Pharmaceutical services for the modern men

2005-06-11 Thread Cecilia
Leading in affordable healthcare... we care for you! http://jftx.528gr6ng2xnvro5.dactylistil.com The pleasure of love is in loving. Men are slower to recognize blessings than misfortunes. The position of the artist is humble. He is essentially a channel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Perl ? Rolex, Cartier and Breitling

2005-06-11 Thread Christie
Get the Finest Rolex Watch Replica ! We only sell premium watches. There's no battery in these replicas just like the real ones since they charge themselves as you move. The second hand moves JUST like the real ones, too. These original watches sell in stores for thousands of dollars. We sell

Re: Backported patch annotations for nv, etc.

2005-06-11 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 02:14:29PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Ahem. You don't read my messages, I guess. We know exactly which upstream > commits to the NV drivers were backported, although I haven't checked the > ChangeLog for all of them. Two clearly belong in, one clearly doesn't. >

Re: Patch audit TODO update

2005-06-11 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 01:58:17PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Daniel Stone wrote: > >xfree86 got updates after we forked that I never merged back. > :-) > > Do you happen to know the revision range I should be looking in? i.e What's > the fork point, or the last point in the xfree86 patche

Re: Patch audit continued, mostly locales

2005-06-11 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 01:54:55PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Daniel Stone wrote: > > Already been submitted, and it's blocking on someone from Sun who, > > AFAICT, hasn't meaningfully existed in any X.Org sense for years now. > Eeeew. What is this Sun guy complaining about? Can't the curre

Lost xfree86 packaging changes -- more than there should be

2005-06-11 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Daniel Stone wrote: >Again, you seem to be excluding the possibility of further development >happening in xfree86 that didn't happen to get synced. Hate to tell you this, but I was right first time. Somebody did lose part of the locales patch. * The grammar changes were present in xfree86 Debia

Patch: TODO update [replaces #3-6]

2005-06-11 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Pure update to the TODO for the patch audit. Subsequent submissions will fix some of these and other problems. Consider my previous submissions #3-6 to be obsolete. Could someone commit for me? Index: TODO === --- TODO(revi

Backported patch annotations for nv, etc.

2005-06-11 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Branden Robinson wrote: > Consolidate most patches that were in 000_stolen_from_HEAD into > _backport_from_upstream. Can we find a *good* name for this patch? We want: (a) a name for the patch for pieces ported from the upstream *release branch* (currently empty, but will no doubt reappear som

Re: Patch audit TODO update

2005-06-11 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Daniel Stone wrote: > > + * Portions appear to be formatting changes and rearrangements > > + which probably should be dropped if they're not accepted upstream > > Does it really matter? It just makes the patch harder to read and causes unnecessary interference with subsequent patches (

Re: Patch audit TODO update

2005-06-11 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Daniel Stone wrote: >xfree86 got updates after we forked that I never merged back. :-) Do you happen to know the revision range I should be looking in? i.e What's the fork point, or the last point in the xfree86 patches at which everything was merged to Ubuntu? Knowing this would make the port

Re: Patch audit continued, mostly locales

2005-06-11 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Daniel Stone wrote: >Again, you seem to be excluding the possibility of further development >happening in xfree86 that didn't happen to get synced. Yes. (1) I didn't look at xfree86 upstream (2) I didn't check the history of Debian's xfree86 patches back very far. (3) I made the assumption that th

Re: Lost xfree86 packaging changes -- more than there should be

2005-06-11 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 02:44:32PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Daniel Stone wrote: > >Again, you seem to be excluding the possibility of further development > >happening in xfree86 that didn't happen to get synced. > > Hate to tell you this, but I was right first time. Somebody did lose part

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r193 - trunk/debian

2005-06-11 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2005-06-11 11:50:05 -0500 (Sat, 11 Jun 2005) New Revision: 193 Modified: trunk/debian/TODO Log: Claim TODO items. Modified: trunk/debian/TODO === --- trunk/debian/TODO 2005-06-11 16:48:44 UTC (rev 192) +++

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r192 - trunk/debian/local

2005-06-11 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2005-06-11 11:48:44 -0500 (Sat, 11 Jun 2005) New Revision: 192 Modified: trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml Log: Set the FAQ's svn:mime-type property to "application/xhtml+xml" so it displays properly when browsed directly out of the SVN repository. Property changes on: trunk

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r190 - trunk/debian/local

2005-06-11 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2005-06-11 03:49:53 -0500 (Sat, 11 Jun 2005) New Revision: 190 Removed: trunk/debian/local/README.uc Log: Remove bizarre straggler file that is a duplicate of an upstream file (xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/rendition/README.uc). Deleted: trunk/debian/local/READM