On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 22:40 +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
>
> Well, I think that confirming that a bug exists before reassigning is a
> more
> tedious and long process than a former reassign and latter treatment. There
> are plenty of open bugs, and the amount of people that I can
adorable ruussian Hussy in poono!
http://fatcatcam.info/igmerapon.htm?gfibjW-M.YbRQR,gfibjW,VSd
R_E_M_O_\/__E
http://fatcatcam.info
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author: bubulle
Date: 2006-05-17 22:20:31 -0400 (Wed, 17 May 2006)
New Revision: 2168
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/po/gl.po
Log:
Galician translation update
Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
===
Le mercredi 17 mai 2006 à 12:26 -0500, Donald King a écrit :
> Ever since a GNOME upgrade around late April, I haven't been able to use
> GNOME at all. By downgrading to Sarge versions of the kernel, X, and
> GNOME, I narrowed it down to GNOME, although not to any particular
> package. However, i
Do nbot ignore me please,
I found your email somewhere and now decided to write you.
Ia am coming to your place in few weeks and thought we
can meet each other. Leat me bknow if you do not mind.
I aam a nice pretty gairl.a Don't reply to this email.a
Emabil me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 17:05:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326755: bug fixed, please close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
El martes, 16 de mayo de 2006 07:46, Michel Dänzer escribió:
> Hi David,
>
> I'll only comment briefly based on some of the titles, as I don't have
> time to look through all these, but in general, shouldn't we first
> confirm that a bug is still there before reassigning like this?
Hello,
I cannot reproduce this bug anymore. In fact it could have been closed
since October 2005.
Best regards,
Bastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xserver-xorg-input-aiptek
Version: 1:1.0.0.5-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
With :
InputDevice"stylusC""AlwaysCore"
in Section "ServerLayout"
and :
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "stylusC"
Driver "aiptek"
Option "Device" "/dev/input/event4"
Option "Type" "stylus"
Option "Mode" "absol
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 14:09:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Author: bubulle
Date: 2006-05-17 08:14:34 -0400 (Wed, 17 May 2006)
New Revision: 2167
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/po/fr.po
Log:
French translation updated (and first review)
Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
=
Author: bubulle
Date: 2006-05-17 08:10:51 -0400 (Wed, 17 May 2006)
New Revision: 2166
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/po/ja.po
Log:
Unfuzzy Japanese translation
Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/po/ja.po
===
--- trunk/debian/
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 23:45 -0400, Brad Corsello wrote:
> Package: xbase-clients
> Version: 1:7.0.1-2
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Why was xorgcfg removed from the package?
AFAIK it's broken upstream in 7.0, seems to be fixed in 7.1 though.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://t
Hire,
i am here sitting in the internet caffe. Found your email and
decidead to write. I might be coming to your place in 14 days,
so I decided to email you. May be we can meet? I am 25 y.o.
girl. I have a picture if you want. No need to reply here as
this is not my email. Write me at [EMAIL PROT
Hi,
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20060516 21:52:29 -0400]:
>
> On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 03:30:24AM +0100, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xorg
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > [snipped]
> >
> > Digging through Google I happened upon a patch being applied that actually
> > turned o
Is there a good reason why we are waiting for upstream to fix this instead
of fixing those wrong references right away?
This would save a lot of people from daily mails by cron and from having to
change those manpages manually if they don't want to be reminded every day.
Thanks,
Thomas
--
"Feel
16 matches
Mail list logo
