On Mon, Feb 5, 2007 at 01:39:34 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Indeed, this is a regression from the transition to modular X, the code
> implementing a fallback from vm86 to x86emu isn't getting built.
> In hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/int10/linux.c, this code is dependent on
> the DoSubModules ma
Hi Juhapekka,
About 1 year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding uxterm
having problems with zsh and luit. Did you see the followups and
reproduce this problem recently?
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Your message dated Mon, 05 Feb 2007 22:52:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#180156: xutils: xon calls program hostname in wrong way
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Mon, 05 Feb 2007 22:38:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in version 1:7.1.ds-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Your message dated Mon, 05 Feb 2007 22:43:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#26976: xbase-clients: [xon] does not catch its own -debug
option
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Hello,
messing around with the xorg repository i finally got it to work by compiling
the i810 module by myself.
git-clone git://gitweb.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel
cd xf86-video-intel
git checkout modesetting
git-pull -s ours
./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr
make
sudo make install
On Mon, Feb 5, 2007 at 18:29:04 +0100, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> Ah, sorry, then, but in this case, why is the line in the changelog
> yet?:
>
Because, as I said, there is still a versioned build-dep.
> Oh, and take care of the urgency, it is 'lo' now instead of 'low'.
It is
El lunes, 5 de febrero de 2007 17:49, Julien Cristau escribió:
> > Hello, do you know that diff is 'inverted'? I mean, the modified
> > version seems to be the old one, doesn't it?
>
> I added a versioned dependency in an earlier commit, and then rechecked
> the code, and the versioned depende
On Mon, Feb 5, 2007 at 17:39:39 +0100, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> > index d34e22e..17942f7 100644
> > --- a/debian/control
> > +++ b/debian/control
> > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ Description: X11 Input extension library
> > Package: libxi-dev
> > Sect
El sábado, 3 de febrero de 2007 21:23, Julien Cristau escribió:
> debian/changelog |4 ++--
> debian/control |2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> New commits:
> commit b422e54151c24cecc0a6611607e479988a8eee0a
> Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:
El lunes, 5 de febrero de 2007 15:19, Colm Connolly escribió:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm trying to install libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev so I can get GL/GLwDrawA.h
> for some code I need to compile, however this requires (according to
> aptitude) removing pretty much all of X.
>
> Is it possible to install li
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to install libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev so I can get GL/GLwDrawA.h
for some code I need to compile, however this requires (according to
aptitude) removing pretty much all of X.
Is it possible to install libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev without nuking X in the process?
This is what aptitu
On Mon, Feb 5, 2007 at 01:39:34 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Indeed, this is a regression from the transition to modular X, the code
> implementing a fallback from vm86 to x86emu isn't getting built.
> In hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/int10/linux.c, this code is dependent on
> the DoSubModules ma
13 matches
Mail list logo
