xorg: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2007-04-09 Thread Christian Perrier
debian/changelog |1 + debian/po/sq.po | 24 +++- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) New commits: commit 3487f40c85cfc5a6e0bb39708a43c5732759994d Author: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue Apr 10 07:15:15 2007 +0200 Albanian translati

More software broken by libx11-6 (1.0.3-7) upgrade (fwd)

2007-04-09 Thread Don Barry
Essentially every version (5.5, 5.6, 6.0, 6.1, 6.2) of the proprietary (sigh, I know) data analysis package IDL (rsinc.com) segfaults when trying to draw a simple bitmap (the IDL statement "tv,dist(5)" reproduces the bug). Considering that, e.g. IDL 5.5 has run on everything from RH7.3 forwards

Bug#418016: More software broken by libx11-6 (1.0.3-7) upgrade

2007-04-09 Thread Don Barry
Essentially every version (5.5, 5.6, 6.0, 6.1, 6.2) of the proprietary (sigh, I know) data analysis package IDL (rsinc.com) segfaults when trying to draw a simple bitmap (the IDL statement "tv,dist(5)" reproduces the bug). Considering that, e.g. IDL 5.5 has run on everything from RH7.3 forwards

Processed: forcibly merging 373723 377313 405046

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 > forcemerge 373723 377313 405046 Bug#373723: xbase-clients lost its menu entries Bug#377313: xbase-clients: xkil disappeared from X menu Bug#405046: Missing /usr/share/menu/xbase-clien

Bug#387422: xbase-clients: xrdb no longer works after NFS server restart

2007-04-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2007-04-09 16:51:42 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > What's the status of this bug? Did you find a fix/workaround? Does it > still happen with xbase-clients 7.2.ds2-1 (currently in experimental)? A "strace -f" shows that the include directories are stat'd, but they are not read. But in this case, w

Bug#418324: xterm: baffling weirdness with 9x15 font and some Unicode glyphs

2007-04-09 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:21:25PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:14:17AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 08:27:18PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > > grep'ing the code, I see some special case in wcwidth.c (the built-in > > > flavor) > > > whic

Bug#233707: xbase-clients: [xclock] cannot change font with command-line option or X resources

2007-04-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2007-04-09 22:12:15 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > About 3 years ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS > regarding xclock font/color not changing with cmdline options or X > resources. There has been some interesting replies since then. Does any > of you guys still have this pr

Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 338404 pending Bug#338404: initramfs-tools: /dev/[tp]ty[a-ep-z][0-9a-f] are created. This wastes time and RAM and does no good. There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 414792 pen

Bug#414792: marked as done (Debian doesn't ship cvt)

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:23:40 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#414792: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.2.99.905-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

xorg-server_1.2.99.905-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: xdmx-tools_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx-tools_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb xdmx_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb xnest_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xnest_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb xorg-server_1.2.99.905-2.

Processed: [bts-link] source package libx11

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package libx11 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report fo

Processed: [bts-link] source package xorg-server

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg-server > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status repo

Processed: reassign 396037 to xserver-xorg-video-intel

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 > reassign 396037 xserver-xorg-video-intel Bug#396037: Switching to VT while using 3d composite manager locks up computer Bug reassigned from package `libgl1-mesa-dri' to `xserver-xorg-

Re: backporting xserver-xorg-video-intel 1.9.94

2007-04-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 00:20:53 +0200, emisca wrote: > I would like to backport using pbuilder the new 2.0rc intel driver > that it's present in the experimental branch of debian. For what distribution are you trying to backport it? Assuming you mean etch for now... > Could anyone explain me w

backporting xserver-xorg-video-intel 1.9.94

2007-04-09 Thread emisca
I would like to backport using pbuilder the new 2.0rc intel driver that it's present in the experimental branch of debian. Could anyone explain me which is the correct chain of dependencies to have a well compiled xorg 1.2.99 server + mesa 6.5.2 + xserver-xorg-video-intel 1.9.94? I think it shoul

xorg-server_1.2.99.905-2_i386.changes is NEW

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Installer
xdmx-tools_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx-tools_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb xdmx_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb xnest_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xnest_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb xorg-server_1.2.99.905-2.diff.gz t

Processing of xorg-server_1.2.99.905-2_i386.changes

2007-04-09 Thread Archive Administrator
xorg-server_1.2.99.905-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xorg-server_1.2.99.905-2.dsc xorg-server_1.2.99.905-2.diff.gz xprint-common_1.2.99.905-2_all.deb xserver-xorg-core_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb xserver-xorg-dev_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb xdmx_1.2.99.905-

Bug#120724: marked as done (xbase-clients: [xftcache] doesn't use fonts.alias when generating XftCache files)

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:36:31 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#120724: xbase-clients: [xftcache] doesn't use fonts.alias when generating XftCache files has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#297097: marked as done (xsm: Bombs out if a client's Program property is non-executable)

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:19:09 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Problems delivering your mail has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#107382: marked as done (xbase-clients: [xgamma] only sets gamma for first screen)

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:19:09 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Problems delivering your mail has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Processing of xorg-server_1.2.99.905-2_i386.changes

2007-04-09 Thread Archive Administrator
xorg-server_1.2.99.905-2_i386.changes isn't signed with PGP/GnuPG Removing xorg-server_1.2.99.905-2_i386.changes, but keeping its associated files for now. Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

xorg-server: Changes to 'refs/tags/xorg-server-2_1.2.99.905-2'

2007-04-09 Thread Julien Cristau
Tag 'xorg-server-2_1.2.99.905-2' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-04-09 20:27 + Tagging upload of xorg-server 2:1.2.99.905-2 to experimental. Changes since xorg-server-2_1.2.99.905-1: Julien Cristau (3): Install the cvt and gtf utilities and their manpages. B

xorg-server: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

2007-04-09 Thread Julien Cristau
debian/changelog |6 -- debian/control | 26 +- debian/rules | 12 ++-- 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) New commits: commit 634e4d1c5aa3de83fdd4fd31443e2b9ab0ee5f7e Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon Apr 9 20

Processed: more xbase-clients bugs tagging

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 162787 +wontfix Bug#162787: xbase-clients: [xauth] doesn't work when .Xauthority-l and .Xauthority-c exist Tags were: upstream Tags added: wontfix > found 173433 1:7.2.ds2-1 Bug#173433: xbase-clients: [xcalc] RPN stack behaviour is wrong Bug mark

Bug#120724: xbase-clients: [xftcache] doesn't use fonts.alias when generating XftCache files

2007-04-09 Thread Philip Armstrong
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:39:40PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: About 5 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xftcache not using fonts.alias when generating XftCache files. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks.

Bug#297098: marked as done (xsm: lock files hang around when a session terminates unexpectedly)

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:16:01 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297098: xsm: lock files hang around when a session terminates unexpectedly has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#233707: xbase-clients: [xclock] cannot change font with command-line option or X resources

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 3 years ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS regarding xclock font/color not changing with cmdline options or X resources. There has been some interesting replies since then. Does any of you guys still have this problem? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug

Bug#297097: xsm: Bombs out if a client's Program property is non-executable

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 2 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xsm crashing if a client's Program property is non-executable. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE

Bug#187462: xbase-clients: [xcalc] need to change app-defaults for keyboard to work under Sawfish window manager

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 4 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xcalc requiring to change app-defaults for keyboard under sawfish. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Bug#107382: xbase-clients: [xgamma] only sets gamma for first screen

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 5 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xgamma only working for first screen. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Bug#120724: xbase-clients: [xftcache] doesn't use fonts.alias when generating XftCache files

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 5 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xftcache not using fonts.alias when generating XftCache files. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE

Bug#135035: marked as done (xbase-clients: [xhost] SEGV after sequence of incorrect calls)

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:37:59 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#135035: xbase-clients: [xhost] SEGV after sequence of incorrect calls has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#126821: xbase-clients: [bitmap] dies when pasting very large image

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 5 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding bitmap dying when pasting a very large image. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Processed: tagging xbase-clients bus

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 59308 1:7.2.ds2-1 Bug#59308: xbase-clients: [xrdb] fails with spaces in the -I path Bug marked as found in version 1:7.2.ds2-1. > found 50842 1:7.2.ds2-1 Bug#50842: xbase-clients: [xset] led # option doesn't (re)set LEDs as documented Bug#85415:

Bug#84199: marked as done (xbase-clients: [xrdb] two problems parsing comments)

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:41:41 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#84199: xbase-clients: [xrdb] two problems parsing comments has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#82804: marked as done (xbase-clients: [xmag] BadMatch during X_GetImage and then coredump)

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:23:46 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

xorg-server_1.2.99.903-2_i386.changes REJECTED

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Installer
=== If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#92726: marked as done (xbase-clients: [editres] SEGV when re-displaying resource box)

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:11:51 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#92726: xbase-clients: [editres] SEGV when re-displaying resource box has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#82804: xbase-clients: [xmag] BadMatch during X_GetImage and then coredump

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 6 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xmag crashing in XGetImage. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib

Bug#75344: xbase-clients: [xauth] needs to way to identify and remove stale xauth cookies

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 6 years ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS regarding xauth needing a way to identify/remove stake cookies. Did any of you guys reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Bug#50972: xbase-clients: [xwd] dumping wrong window

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 7 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xwd dumping the wrong window. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscr

Processed: tagging 50949

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 > tags 50949 + wontfix Bug#50949: xbase-clients: [xmodmap] all line numbers are off-by-one Tags were: upstream Tags added: wontfix > End of message, stopping processing here. Please c

xorg: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2007-04-09 Thread Christian Perrier
debian/changelog |1 debian/po/nl.po | 74 +++ 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) New commits: commit a0855d5fdf7725c1feccfa5215ae9b3dcb1fbc6f Author: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon Apr 9 19:35:45 2007

Bug#38261: marked as done (xbase-clients: [xlsfonts] processes patterns incorrectly)

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:29:48 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#38261: xbase-clients: [xlsfonts] processes patterns incorrectly has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#48934: marked as done (xbase-clients: [xkbcomp] segfaults with -I flag)

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:25:11 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#24302: marked as done (xbase-clients: [xinit] requires absolute path to client program (unclear manpage info))

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:21:40 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#24302: xbase-clients: [xinit] requires absolute path to client program (unclear manpage info) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#38261: xbase-clients: [xlsfonts] processes patterns incorrectly

2007-04-09 Thread Jerry Quinn (ibm)
Brice Goglin wrote: Hi, About 8 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xlsfonts incorrectly processing some patterns. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. This problem doesn't seem to be there any more in

Processed: bug 46892 is forwarded to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10575

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 > forwarded 46892 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10575 Bug#46892: xbase-clients: [xmessage] wrong window size displaying message with tabs Noted your statement that Bug h

Processed: tagging 48199

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 > tags 48199 + wontfix Bug#48199: xbase-clients: [xauth] can't handle IP changes Tags were: upstream Tags added: wontfix > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#38261: xbase-clients: [xlsfonts] processes patterns incorrectly

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 8 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xlsfonts incorrectly processing some patterns. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Bug#24239: xbase-clients: [xsm] fails to reload twm

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 9 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xsn failing to reload twm. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Bug#48934: xbase-clients: [xkbcomp] segfaults with -I flag

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 7 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xkbcomp segfaulting with the -I option. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#16089: xbase-clients: [editres] shows very big widget tree with some junk

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 9 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding editres displaying some junk within a very big widget tree. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#21788: xbase-clients: [xset] -q option falsely assumes XFree86-Misc extension to be present

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 9 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xset -q falsely assuming that the XFree86-Misc extension is present. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#347767: marked as done (xbase-clients: xkbcomp or xmodmap or libxkbfile or libxklavier problem don't start XKB)

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 17:57:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#347767: xbase-clients: xkbcomp or xmodmap or libxkbfile or libxklavier problem don't start XKB has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#94713: Returned mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Recipient address rejected: Unknown user (from barracudas.hull.ac.uk)

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
forwarded 94713 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10573 thank you The submitter's address is invalid but the bug and patch were clear enough to forward upstream anyway. Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT

Processed: Re: Returned mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Recipient address rejected: Unknown user (from barracudas.hull.ac.uk)

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 94713 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10573 Bug#94713: xbase-clients: [xmessage] gets its widget hierarchy wrong Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10573. > thank you

Bug#302685: marked as done (After removing gdm 'startx' wont start X)

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 17:44:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302685: After removing gdm 'startx' wont start X has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#347767: xbase-clients: xkbcomp or xmodmap or libxkbfile or libxklavier problem don't start XKB

2007-04-09 Thread Daniele Cruciani
Hi Brice, an year ago... yes, I think it was solved, or not? (maybe there was a workaround sudjested in another bug report .. ask to maintainer of udev package .. I remember something like that) I switched to ubuntu, then changed pc, I am sorry I could not test if it is reproducible, I think if

Bug#226865: marked as done (xbase-clients: xkbcomp always segfaults after update to newest package-version)

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 17:41:26 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#226865: xbase-clients: xkbcomp always segfaults after update to newest package-version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#345704: marked as done (xbase-clients: [xmodmap] Mouse buttons not well recognized)

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 17:30:05 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#345704: xbase-clients: [xmodmap] Mouse buttons not well recognized has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#144316: marked as done (xbase-clients: [xconsole] Debian menu entry needs to use '-file /dev/xconsole')

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 17:23:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#144316,xbase-clients: [xconsole] Debian menu entry needs to use '-file /dev/xconsole' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#94713: xbase-clients: [xmessage] gets its widget hierarchy wrong

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 6 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xmessage problems with its widget hierarchy. You provided a sort of patch which apparently still applies to latest release of xmessage. Does the problem still happen with Xorg/Etch? If so, I'll forward the bug upstream. Thanks,

Bug#302685: After removing gdm 'startx' wont start X

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 2 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding startx not starting X after removing gdm. Lots of things were discussed in this bug report. Did you reproduce the problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Bug#387422: xbase-clients: xrdb no longer works after NFS server restart

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi Vincent, What's the status of this bug? Did you find a fix/workaround? Does it still happen with xbase-clients 7.2.ds2-1 (currently in experimental)? Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#345704: xbase-clients: [xmodmap] Mouse buttons not well recognized

2007-04-09 Thread Alexandre Ahmim-Richard
Brice Goglin wrote: Hi, Hi, About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding your mouse button not being well recognized. The upstream bug that you said could be relevant has been fixed since then. So, did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will cl

Bug#362299: xbase-clients: [xrdb] (apparently) changed cpp invocation switches

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi Giacomo, About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xrdb having apparently changed the way it invokes cpp. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Bug#347767: xbase-clients: xkbcomp or xmodmap or libxkbfile or libxklavier problem don't start XKB

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi Daniele, About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding gnome complaining about XKB errors on startup. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E

Bug#345704: xbase-clients: [xmodmap] Mouse buttons not well recognized

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding your mouse button not being well recognized. The upstream bug that you said could be relevant has been fixed since then. So, did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks

Bug#196680: xbase-clients: [xwd] locks display

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 4 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xwd locking another display when killed with ctrl-c. I can't reproduce here. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#183312: xbase-clients: [xman] buffer overflow in MANPATH handling

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 4 years ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS regarding a buffer overflow in MANPATH handling causing xman to segfault. Did any of you guys reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUB

Bug#418324: xterm: baffling weirdness with 9x15 font and some Unicode glyphs

2007-04-09 Thread Info, GuiaArtistica.com.ar
I am a victim of abuse.. a person put my email in much mailing list... PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE ME Guia Artistica www.guiaartistica.com.ar -Mensaje original- De: Branden Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Lunes, 09 de Abril de 2007 02:14 a.m. Para: Thomas Dickey; [EMAIL PROT

Bug#156497: xbase-clients: [xman] apropos does not work

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 5 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding apropos not working, and you said last year that it was still not working, even if Denis couldn't reproduce the problem. Did you reproduce? With Xorg/Etch? If so, could you give some hints about how to reproduce? Thanks, Brice

Bug#175296: xbase-clients: [xvidtune] SIGFPE crash

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 4 years ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS regarding xvidtune crashing with a floating point exception. Did any of you guys reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#115497: xbase-clients: [xsm] crashes non-deterministically

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 5 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xsm crashing non-deterministically. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "un

Bug#133151: xbase-clients: [xmag] SEGV in GetMinIntensity() when trying to magnify top edge of screen

2007-04-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, About 5 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xmag segfaulting when trying to magnify the top edge of the screen. The bug has been reported as unreproducible, and I still can't reproduce it here. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close

Bug#418377: Don't automatically set highest possible resolution as default

2007-04-09 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 01 April 2007 14:39, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > A very high default resolution: 1920×1200 > I think this is the theoretical maximum the CRT monitor (IIyama > HM903D/DT) and VGA card, but in practise it was not OK. > I think it is better to use a maximum default resolution of 1200x1024 > f

Processed: Reassign

2007-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 417051 -1 Bug#417051: installation report Bug 417051 cloned as bug 418377. > reassign -1 xserver-xorg-core Bug#418377: installation report Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `xserver-xorg-core'. > retitle -1 Don't automaticall