On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:34:10PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> Hello Release Team,
>X.Org is planning on making a release of 6.9 and 7.0 in about a week.
> I've been preparing packages for 6.9, the monolithic release, based off the
> current Xorg packages. They've been sitting in experimental
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-12-16 00:49:10 -0500 (Fri, 16 Dec 2005)
New Revision: 950
Modified:
branches/modular/xserver/xorg/debian/rules
Log:
Disable lbx in xserver configuration
Modified: branches/modular/xserver/xorg/debian/rules
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:34:10PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> 3) xlibs-dev goes away. I already wrote about this to -devel-announce,
> and many packages have updated their build dependencies, including most
> recently gtk. This will almost definitely be the most drastic of the
> changes
Hello Release Team,
X.Org is planning on making a release of 6.9 and 7.0 in about a week.
I've been preparing packages for 6.9, the monolithic release, based off the
current Xorg packages. They've been sitting in experimental and they've
been fairly well tested judging by the bug reports we've g
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-12-15 23:04:38 -0500 (Thu, 15 Dec 2005)
New Revision: 949
Added:
branches/modular/lib/mesa-6.4.1/
Removed:
branches/modular/lib/mesa-6.4.0/
Log:
Rename mesa lib dir to appropriate version
Copied: branches/modular/lib/mesa-6.4.1 (from rev 948,
branches/modular/l
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-12-15 23:03:27 -0500 (Thu, 15 Dec 2005)
New Revision: 948
Modified:
branches/modular/lib/mesa-6.4.0/debian/changelog
Log:
Changelog version bump
Modified: branches/modular/lib/mesa-6.4.0/debian/changelog
==
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 04:35:58AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Users change keybindings.
> >
> > Daniel, running with an entirely custom keymap
>
> Sure!!
>
> So you keep the standard keybinding in /usr and your one liners
> keybinding modifications in /etc. This wa
Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 04:03:19AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 08:28:41PM +0100, J??r??me Warnier wrote:
> > > > I wonder if those files should really be conffiles at all, as it is
> > > > asking for a lot of confirmati
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 04:03:19AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 08:28:41PM +0100, J??r??me Warnier wrote:
> > > I wonder if those files should really be conffiles at all, as it is
> > > asking for a lot of confirmations to override with new maint
Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 08:28:41PM +0100, J??r??me Warnier wrote:
> > I wonder if those files should really be conffiles at all, as it is
> > asking for a lot of confirmations to override with new maintainer's
> > version from anyone trying to upgrade from one version to anoth
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 08:28:41PM +0100, J??r??me Warnier wrote:
> I wonder if those files should really be conffiles at all, as it is
> asking for a lot of confirmations to override with new maintainer's
> version from anyone trying to upgrade from one version to another (for
> example Sarge to E
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:53:07AM +0100, David Mart?nez Moreno wrote:
> El jueves, 15 de diciembre de 2005 03:48, Debian Bug Tracking System escribi?:
> [...]
> > From: Eugene Konev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [...]
> >
> > apt-get install libxau-dev
>
> Sorry, Eugene. I
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 03:41:23PM +0100, Sjoerd Hemminga wrote:
> The problem is that 028_loader_speed_hack.diff optimizes too much :)
>
> In xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/loadmod.c, function
> LoaderListDirs(), your patch removed all work on fp before
> fp = LoaderGetCanonicalName(buf, N
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:18:26PM -0800, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Also to Sven, please realize there's a reason Debian has (or hasn't) or a
> non-free section. If we really didn't care about anyone using non-free
> software, non-free wouldn't exist in the first place. Maybe 30% of installs
> m
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:53:54AM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > Ross, I've not worked on RC3 mainly because there didn't seem to be a need
> > for it. I'll try and get RC3 in to the svn repo and uploaded to
> > experimental ASAP so you can test whether or not it fixes your issue.
>
> > - David N
> Ross, I've not worked on RC3 mainly because there didn't seem to be a need
> for it. I'll try and get RC3 in to the svn repo and uploaded to
> experimental ASAP so you can test whether or not it fixes your issue.
> - David Nusinow
Thanks. Will it be safe to install the debs from experimental,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 343389 +pending
Bug#343389: x11-common: missing /etc/X11/rgb.txt file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
tags 343389 +pending
thanks
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:31:20PM -0500, Ben Bogart wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Indeed that command does not create an rgb.txt in /usr/X11/ I've temporarily
> solved this issue by copying the rgb.txt from the Xorg sources.
Ok, I think I've just found and hopefully solve
Accepted:
lbxproxy_6.8.99.903.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.99.903.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.99.903.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.99.903.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
libdmx1-dbg_6.8.99.903.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6
xorg-x11_6.8.99.903.dfsg.1-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xorg-x11_6.8.99.903.dfsg.1-1.dsc
xorg-x11_6.8.99.903.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz
xorg-x11_6.8.99.903.dfsg.1-1.diff.gz
pm-dev_6.8.99.903.dfsg.1-1_all.deb
x-dev_6.8.99.903.dfsg.1-1_all.deb
xfonts-100
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-12-15 14:52:49 -0500 (Thu, 15 Dec 2005)
New Revision: 947
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/x11-common.postinst.in
trunk/debian/x11-common.preinst.in
Log:
* Remove non-modified /etc/X11/rgb.txt on x11-common's preinst, not
postinst. The recommenda
Hi David,
Indeed that command does not create an rgb.txt in /usr/X11/ I've temporarily
solved this issue by copying the rgb.txt from the Xorg sources.
Thanks,
B. Bogart
- Original Message -
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 3:53 pm
Subject: Re:
I wonder if those files should really be conffiles at all, as it is
asking for a lot of confirmations to override with new maintainer's
version from anyone trying to upgrade from one version to another (for
example Sarge to Etch), while those files have never been modified by
the user.
If they are
> "Ben" == Ben Wing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> the best way to know for sure is for you to compille XEmacs
Ben> yourself, with debugging support.
Also, Debian supplies -dbg packages for the X libraries, so you would
be able to get useful traces. You just use LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:40:29AM +0100, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El Miércoles, 14 de Diciembre de 2005 18:55, Dan Jacobson escribió:
> > Package: xfree86
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > I notice /var/log/XFree86.0.log* are not removed upon purge.
> > (Maybe xserver-xorg has this problem too?
El Miércoles, 14 de Diciembre de 2005 18:55, Dan Jacobson escribió:
> Package: xfree86
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I notice /var/log/XFree86.0.log* are not removed upon purge.
> (Maybe xserver-xorg has this problem too?)
As far as I can tell /var/log/whatever are not intended to be removed
i
El jueves, 15 de diciembre de 2005 03:48, Debian Bug Tracking System escribió:
[...]
> From: Eugene Konev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
>
> apt-get install libxau-dev
Sorry, Eugene. I did not notice your mail, and I just sent another
closing
message. O:-)
Bes
El miércoles, 14 de diciembre de 2005 22:37, David Nusinow escribió:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:18:12PM -0800, Debian Installer wrote:
> > Rejected: no source found for xorg-x11 6.8.99.903.dfsg.1-1
> > (libxxf86dga-dev_6.8.99.903.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb).
>
> Does anyone have any idea why dpkg-buildpac
29 matches
Mail list logo
