On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 10:28 +1100, Vincent Ho wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:23:43AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > Can you run gtk-window-decorator built against libmetacity0 >= 1:2.15.21
> > with an older version, or vice versa?
>
> That's a good question, I haven't tried it. I will sa
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:29:00AM -0600, John Zbesko wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestion. I am able to work with the machine by
> shifting to a different tty, CNTL-ALT-F2, logging in and killing the X
> processes.
>
> On a different note, I found:
>
> #401524: xorg hangs on Ultra1 with cgsix car
Hi,
Dave Love, le Sun 31 Oct 2004 13:33:15 +, a écrit :
> The glyph for lambda (0x3BB) in
> -Misc-Fixed-Medium-R-Normal--13-120-75-75-C-70-ISO10646-1 (at least)
> is odd -- it doesn't look like a lambda to me. Perhaps there's a good
> reason for it in terms of modern Greek usage, but it doesn
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:23:43AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Can you run gtk-window-decorator built against libmetacity0 >= 1:2.15.21
> with an older version, or vice versa?
That's a good question, I haven't tried it. I will say that my rebuild
of 0.3.6-1 still depends only on libmetacity0 >
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> found 252045 1:1.0.0-4
Bug#252045: xfonts-base: [ClearlyU] off-by-one error with some glyphs
Bug marked as found in version 1:1.0.0-4.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> found 278928 1:1.0.0-4
Bug#278928: xfonts-base: glyphs for codepoints U+2198 (SOUTH EAST ARROW) and
U+2199 (SOUTH WEST ARROW) are swapped
Bug marked as found in version 1:1.0.0-4.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> found 289078 1:1.0.0-4
Bug#289078: unreadable bold chars in xbase-fonts
-*-clean-medium-r-*-*-*-S-*-*-*-*-*-* fonts (where S <= 100)
Bug marked as found in version 1:1.0.0-4.
>
End
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:59:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#126210: xfonts-base: 5x7 bold practically unreadable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:22:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#84394: xfonts-base: changes to 6x13bold are ugly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Hi,
About 3 years ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug (#214449 and
#213286, merged since) in the Debian BTS regarding iso8859-1 font
problems in several programs, especially emacs. Did any of you guys
reproduce this problem recently? With latest Xorg/Etch? If not, I will
close this bug in the
Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
> Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>> Did you have a chance to try to reproduce this problem on a Debian Etch
>> with Xorg ? Unfortunately, XFree86/Sarge won't get fixed anymore.
>>
>
> No, sorry. And I cannot really test because my Internet connection
> is payed by traffic.
>
Hi Paul,
Did you have a chance to try to reproduce this problem on a Debian Etch
with Xorg ? Unfortunately, XFree86/Sarge won't get fixed anymore.
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brice Goglin wrote:
> Did you have a chance to try to reproduce this problem on a Debian Etch
> with Xorg ? Unfortunately, XFree86/Sarge won't get fixed anymore.
No, sorry. And I cannot really test because my Internet connection
is payed by traffic.
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:13:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393154: xfonts-base: possible incorrect font paths?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 151417 + wontfix
Bug#151417: xfonts-base: Please use update-alternatives for mouse cursor font.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
>
End of message, stopping processing
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:41:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#275157: xfonts-base could Suggests: xfonts-base-transcoded
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:37:07 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230696: RFE: Update Xfree86 encoding files to Xfree86
V4.4.0RC2 to include font encoding fixes and enhancements
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:23:54 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318140: xfonts-100dpi: doesn't remove cleanly due to
fonts.cache-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:06:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#197918: xfonts-100dpi: Helvetica (adobe) not exported
through xfs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Accepted:
x11proto-input-dev_1.4.1-1_all.deb
to pool/main/x/x11proto-input/x11proto-input-dev_1.4.1-1_all.deb
x11proto-input_1.4.1-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/x11proto-input/x11proto-input_1.4.1-1.diff.gz
x11proto-input_1.4.1-1.dsc
to pool/main/x/x11proto-input/x11proto-input_1.4.1-1.dsc
x11pro
x11proto-input_1.4.1-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
x11proto-input_1.4.1-1.dsc
x11proto-input_1.4.1.orig.tar.gz
x11proto-input_1.4.1-1.diff.gz
x11proto-input-dev_1.4.1-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
XInput.h |2 +-
configure.ac |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit c608d82c6b5b87ddc8d14862f528bdd69f5f5b72
Author: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu Feb 15 16:33:07 2007 +0200
bump to 1.4.1
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.a
Tag 'x11proto-input-1.4.1-1' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at
2007-02-15 15:11 +0100
Tagging upload of x11proto-input 1.4.1-1 to experimental.
Changes since x11proto-input-1.4-1:
Daniel Stone:
bump to 1.4.1
Julien Cristau:
Merge branch 'upstream-experimental' into de
Makefile.in |4 -
XInput.h |2
configure| 160 ---
configure.ac |2
debian/changelog |6 ++
mkinstalldirs| 89 +++---
6 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
N
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 05:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> +SERVERABI = $(shell cat /usr/share/xserver-xorg/serverabiver || true)
> +SERVER_DEPENDS = xserver-xorg-core (>= $(SERVERABI))
What's the || true for? Looks like SERVER_DEPENDS relies on the file
being there anyway.
> This means that
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 16:18 -0500, David Lowe wrote:
> The following page has a nice workaround
>
> http://www.sabishiro.net/~tyuyu/tdiary/?date=20070124
This seems to confirm what I saw discussed upstream at X.org before:
It's a bug in Java, not compiz. Please reassign to the Java package
you're
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 16:33 +1100, Vincent Ho wrote:
> Package: compiz
> Version: 0.3.6-1
> Severity: important
>
>
> compiz-gtk 0.3.6-1 still has the conflict with libmetacity0 >= 1:2.15.21
> but I think this problem was fixed as of 0.3.4 or so. I'm running
> 0.3.6-1 with gnome 2.6 on my laptop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 185211 wontfix
Bug#185211: xutils: update-fonts-scale: No way to invoke to not ignore
directories outside of /etc/X11/fonts, e.g., for AbiWord
There were no tags set.
Tags added
OK, ran it for a few hours and finally got a BT, I don't think this is
very informative though, which package contains the Debugging Symbols?
Or should I run Xorg in a special way?
I used the following docs to understand what to do:
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/DebuggingTheXserver
but to my
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 07:53:22AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> > I think that at least the .dir files ought to find their way back to
>> > /etc/X11/xkb to let users add their own configs, but I don't think this
>> > should be considered RC -- and that
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 07:53:22AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> > I think that at least the .dir files ought to find their way back to
> > /etc/X11/xkb to let users add their own configs, but I don't think this
> > should be considered RC -- and that we are in fact better off not changing
> > this
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> severity 410903 important
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:37:42PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> I think that it is clear that these files actually are configuration
>> files. This has been discussed for example in #326637. Reading through
>> th
tor 2007-02-15 klockan 01:45 +0100 skrev Brice Goglin:
> Hi,
>
> About 8 months ago, you guys reported bugs to the Debian BTS (#367410,
> #368240 and #369620, merged since)**, or replied to one of them, about
> fixed font problems in X and/or emacs.
> Did any of you reproduce this problem recently
33 matches
Mail list logo
