Bug#549863: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Hang after a few minutes of usage on Intel 855GM

2009-10-05 Thread Vincent Bernat
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel Version: 2:2.9.0-1 Severity: normal Hi! >From a while, I keep Xorg from Lenny because I experience a hang with newer xserver-xorg-video-intel packages (2.5.99, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8 and now 2.9). After reading this: http://bgoglin.livejournal.com/18559.html I have patc

[bts-link] source package mesa

2009-10-05 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package mesa # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #549588 (http://bugs.debian.org/549588) # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id

Bug#549588: xserver-xorg-core: Loading glx module causes X server to crash

2009-10-05 Thread Arnout Boelens
On Monday 05 October 2009 08:50:47 Michel Dänzer wrote: > reassign 549588 libgl1-mesa-dri 7.6-1 > forwarded 549588 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24131 > kthxbye Thanks, Arnout > On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 13:18 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 17:30:33 -0400, Ar

Processed: fix package name

2009-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 547239 xserver-xorg-video-intel Bug #547239 [xserver-xorg-driver-intel] base: xserver crashes time at time Warning: Unknown package 'xserver-xorg-driver-intel' Bug reassigned from package 'xserver-xorg-driver-intel' to 'xserver-xorg-vide

Bug#549661: More info - bug was "developing"

2009-10-05 Thread Michael Donner
As possible hint: I saw the there where no changes on xserver-xorg-video-intel since January 2009. But the problem occured (as I wrote) about September 24. That may allow conclude that there must have been a change around that date which belongs to any sub-dependency of xorg. (This is the very

Processed: Re: Bug#549588: xserver-xorg-core: Loading glx module causes X server to crash

2009-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 549588 libgl1-mesa-dri 7.6-1 Bug #549588 [xserver-xorg-core] xserver-xorg-core: Loading glx module causes X server to crash Bug reassigned from package 'xserver-xorg-core' to 'libgl1-mesa-dri'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions x

Bug#549588: xserver-xorg-core: Loading glx module causes X server to crash

2009-10-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
reassign 549588 libgl1-mesa-dri 7.6-1 forwarded 549588 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24131 kthxbye On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 13:18 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 17:30:33 -0400, Arnout Boelens wrote: > > > X: radeon_bo_legacy.c:207: legacy_is_pending: Assertion

Processed: severity of 549661 is important, reassign 549661 to xserver-xorg-video-intel

2009-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 549661 important Bug #549661 [xorg] xorg: Black screen on login Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > reassign 549661 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.3.2-2+lenny6 Bug #549661 [xorg] xorg: Black screen on login Bug reassigned from packa

Bug#548321: #548321 [xterm] abort() a bit after catting binary file

2009-10-05 Thread Gennady
Verified it here - no more crash. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#549588: xserver-xorg-core: Loading glx module causes X server to crash

2009-10-05 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 17:30:33 -0400, Arnout Boelens wrote: > X: radeon_bo_legacy.c:207: legacy_is_pending: Assertion > `bo_legacy->is_pending <= bo->cref' failed. > I failed to notice this one, Michel says "It's a known bug which was reported upstream a while ago". Cheers, Julien -- To U

Bug#547892: compiz: Reproducible

2009-10-05 Thread Manuel Bilderbeek
Package: compiz Version: 0.8.2-6 Severity: normal I tried to reproduce it by clicking on the left side of any kind of window and in many cases I got the same error. [ 160.659474] compiz.real[3706]: segfault at b573eeb0 ip b573eeb0 sp bfe40fcc error 15 In other words, it's quite easy to reprod