Bug#365259: xfs fails to start

2006-05-08 Thread Alexander Reinholdt
Am Dienstag 09 Mai 2006 01:36 schrieb David Nusinow: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:13:06PM +0200, Alexander Reinholdt wrote: > > Package: xfs > > Version: 1:1.0.1-4 > > Severity: important > > > > xfs fails to start showing the following error message: > > > > Setting up X font server socket directo

Bug#366098: marked as done (Encoding Directory Wrong)

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2006 01:58:18 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#366098: Encoding Directory Wrong has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#365502: marked as done (libxvmc1: Unable to open configuration file.)

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2006 01:33:17 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365502: libxvmc1: Unable to open configuration file. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#363089: marked as done (xserver-xorg: Does not install, pre-inst error, dependencies)

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2006 01:35:40 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363089: xserver-xorg: Does not install, pre-inst error, dependencies has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#366097: marked as done (Encoding path is still wrong)

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2006 22:32:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#366097: fixed in libfontenc 1:1.0.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#364530: marked as done (xfonts-utils: needless heirarchy change under /etc/X11/fonts)

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2006 22:17:41 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364530: fixed in xfonts-utils 1:1.0.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2119 - tags/lib/libfontenc

2006-05-08 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-05-09 01:23:38 -0400 (Tue, 09 May 2006) New Revision: 2119 Added: tags/lib/libfontenc/libfontenc-1:1.0.1-6/ Log: Tag upload of libfontenc-1:1.0.1-6 to unstable Copied: tags/lib/libfontenc/libfontenc-1:1.0.1-6 (from rev 2118, trunk/lib/libfontenc) -- To UNSUBSCR

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2118 - tags/debian/xorg

2006-05-08 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-05-09 01:18:00 -0400 (Tue, 09 May 2006) New Revision: 2118 Added: tags/debian/xorg/xorg-1:7.0.18/ Log: Tag upload of xorg-1:7.0.18 to unstable Copied: tags/debian/xorg/xorg-1:7.0.18 (from rev 2117, trunk/debian/xorg) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2117 - tags/font/xfonts-utils

2006-05-08 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-05-09 01:14:00 -0400 (Tue, 09 May 2006) New Revision: 2117 Added: tags/font/xfonts-utils/xfonts-utils-1:1.0.0-4/ Log: Tag upload of xfonts-utils-1:1.0.0-4 to unstable Copied: tags/font/xfonts-utils/xfonts-utils-1:1.0.0-4 (from rev 2116, trunk/font/xfonts-utils)

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2116 - trunk/lib/libfontenc/debian

2006-05-08 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-05-09 01:07:40 -0400 (Tue, 09 May 2006) New Revision: 2116 Modified: trunk/lib/libfontenc/debian/changelog trunk/lib/libfontenc/debian/rules Log: generate other encodings (the former one did not exist at all). Thanks * Run dh_install with --list-missing Modifie

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2115 - trunk/debian/xorg/debian

2006-05-08 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-05-09 01:01:30 -0400 (Tue, 09 May 2006) New Revision: 2115 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog trunk/debian/xorg/debian/control Log: Remove strange duplicate of xlibmesa-gl Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2114 - in trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian: . local

2006-05-08 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-05-09 00:53:27 -0400 (Tue, 09 May 2006) New Revision: 2114 Modified: trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/changelog trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/local/update-fonts-alias trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/local/update-fonts-alias.8 trunk/font/xfonts-utils/debian/loc

Processed: Re: Bug#366488: foomatic-gui crashes on load - libXft

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 366488 libxft2 Bug#366488: foomatic-gui crashes on load - libXft Bug reassigned from package `foomatic-gui' to `libxft2'. > merge 366488 350113 Bug#350113: libxft2: "FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden" disappeared since version 2.1.7-1, apps depends on th

Bug#366111: marked as done (Xserver X.Org restarts after logging in)

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2006 22:49:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#366111: xserver-xorg: This bug is fixed in 7.0.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#365259: xfs fails to start

2006-05-08 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:13:06PM +0200, Alexander Reinholdt wrote: > Package: xfs > Version: 1:1.0.1-4 > Severity: important > > xfs fails to start showing the following error message: > > Setting up X font server socket directory /tmp/.font-unix...done. > Starting X font server: xfs/usr/bin/xf

Bug#362835: marked as done (xbase-clients: app-defaults aren't used?)

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2006 18:52:58 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#362835: solved has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#362835: solved

2006-05-08 Thread Jon-o Addleman
Looks like this was my fault - I was testing some things to try to understand the whole process of getting X running (because of the recent bugs in the /usr/bin/startx script) and had put some things in ~/.xinitrc by mistake! Everything appears to be working just fine now. Sorry about that! -- J

Bug#362977: renders X.org 7 unusuable for many...

2006-05-08 Thread Gunter Ohrner
Hi! This bug currently renders X.org 7 from Debian unusuable for me and forced me to freeze X and all dependencies. Is there any estimate when a fixed version will be uploaded to unstable? Greetings, Gunter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.5.8.0-1 MIGRATED to testing

2006-05-08 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the xserver-xorg-video-ati source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:6.5.7.3-3 Current version: 1:6.5.8.0-1 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for

Bug#366166: marked as done (What happened to intl keyboard layout (mutli-key)?)

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 8 May 2006 22:53:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#366166: What happened to intl keyboard layout (mutli-key)? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#366355: This may be caused by incorrect display number selection

2006-05-08 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Looks like I've faced something similar to this bug, and seems that it is caused by incorrect choice of dispaly number by remote sshd. Look: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ssh -X sercond No mail. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> echo $DISPLAY localhost:10.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> xterm xterm Xt error: Can't open displa

Bug#366427: xfonts-encodings: circular dependency: doesn't need to depend on xutils

2006-05-08 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Package: xfonts-encodings Version: 1.0.0-2 Severity: minor I see the following build-dependencies: xutils -> xfonts-utils -> xfonts-encodings -> xutils which makes building any of these packages a bit harder than necessary, since AFAICS xfonts-encodings doesn't need xutils to build. At least h

Bug#366355: libx11: ssh -X between Sarges XF86 and Sids Xorg7 broken

2006-05-08 Thread Xavier Bestel
Le lundi 08 mai 2006 à 16:10 +0200, Michel Dänzer a écrit : > On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 16:04 +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 11:04:31AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > > Difficult. There's no X Server running on that machine and it's located > > > > 1000 km away from

Bug#366355: libx11: ssh -X between Sarges XF86 and Sids Xorg7 broken

2006-05-08 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 11:04:31AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Difficult. There's no X Server running on that machine and it's located > > 1000 km away from me (Karlsruhe <-> Rostock). > I mean the X server on your local machine. Something like > ssh -R6011:localhost:6000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > s

Bug#366355: libx11: ssh -X between Sarges XF86 and Sids Xorg7 broken

2006-05-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 16:04 +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 11:04:31AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > Difficult. There's no X Server running on that machine and it's located > > > 1000 km away from me (Karlsruhe <-> Rostock). > > I mean the X server on your local mac

Bug#116507: cheryl blankenship

2006-05-08 Thread Andrew
Hey, cheryl blankenship Pharm for cheryl blankenship is ready. Please re-confirm Zip. http://geocities.com/LilianaMartin2043 Your name as per our records: cheryl blankenship your street if wrong order please help us to correct it Just visit our site above to make sure. Thank you, Andrew

Bug#365850: xserver-xorg-video-ati: gstreamer 0.8's xvimage sinks lets the server crash

2006-05-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 12:32 +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:57:25AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 13:54 +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > >> The following pipeline crashes my X server: > >> gst-launch-0.8 videotestsrc ! blaat ! xvimagesink > >>

Bug#365850: xserver-xorg-video-ati: gstreamer 0.8's xvimage sinks lets the server crash

2006-05-08 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:57:25AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 13:54 +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: >> The following pipeline crashes my X server: >> gst-launch-0.8 videotestsrc ! blaat ! xvimagesink >> >> Full X log and config is attached. Video card is a Radeon X80

Bug#366355: libx11: ssh -X between Sarges XF86 and Sids Xorg7 broken

2006-05-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 10:43 +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:27:52AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > Does it work if you connect to the X server directly instead of via ssh? > > Difficult. There's no X Server running on that machine and it's located > 1000 km away fr

Bug#366190: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Error: couldn't find RGB GLX visual w/ radeon 9250 (r200) on amd64

2006-05-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 18:35 +0200, Volker Schlecht wrote: > > Not sure what you're referring to; again, we really need *full* config > > and log files (why do people tend to ignore the explicit request for > > full files these days? *sigh*). > > We're not as good as the users in the golden age, h

Bug#366355: libx11: ssh -X between Sarges XF86 and Sids Xorg7 broken

2006-05-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 07:43 +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 07:28:19AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > It doesn't matter whether I use ssh -X or ssh -Y. The result is the same. > > Does it work with ssh -Y? > > ;-) D'oh, I suppose that was too early in the morning.