

2019-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 +patch Bug #923198 [xserver-xorg-core] xserver-xorg-core: false direct dependency on libpam-systemd Added tag(s) patch. -- 923198: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923198 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble

Bug#923198: would it work with elogind?

2019-02-24 Thread Adam Borowski
Control: tags -1 +patch [Can't test it right now, perhaps in the evening todorrow. Noticed this bug filed on #-changes] > xserver-xorg-core has a hard dependency on libpam-systemd. Violates > "Depends: This declares an absolute dependcy... No, it has only Recommends. On the other hand, apt ha

Bug#923198: xserver-xorg-core: false direct dependency on libpam-systemd

2019-02-24 Thread Joshua
Package: xserver-xorg-core Version: 2:1.20.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: newcomer Justification: Policy 7.2 Dear Maintainer, xserver-xorg-core has a hard dependency on libpam-systemd. Violates "Depends: This declares an absolute dependcy... The Depends field should be used if the depended-on packa

Bug#923188: xdm: file /etc/X11/xdm/Xsession has many newlines before #!

2019-02-24 Thread Joshua
Package: xdm Version: 1:1.1.11-3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Trying to use xdm for the first time in a decade after sddm destroyed itself * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Xdm logged me in to some craz