On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 20:19 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:26:53AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 17:45 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > >
> > > Should we ship our driver with this patch as well?
> >
> > Eventually, yes, but I'm not sure it's correc
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-06-13 00:51:09 -0400 (Tue, 13 Jun 2006)
New Revision: 2327
Added:
tags/font/xfonts-utils/xfonts-utils-1:1.0.0-6/
Log:
Tag upload of xfonts-utils-1:1.0.0-6 to unstable
Copied: tags/font/xfonts-utils/xfonts-utils-1:1.0.0-6 (from rev 2326,
trunk/font/xfonts-utils)
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-06-13 00:28:55 -0400 (Tue, 13 Jun 2006)
New Revision: 2326
Modified:
trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/changelog
trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/control
Log:
* Put x11-common back to Depends and unversion it to avoid the unholy
wrath of vorlon. Urgency still medium
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-06-13 00:18:24 -0400 (Tue, 13 Jun 2006)
New Revision: 2325
Added:
tags/font/xfonts-utils/xfonts-utils-1:1.0.0-5/
Log:
Tag upload of xfonts-utils-1:1.0.0-5 to unstable
Copied: tags/font/xfonts-utils/xfonts-utils-1:1.0.0-5 (from rev 2324,
trunk/font/xfonts-utils)
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372858: fixed in xfonts-utils 1:1.0.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372858: fixed in xfonts-utils 1:1.0.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-06-12 22:55:43 -0400 (Mon, 12 Jun 2006)
New Revision: 2324
Modified:
trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/xfonts-utils.install
Log:
Fix install file for manpage suffixes
Modified: trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/xfonts-utils.install
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-06-12 22:49:10 -0400 (Mon, 12 Jun 2006)
New Revision: 2323
Modified:
trunk/font/xfonts-utils/bdftopcf-X11R7.0-1.0.0/Makefile.in
trunk/font/xfonts-utils/bdftopcf-X11R7.0-1.0.0/aclocal.m4
trunk/font/xfonts-utils/bdftopcf-X11R7.0-1.0.0/configure
trunk/font/xfon
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:16:31 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372687: Ordinary user can't start xorg
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-06-12 22:37:03 -0400 (Mon, 12 Jun 2006)
New Revision: 2322
Modified:
trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/control
Log:
Typofix
Modified: trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/control
===
--- trunk/font/xfonts-utils/
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-06-12 22:22:37 -0400 (Mon, 12 Jun 2006)
New Revision: 2321
Modified:
trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/changelog
trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/compat
trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/control
trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/rules
Log:
* Version x11-common dep and
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 05:54:04PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 12:26:03AM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
> > Package: xorg
> > Version: 1:7.0.20
> >
> > Under Etch, an ordinary user can't start the windowing system.
> > In this test, /etc/rc2.d has been edited so that
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-06-12 21:46:19 -0400 (Mon, 12 Jun 2006)
New Revision: 2320
Modified:
trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/changelog
Log:
Prepare changelog for release
Modified: trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/changelog
===
--
Package: xdm
Version: 1:1.0.4-2
Severity: minor
File: /usr/share/man/man1/xdm.1x.gz
The xdm man page under "DisplayManager.authDir" and under the "FILES"
section shows /etc/X11/xdm as the location for the authorization
files, but they seem to actually go in /var/lib/xdm/authdir/authfiles.
-- Sys
Package: xterm
Version: 210-3
Severity: minor
File: /usr/share/doc/xterm/README.Debian
README.Debian refers to the ncurses-term package for the xterm
terminfo definitions, but I see there's definitions in the
ncurses-base package these days. Perhaps it should be referring to
that one (assuming it
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:26:53AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 17:45 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 08:31:14PM +0200, Michel D??nzer wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 20:14 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:34:52PM +
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
> > It looks a bit like this:
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/05/msg00518.html
> >
> > Although not affecting as many apps..
>
> Well, in any case it seems like it's a bug in the X libraries so I'm
> reassigning it t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 368858 lyx-xforms
Bug#368858: lyx-xforms segfaults
Bug reassigned from package `libx11-6' to `lyx-xforms'.
> tag 368858 help
Bug#368858: lyx-xforms segfaults
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pleas
reassign 368858 lyx-xforms
tag 368858 help
thanks
Denis Barbier:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
> > > It looks a bit like this:
> > >
> > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/05/msg00518.html
> > >
> > > Although not affecting as many apps..
> >
> > Well,
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:05:10AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> Hi Nathanael,
>
>
> first of all, let me say that I really appreciate your willingness to do
> bug triaging.
>
> However, I'm still not convinced that blindly reassigning old bugs to
> the modular packages is a good approach, ma
Hi Harley,
you wrote:
> The specific issue I am seeing is libxft1 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 has
>
> Depends: xfree86-common, libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libexpat1 (>=
> 1.95.8), libfontconfig1 (>= 2.3.0), libfreetype6 (>= 2.1.5-1),
> libxext6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxrender1
>
> when it should have:
>
FYI: The status of the xfonts-encodings source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.0.0-5
Current version: 1:1.0.0-5.1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more in
FYI: The status of the libice source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 1:1.0.0-3
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more informa
I was mistaken earlier.
The specific issue I am seeing is libxft1 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 has
Depends: xfree86-common, libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libexpat1 (>=
1.95.8), libfontconfig1 (>= 2.3.0), libfreetype6 (>= 2.1.5-1),
libxext6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxrender1
when it should have:
Depends: xfre
Hi,
This is just a quick followup note, that this bug still exists.
Apparently, it's not as simple as I had first thought: it only happens
once in a while (race condition?).
My window manager is ratpoison, which automatically maximizes all windows,
and I've configured 'C-t c' to spawn xterm. Usua
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 16:21 +0200, Josef Spillner wrote:
>
> > Adjusting the description and severity to the fact that this is an
> > unsupported configuration which accidentally doesn't get rejected.
>
> But how does this relate to the kernel lockup? Should I file a separate
> report
> against
Package: x11-common
Version: 7.0.20
* The exact and complete text of any error messages printed or
logged. This is very important!
The problem is prerequisites for packages which have not yet been
updated to use x11-common instead of or in addition to xfree86-common.
* Exactly what you ty
Alle 16:11, lunedì, 12. giugno 2006, hai scritto:
> See the radeon(4) manpage about MergedFB.
Ah thanks. I'll give it a try.
> Adjusting the description and severity to the fact that this is an
> unsupported configuration which accidentally doesn't get rejected.
But how does this relate to the k
retitle 372920 Accidentally allows mixing of screens with UseFBDev on and off
with a single device
severity 372920 minor
kthxbye
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 15:14 +0200, Josef Spillner wrote:
>
> One of the screens has framebuffer enabled, the other one doesn't.
That's asking for trouble, the X drive
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:43:34PM +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> when I look at the output of xrandr I see negative refresh rates not
> only confusing me but also e.g. gnome-display-properties (i.e. I can
> no longer change resolutions on the fly with that tool)
This is a known issue with Merg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 368858 - pending
Bug#368858: lyx-xforms segfaults
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 372920 Accidentally allows mixing of screens with UseFBDev on and off
> with a single device
Bug#372920: Subject: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Xinerama crashes X and kernel
Changed Bug title.
> severity 372920 minor
Bug#372920: Accidentally allows
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 372918 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6966
Bug#372918: negative refresh rates in xrandr
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6966.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 368858 libx11-6
Bug#368858: lyx-xforms segfaults
Bug reassigned from package `lyx-xforms' to `libx11-6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 358751 xserver-xorg-input-evdev
Bug#358751: tilt buttons are inverted with MX 1000 mouse
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg' to `xserver-xorg-input-evdev'.
>
End of m
Package: x11-common
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6
Severity: important
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ch
reassign 368858 libx11-6
thanks
James Stone:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:10:44PM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
> > tag 368858 unreproducible
> > thanks
> >
> > James Stone:
> > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > > 0xa7dd0cb8 in XFindOnExtensionList () from /usr/lib/libX11.so
package: xlibs
severity: wishlist
Hello!
Since the last weekend I am the proud owner of this special
Linux-keyboard manufactured by Cherry [1]. It has only one problem: It
does not work under Linux ;)
After plugging the keyboard in (PS/2) I changed the line
Option "XkbModel" "pc105"
in /etc/X11
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.5.8.0-1
Severity: important
I'm using Xinerama to put the CRT output and the external VGA output on
top of each other, i.e. to enable the external VGA, on a standard iBook
machine running Debian.
One of the screens has framebuffer enabled, the other one
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.5.8.0-1
Severity: normal
when I look at the output of xrandr I see negative refresh rates not
only confusing me but also e.g. gnome-display-properties (i.e. I can
no longer change resolutions on the fly with that tool)
$ xrandr
SZ:Pixels
David wroteL
> Yeah, I realized after I wrote the above that there was no fix. This is...
> bad.
;( It's a damn, damn shame no one noticed earlier. We could have asked
the freetype maintainer to hold back from uploading 2.2 until it was
sorted out. No use crying over spilt milk, however, I suppo
Package: xorg
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n
Hi,
In order to have up-to-date po files in the source package, please
consider adding debconf-updatepo to the clean target of debian/rules.
Currently:
$ msgfmt --statistics fr.po
124 translated messages.
$ debconf-updatepo
$ msgfmt --statistics fr.po
124
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 365875 xfonts-utils
Bug#365875: No Text in Gtk widgets of xmms
Bug reassigned from package `xmms' to `xfonts-utils'.
> forcemerge 372858 365875
Bug#372858: update-scale-fonts: fails on empty dirs
Bug#365875: No Text in Gtk widgets of xmms
Forc
Author: vorlon
Date: 2006-06-12 06:53:32 -0400 (Mon, 12 Jun 2006)
New Revision: 2319
Modified:
trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/local/update-fonts-dir
Log:
minor fix-up of a shell syntax oops
Modified: trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/local/update-fonts-dir
hi,
i've got also this bug in xerver-xorg 7.0.21:
* if xorg.conf is customized, nothing is done
* if i remove my xorg.conf and run dpkg-reconfigure, no new file created
i noticed that on my current box, i doesn't have a warning, and on a new
installed box i've got a warning telling that the file
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 372858 pending
Bug#372858: update-scale-fonts: fails on empty dirs
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Author: vorlon
Date: 2006-06-12 05:09:28 -0400 (Mon, 12 Jun 2006)
New Revision: 2318
Modified:
trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/changelog
trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/local/update-fonts-dir
Log:
Update update-fonts-dir to operate on both the old and new font
paths, regardless of arguments pa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 366948
Bug#366948: xfig can't find fonts
Bug#362911: gsfonts-x11: Fonts not installed properly
Disconnected #366948 from all other report(s).
> clone 366948 -1
Bug#366948: xfig can't find fonts
Bug 366948 cloned as bug 372858.
> merge 366948 3
Author: vorlon
Date: 2006-06-12 04:16:24 -0400 (Mon, 12 Jun 2006)
New Revision: 2317
Modified:
trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/local/update-fonts-scale
Log:
Further fixes to update-fonts-scale to ensure we *remove* any
old files in the event that there are no longer fonts with which to
populate
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:40:03PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > I think the patch might need a few more tweaks still, though; I'll ponder it
> > and commit a fix to the svn repo this weekend.
> Nice, thanks. But see comments below about xfonts-utils.postinst.
> > > - Steve, despite you talk
50 matches
Mail list logo
