On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 12:03 +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> Hi,
> > Did you upgrade from -5 to -6? There shouldn't have been anything that
> > touched this sort of thing between those two revisions.
>
> I'm pretty sure I had -5 running before that. I tried downgrading the
> xserver-xorg package, bu
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 00:26 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> xserver-xfree86 allowed one to exit the xserver to a virtual console
> using the alt-ctl-f1...f6 combinations. The new xserver-xorg does not
> appear to allow this; this is very important should a window manager
> get stuck, for example.
>
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6
Severity: important
xserver-xfree86 allowed one to exit the xserver to a virtual console
using the alt-ctl-f1...f6 combinations. The new xserver-xorg does not
appear to allow this; this is very important should a window manager
get stuck, for example.
Package: x11-common
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6
Severity: normal
File: /etc/Xsession
File: /etc/Xsession.options
I was prompted with the following 2 diffs today while dist-upgrading
to current testing; I made none of the listed changes.
--- /etc/X11/Xsession.options 2002-04-16 08:29:11.0 -
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 06:13:49PM +0200, David Mart?nez Moreno wrote:
> El miércoles, 7 de septiembre de 2005 19:27, Michel Dänzer escribió:
> > > Such behavior would be acceptable if X.org forgot old background
> > > images. But it doesn't. Try to successively load a series of
> > > background im
After reloading X, it uses ~28mb of memory. When it uses ~250mb -
system is becoming too slow. So, what do you say? What should I do to
test it?
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6
Severity: normal
Every time I upgrade xserver (this also happened in xfre886 times)
X applications' startup slows tremendously (I'm using KDE if it has any
meaning). This effect disappears after I run "fc-cache -f" manually.
I'm not familiar enough wit
El miércoles, 7 de septiembre de 2005 19:27, Michel Dänzer escribió:
> > Such behavior would be acceptable if X.org forgot old background
> > images. But it doesn't. Try to successively load a series of
> > background images, e.g. from the KDE wallpaper collection, and the
> > memory occupied by Xo
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 10:39 +0200, Jan Nielsen wrote:
> >
> >>(II) RADEON(0): Primary:
> >> Monitor -- CRT
> >> Connector -- VGA
> >> DAC Type -- Primary
> >> TMDS Type -- NONE
> >> DDC Type -- VGA_DDC
> >>(II) RADEON(0): Secondary:
> >> Monitor -- NONE
> >> Connector -- DVI-I
> >> D
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:54:25PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> Hi,
> Just a minute ago, Xorg locked up for no reason with the very same
> behaviour...
> I could ssh to the box; Xorg was at 100%, killing Xorg and restarting it
> (well, gdm did so) got me a working new Xserver.
> So maybe it's jus
Hi,
Just a minute ago, Xorg locked up for no reason with the very same
behaviour...
I could ssh to the box; Xorg was at 100%, killing Xorg and restarting it
(well, gdm did so) got me a working new Xserver.
So maybe it's just triggering a different bug on suspend...
btw, your provider, verizon, doe
It used to work with the initial configuration, but something happened
in the latest upgrade that broke it. I fixed it but maybe IPV6 should
not be enabled by default, it is not compiled in thy kernel :) (if it's
the problem)
Today I tried to connect remotely to Wolfe and Colborne xdm server
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 08:01:59AM -0700, Archive Administrator wrote:
>> xorg-x11_6.9.0.dfsg.1-0pre1+SVN_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
>> localhost
>
> Grr... my first upload got processed before I had time to upload the
> .orig.tar.gz. I re-up
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:43:31PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 08 September 2005 10:22, Sven Luther wrote:
> > It is well possible that a similar detection problem is present in the
> > XFree86 package, and the fact that it works fine in ubuntu is probably
> > due to them using X.org, whe
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2005 23:22:48 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327179: replace i830 with i915 in xorg.conf upon upgrading.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:43:31PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 08 September 2005 10:22, Sven Luther wrote:
> > It is well possible that a similar detection problem is present in the
> > XFree86 package, and the fact that it works fine in ubuntu is probably
> > due to them using X.org, whe
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:14:33PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 08 September 2005 12:22, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > debian-installer does not use any version of discover in any way, shape
> > or form. Perhaps you were thinking of hotplug?
>
> Hmm. D-I most certainly _does_ use discover1 and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 09:28:50PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 13:36 +0300, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> > [replace i810 with i915]
>
> There is no 'i915' driver. The driver is still called i810, even though
> it supports all i8xx
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 13:36 +0300, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> [replace i810 with i915]
There is no 'i915' driver. The driver is still called i810, even though
it supports all i8xx and i9xx chipsets.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 13:14 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 08 September 2005 12:22, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > debian-installer does not use any version of discover in any way, shape
> > or form. Perhaps you were thinking of hotplug?
>
> Hmm. D-I most certainly _does_ use discover1 and not ho
On Thursday 08 September 2005 12:22, Daniel Stone wrote:
> debian-installer does not use any version of discover in any way, shape
> or form. Perhaps you were thinking of hotplug?
Hmm. D-I most certainly _does_ use discover1 and not hotplug.
AFAIK, the Ubuntu installer does not use discover durin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 08:13:54PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 10:55 +0300, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> > [please replace i830 with i915 in xorg.conf]
>
> Where? Why? It's not even listed in xorg.conf anywhere. The DDX
> driver
On Thursday 08 September 2005 10:22, Sven Luther wrote:
> It is well possible that a similar detection problem is present in the
> XFree86 package, and the fact that it works fine in ubuntu is probably
> due to them using X.org, where this bug is absent.
Another possible reason for differences is
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 10:22 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:52:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson / Debian Project
> Leader wrote:
> > The Debian Sarge release uses a program called "discover1" to discern what
> > hardware is on the system, so I would encourage you to file a bug r
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 10:55 +0300, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> [please replace i830 with i915 in xorg.conf]
Where? Why? It's not even listed in xorg.conf anywhere. The DDX
driver is i810.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
Hi,
> Did you upgrade from -5 to -6? There shouldn't have been anything that
> touched this sort of thing between those two revisions.
I'm pretty sure I had -5 running before that. I tried downgrading the
xserver-xorg package, but that didn't help. Any of the lib packages I
could try?
I have the i
Hi,
Just to report that I also suffer from this bug on my Hitachi Prius laptop
under xfree86 (but not under xorg; however I cannot get the 1200x800 mode
working under xorg - I need to use 855resolution to get it working under
xfree86, but I digress).
The patch posted above (to /etc/X11/xkb/symb
Author: ender
Date: 2005-09-08 04:28:22 -0500 (Thu, 08 Sep 2005)
New Revision: 595
Modified:
trunk/debian/control
Log:
A typo remained from the thinko << by >=.
Modified: trunk/debian/control
===
--- trunk/debian/control2
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:51:41PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 11:25:55AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 08:01:59AM -0700, Archive Administrator wrote:
> > > xorg-x11_6.9.0.dfsg.1-0pre1+SVN_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
> > > localhost
> >
Michel Dänzer wrote:
merge 327098 327099
thanks
Sorry about that
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 18:08 +0200, Jan Nielsen wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6
Upgrading from XFree86 to Xorg broke my dual head xinerama setup. This same
setup worked perfectly well with XFree86 4.3
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:52:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson / Debian Project
Leader wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:39:16AM -0500, kristian david wrote:
> > Hi =o)
> >
> > I'm administratively a "NONAME" guy (homeless because of a
> > "Microcephaleous Gates" that is a kind of New-Digital-Nazi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6
Severity: wishlist
I guess this'd be nice, Maybe when etch is released and people do a
dist-upgrade.
Not sure.
Best wishes,
- --
-
- -- Katoob Main Developer, Arabbix Maintainer.
GNU/
Package: nvidia-glx
Version: 1.0.7676-1
Followup-For: Bug #318660
nvidia-glx (non-free) has a strage header:
$ dpkg -I /var/cache/apt/archives/nvidia-glx_1.0.7676-1_i386.deb
Conflicts: nvidia-glx-src
Replaces: nvidia-glx-src
Provides: xserver
nvidia-glx does NOT pr
33 matches
Mail list logo
