Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 655384 normal
Bug #655384 [x11-xkb-utils] [x11-xkb-utils] compose+'+c produces wrong result
in most applications (eg. gvim, iceweasel)
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
> tags 655384 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #655384 [x11-xk
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 20:00:52 +, darkestkhan wrote:
> compose+'+c should produce 'ć', but it is producing 'ç' (which is
> generated by compose+,+c) instead. The only application, that I know
> of, that is not affected by this is reportbug-ng.
>
It doesn't here. You'll have to give more in
Package: x11-xkb-utils
Version: 7.6+4
Severity: important
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
compose+'+c should produce 'ć', but it is producing 'ç' (which is
generated by compose+,+c) instead. The only application, that I know
of, that is not affected by this is reportbug-ng.
---
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 20:09, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>>CAS is a read-modify-write instruction, which is not guaranteed to work
>>on all m68k platforms (hence the existence of CONFIG_RMW_INSNS in
>>the kernel).
>
> All platforms currently supported by Debian (that is, not Coldfire and
> with MMU)
Geert Uytterhoeven dixit:
>CAS is a read-modify-write instruction, which is not guaranteed to work
>on all m68k platforms (hence the existence of CONFIG_RMW_INSNS in
>the kernel).
All platforms currently supported by Debian (that is, not Coldfire and
with MMU) should have it, right? I think other
Geert Uytterhoeven writes:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 13:55, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Geert Uytterhoeven writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:56, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
mesa FTBFS on m68k due to lack of GCC atomic intrinsics. (Why are
they (still) missing, anyway?) I’ve had a loo
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 13:55, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:56, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>>> mesa FTBFS on m68k due to lack of GCC atomic intrinsics. (Why are
>>> they (still) missing, anyway?) I’ve had a look at other patches
>>
>> Perhaps And
Geert Uytterhoeven writes:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:56, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> mesa FTBFS on m68k due to lack of GCC atomic intrinsics. (Why are
>> they (still) missing, anyway?) I’ve had a look at other patches
>
> Perhaps Andreas knows?
They are now implemented in 4.7.
Andreas.
--
A
Package: xserver-xorg-video-qxl
Version: 0.0.16-1
Hi,
using certain window managers over spice, we found corrupted
drawables
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-qxl/+bug/913314
and xorg segfaults
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-qxl/+bug/913311
ChangeLog | 42 +
Xi/exevents.c | 20 -
Xi/xiproperty.c|2 -
configure.ac |2 -
debian/changelog |7 ++
debian/patches/2
ChangeLog | 101
configure.ac | 18
debian/changelog | 24 +
debian/control
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:56, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> mesa FTBFS on m68k due to lack of GCC atomic intrinsics. (Why are
> they (still) missing, anyway?) I’ve had a look at other patches
Perhaps Andreas knows?
> floating around on this mailing list and drafted the attached diff
> which makes it
Accepted:
x11proto-input-dev_2.1.99.5-1_all.deb
to main/x/x11proto-input/x11proto-input-dev_2.1.99.5-1_all.deb
x11proto-input_2.1.99.5-1.diff.gz
to main/x/x11proto-input/x11proto-input_2.1.99.5-1.diff.gz
x11proto-input_2.1.99.5-1.dsc
to main/x/x11proto-input/x11proto-input_2.1.99.5-1.dsc
x
x11proto-input_2.1.99.5-1_source+all.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
x11proto-input_2.1.99.5-1.dsc
x11proto-input_2.1.99.5.orig.tar.gz
x11proto-input_2.1.99.5-1.diff.gz
x11proto-input-dev_2.1.99.5-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (runn
ChangeLog | 63 +
XI2.h |1
configure.ac |2 -
debian/changelog |6 +
specs/XI2proto.txt | 28 ++-
5 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 3a10
Tag 'x11proto-input-2.1.99.5-1' created by Cyril Brulebois at
2012-01-10 09:05 +
Tagging upload of x11proto-input 2.1.99.5-1 to experimental.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk8L/1kACgkQeGfVPHR5Nd3yFACfdmPsI+668Uz24jUCzcqUPSgb
X74AoJTrx1bt8xsFSYH
XI2.h |1 +
configure.ac |2 +-
specs/XI2proto.txt | 28 +---
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 1306ccf9f262c0c699bec093ffdc4b6695601599
Author: Peter Hutterer
Date: Fri Jan 6 13:35:25 2012 +1000
inp
Dear m68k porters,
mesa FTBFS on m68k due to lack of GCC atomic intrinsics. (Why are
they (still) missing, anyway?) I’ve had a look at other patches
floating around on this mailing list and drafted the attached diff
which makes it at least compile again. My knowledge is not enough
to validate that
18 matches
Mail list logo
