Bug#666468: submitted duplicate i think

2012-07-11 Thread Jarrett Chisholm
Hi, Just submitted a bug report, but I think it's a duplicate of this bug. 'Bug#681286: nouveau: text gets mangled in iceweasal' is the one I reported. My apologies. -- Jarrett Chisholm jchish...@icebreakersent.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subj

Bug#681263: is your libdecoration0 from Debian?

2012-07-11 Thread Adam Borowski
Works for me, both with gtk-window-decorator and emerald. On amd64, like you. > compiz: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/compiz/libdecoration.so: undefined > symbol: decor_property_to_quads There are two libraries with nearly the same file name: /usr/lib/compiz/libdecoration.so (package compiz-plu

Newcomer to xserver-xorg-video-ati PTS

2012-07-11 Thread Hor Jiun Shyong
Hi Guys, I am Hor Jiun Shyong here. I just joined the xserver-xorg-video-ati PTS mailing list. I would like to offer my assistance for any help needed for the package. Many thanks. -- Regards, Hor Jiun Shyong 何俊雄 Blog: jiunshyong.dyndns.org twitter.com/jiunshyong facebook.com/jiunshyong I'm

Processed: patch for 678784

2012-07-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package src:compiz Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'src:compiz' Limit currently set to 'package':'src:compiz' > tags 678784 +patch Bug #678784 [src:compiz] compiz: FTBFS: window.cpp:893:25: error: invalid convers

Bug#677864: compiz works just fine

2012-07-11 Thread Adam Borowski
Could you please elaborate what exactly is the problem with compiz 0.8? It works well; I use it at home (currently with xfce) and the only problem is remembered window positions being wrong on startup. At least the situation is worlds better than the current state of certain other window managers

Bug#678784: fix for FTBFS in 0.8.4-8.2

2012-07-11 Thread Adam Borowski
Here's a fix for the FTBFS. It has been broken by a change recently introduced in KDE 4.8. -- Copyright and patents were never about promoting culture and innovations; from the very start they were legalized bribes to give the king some income and to let businesses get rid of competition. For

Bug#681265: xorg: Segfault at address 0x48 via dri2. radeon driver. r600

2012-07-11 Thread Nick Thomas
> A full backtrace would be appreciated, hints at: > http://x.debian.net/howto/use-gdb.html > > Mraw, > KiBi. OK, I've got Xorg [...] -core running. All I have to do now is wait for it to explode :). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubsc

Processed: Re: Bug#681265: xorg: Segfault at address 0x48 via dri2. radeon driver. r600

2012-07-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 681265 important Bug #681265 [xorg] xorg: Segfault at address 0x48 via dri2. radeon driver. r600 Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 681265: http://

Bug#681265: xorg: Segfault at address 0x48 via dri2. radeon driver. r600

2012-07-11 Thread Cyril Brulebois
severity 681265 important thanks Nick Thomas (11/07/2012): > Package: xorg > Version: 1:7.7+1 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks unrelated software no. > [ 2439.766] Backtrace: > [ 2439.820] 0: /usr/bin/Xorg (xorg_backtrace+0x36) [0x7ff368cc0796] > [ 2439.820] 1: /usr/bin/Xorg (0x7

Bug#681263: libdecoration0: Symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/compiz/libdecoration.so: undefined symbol: decor_property_to_quads

2012-07-11 Thread Pablo Vanwoerkom
Package: libdecoration0 Version: 0.8.4-5.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I install compiz and all its dependencies from unstable, as well as the settings manager and fusion-icon. All is working fine until I enable window decoration. I have set the window

Bug#668828: Correction to workaround # 2 - "square Virtual" irrelevant

2012-07-11 Thread Straight BolognaS
Making virtual "square" does not seem to be relevant. ydim of Virtual just needs to be increased enough to move corruption off screen? Reference: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1937940&page=2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe

mesa: Changes to 'ubuntu'

2012-07-11 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
debian/patches/14-libdrm_nouveau1.diff | 138 + 1 file changed, 138 insertions(+) New commits: commit 8890a007784bc470bcb74d030ba2a3036ebd1e86 Author: Maarten Lankhorst Date: Wed Jul 11 14:22:16 2012 +0200 really add debian/patches/14-libdrm_nouveau1.diff