Bug#349462: xterm: wrong update-alternatives man page x-terminal-emulator.1.gz

Package: xterm Version: 208-3.1 Severity: normal I get the following error: dixsept:~> man x-terminal-emulator man: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/x-terminal-emulator.1.gz is a dangling symlink No manual entry for x-terminal-emulator dixsept:~> update-alternatives --display x-terminal-emulator x-t

Processed: Re: Bug#349318: fixed in xft 2.1.8.2-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 349318 Bug#349318: libxft-dev: please do not export unnecessary libraries in xft.pc Bug is already open, cannot reopen. > block 349318 by 340904 Bug#349318: libxft-dev: please do not export unnecessary libraries in xft.pc Was not blocked by any

Bug#349318: fixed in xft 2.1.8.2-1

reopen 349318 block 349318 by 340904 thanks >* Add 001_no_export_freetype.diff. This is a modified patch from Steve > Langasek that causes xft.pc not to export freetype or xrender as part of > the interface, but hide them in Requires.private instead (closes: > #349318) The patch is

Processed: Reopening

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 349318 Bug#349318: libxft-dev: please do not export unnecessary libraries in xft.pc Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (ad

Bug#349318: marked as done (libxft-dev: please do not export unnecessary libraries in xft.pc)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:47:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#349318: fixed in xft 2.1.8.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#126519: what your employer is hiding from you

Hows it been going?, You have been selected to generate 1.5 - 3.5k daily! Phone me at my line below. Let me help you generate payments! Thanks, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1*888*700*4915 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1110 - branches/modular/lib/libXft-X11R7.0-2.1.8.2/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-01-22 22:09:34 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jan 2006) New Revision: 1110 Modified: branches/modular/lib/libXft-X11R7.0-2.1.8.2/debian/changelog branches/modular/lib/libXft-X11R7.0-2.1.8.2/debian/control Log: * Add build-dep on quilt * Set maintainer and uploaders Modified: br

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1109 - branches/modular/lib/libXft-X11R7.0-2.1.8.2/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-01-22 22:07:34 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jan 2006) New Revision: 1109 Modified: branches/modular/lib/libXft-X11R7.0-2.1.8.2/debian/changelog branches/modular/lib/libXft-X11R7.0-2.1.8.2/debian/control branches/modular/lib/libXft-X11R7.0-2.1.8.2/debian/libxft-dev.install

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1108 - in branches/modular/proto: bigreqsproto-X11R7.0-1.0.2/debian compositeproto-X11R7.0-0.2.2/debian damageproto-X11R7.0-1.0.3/debian dmxproto-X11R7.0-2.2.2/de

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-01-22 21:45:38 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jan 2006) New Revision: 1108 Modified: branches/modular/proto/bigreqsproto-X11R7.0-1.0.2/debian/changelog branches/modular/proto/compositeproto-X11R7.0-0.2.2/debian/changelog branches/modular/proto/damageproto-X11R7.0-1.0.3/debian/

Bug#45291: loan debra miller

For : debra miller We spoke a few days ago and I'd like to confirm everything now. Please check the information below and well me if you have any questions. erneck.com/v We're accepting your app. Your status has been accepted. We need to check your details 1 more time. Just visit the link a

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1107 - branches/modular/debian/xorg-common/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-01-22 21:25:17 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jan 2006) New Revision: 1107 Modified: branches/modular/debian/xorg-common/debian/changelog Log: Set to upload to experimental Modified: branches/modular/debian/xorg-common/debian/changelog ==

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1106 - in branches/modular/debian: x11-common/debian xorg-common/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-01-22 20:53:09 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jan 2006) New Revision: 1106 Modified: branches/modular/debian/x11-common/debian/control branches/modular/debian/xorg-common/debian/control Log: Set maintainer and uploaders for the -common packages properly Modified: branches/modula

Modular in Experimental

Hi all, I've decided to start uploading the modular pieces I'm happy with to experimental. I'll be doing the common packages tonight, and most likely the protocol headers too. I'll move on to the libs shortly after. Beware that the x11-common package does some magic to give us FHFS compliance. I

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1105 - branches/modular/debian/x11-common/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-01-22 20:31:33 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jan 2006) New Revision: 1105 Removed: branches/modular/debian/x11-common/debian/x11-common.README.Debian branches/modular/debian/x11-common/debian/x11-common.config.in branches/modular/debian/x11-common/debian/x11-common.dirs br

Bug#349318: libxft-dev: please do not export unnecessary libraries in xft.pc

On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 03:05:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > But libxft2 is already split out and installed in /usr/lib, so it should be > just a simple matter of packaging the new upstream version in order to fix > this particular one? Would an NMU be welcome here, or could some other > memb

Bug#345099: marked as done (xserver-xorg: doublescan mode not working)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:05:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#349318: libxft-dev: please do not export unnecessary libraries in xft.pc

On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 02:36:58PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 04:18:21AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:57:12AM +, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > This has already been fixed in the modular tree (/cvs/xorg/lib, as > > > opposed to /cvs/xlibs).

Bug#347680: Xorg breaks acpid

On Jan 23, Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > to be fixed in X (I suggest by retrying to open the socket if it worked > > the first time). > this is exactely what the patch I submitted here does. But it does only > once, so if the socket is not there on the first retry it'll steal > /pr

Bug#347680: Xorg breaks acpid

On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 11:24:15PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jan 12, Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No. That's the kernel only supporting a single reader for /proc/acpi/event. > > I'm cooking a patch to support multiple readers (based on an old and never > > applied patch) b

Bug#347680: Xorg breaks acpid

On Jan 12, Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No. That's the kernel only supporting a single reader for /proc/acpi/event. > I'm cooking a patch to support multiple readers (based on an old and never > applied patch) but I doubt it will be accepted mainline. > /proc/acpi/event contention h

Bug#349318: libxft-dev: please do not export unnecessary libraries in xft.pc

On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 04:18:21AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:57:12AM +, Daniel Stone wrote: > > tags 349318 + fixed-upstream > > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 02:44:28AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > So, I suppose most of you have read > > >

Processed: bug 348011 is forwarded to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5537

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 348011 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5537 Bug#348011: xorg-x11: Hurd /tmp/X11-unix/.X fixup Forwarded-to-address changed from can find the patch: to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5537. > End of message, stopping

Processed: bug 349203 is forwarded to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5537

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 349203 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5537 Bug#349203: xserver-xorg: Keyboard scancode translation for Hurd Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5537. > End of message

Processed: tagging 348011

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 348011 + upstream Bug#348011: xorg-x11: Hurd /tmp/X11-unix/.X fixup Tags were: pending patch Tags added: upstream > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adm

Processed: bug 348011 is forwarded to can find the patch:

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 348011 can find the patch: Bug#348011: xorg-x11: Hurd /tmp/X11-unix/.X fixup Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to can find the patch:. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debi

Processed: tagging 349203

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 349203 + upstream Bug#349203: xserver-xorg: Keyboard scancode translation for Hurd Tags were: patch Tags added: upstream > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrat

Bug#349412: xserver-xorg: vt switching problem: second display/screen is not restored correctly

Package: xserver-xorg Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 Severity: normal Graphics chip: nVidia 6800 Graphics memory: 128 MB Driver: nv I use an X server with 1600x1200 pixels on vt7, 85 Hz as first display. Then I have started another X server on vt8 with: startx -display :1 -- :1 -depth 16 -nolisten tcp

Mesa Transition

Hi all, This morning I realized that there's a transition I'd forgotten about that we'll need to put the archive through for 7.0. As the subject says, that's the mesa transition. Since all of our xlibs*mesa packages and such are going away in favor of those built from the mesa source package, we

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1104 - branches/modular/lib/mesa-6.4.1/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-01-22 14:50:19 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jan 2006) New Revision: 1104 Modified: branches/modular/lib/mesa-6.4.1/debian/changelog branches/modular/lib/mesa-6.4.1/debian/control branches/modular/lib/mesa-6.4.1/debian/mesa-swx11-source.install Log: * mesa-swrast-src.install

Bug#198386: Check it out

Just wanted to say thanks for everything. If you need anything please don't hesistate to ask. Hodge -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#166515: Thank you

Just wanted to say thanks for everything. If you need anything please don't hesistate to ask. Clifton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re:

  Nicholson Alisha

Re:

  Whittaker Cassie

Bug#349348: xserver-xorg: gamma should be set by configure

Package: xserver-xorg Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 Severity: wishlist I think the configure process should set a sensible gamma value. If not set, gamma defaults to 1.0, and this does not make sense. I recommend 1.8 (the Macintosh default), MS Windows uses 2.2. Setting a proper gamma value helps to

Bug#349318: libxft-dev: please do not export unnecessary libraries in xft.pc

On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:57:12AM +, Daniel Stone wrote: > tags 349318 + fixed-upstream > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 02:44:28AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > So, I suppose most of you have read > > about > > problems with p

Processed: Re: Bug#349318: libxft-dev: please do not export unnecessary libraries in xft.pc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 349318 + fixed-upstream Bug#349318: libxft-dev: please do not export unnecessary libraries in xft.pc Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 02:44:28AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Unknown command or malformed argu

Bug#349318: libxft-dev: please do not export unnecessary libraries in xft.pc

tags 349318 + fixed-upstream On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 02:44:28AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > So, I suppose most of you have read > about > problems with packages depending on libraries that they don't use, > particularly as re

Bug#349318: libxft-dev: please do not export unnecessary libraries in xft.pc

Package: libxft-dev Version: 2.1.7-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream Hi folks, So, I suppose most of you have read about problems with packages depending on libraries that they don't use, particularly as relates to a potenti

Bug#116507: refinance timothy gravelle

To : timothy gravelle We spoke yesterday and I'd like to go over everything now. Please check the info below and well me if you have any questions. b1ked33d96.com/v We're accepting your app. Your status has been accepted. We need to confirm your information one more time. Just visit the lin