On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:23:27PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:01:51PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Probably the best thing for you to do is install and switch to the
> > debugging X server so that a reasonable core dump can be obtained and
> > used for a backtrace.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:18:22PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> I put a new #063 patch (063_fix_weak_deps.diff) on the URL bellow:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~ishikawa/XFree86/063_fix_weak_deps.diff
>
> update:
>
> * add define SharedXvReqs in xc/config/cf/lnxLib.tmpl
> * add MathLibra
Branden,
Sorry for the long delay, I've been on vacation. Here's the output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dih$ ./culprits.sh
Analyzing /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb:
drwxr-xr-x 13 root root 4096 Aug 3 21:18 /usr
drwxr-xr-x6 root root 4096 Aug 13 01:13 /usr/X11R6
drwxr-xr-x4
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Add more weak library dependencies I've found.
>> 0pre1v3
>> ---
>> -(nothing yet)
>> +* libOSMesa.so.4.0
>> +libGL.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 (0x6fdbd000)
>> +libc.so.6 => /
Branden,
Sorry for the long delay, I've been on vacation. Here's the output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dih$ ./culprits.sh
Analyzing /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb:
drwxr-xr-x 13 root root 4096 Aug 3 21:18 /usr
drwxr-xr-x6 root root 4096 Aug 13 01:13 /usr/X11R6
drwxr-xr-x4
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Add more weak library dependencies I've found.
>> 0pre1v3
>> ---
>> -(nothing yet)
>> +* libOSMesa.so.4.0
>> +libGL.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 (0x6fdbd000)
>> +libc.so.6 => /
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:01:51PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Probably the best thing for you to do is install and switch to the
> debugging X server so that a reasonable core dump can be obtained and
> used for a backtrace.
I will try 0pre1v2 first, then install the debugging server for tha
Hi Matthieu,
I've further improved the pam_setcred() patch to use PAM's own error
reporting function (and made the C style consistent to boot).
I did also remove that %\"s format string and replace it with ordinary
%s. The \" qualifier is not documented in any manpage or the GNU info
documentati
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:01:51PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Probably the best thing for you to do is install and switch to the
> debugging X server so that a reasonable core dump can be obtained and
> used for a backtrace.
I will try 0pre1v2 first, then install the debugging server for tha
Hi Matthieu,
I've further improved the pam_setcred() patch to use PAM's own error
reporting function (and made the C style consistent to boot).
I did also remove that %\"s format string and replace it with ordinary
%s. The \" qualifier is not documented in any manpage or the GNU info
documentati
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-25 14:33:28 -0500 (Thu, 25 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 587
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
Log:
Note another patch's now-known disposition.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
===
--- branc
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-25 14:33:28 -0500 (Thu, 25 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 587
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
Log:
Note another patch's now-known disposition.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
===
--- branc
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-25 14:31:35 -0500 (Thu, 25 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 586
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/017_fix_Xlib_depend_target.diff
Log:
Add explanation of patch's motivation and function.
- debian/patches/017_fix_Xlib_depend_target.diff
Modified: branches/4.3.0/
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-25 14:31:03 -0500 (Thu, 25 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 585
Modified:
trunk/debian/patches/041_fix_Xlib_depend_target.diff
Log:
Add explanation of patch's motivation and function.
- debian/patches/041_fix_Xlib_depend_target.diff
Modified: trunk/debian/patches/041_fix
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:10:59AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > Uh, no, there isn't.
>
> Oh, I guess you are right...my bad...but it does build fine without 017. I
> thought that depend:: meant it was adding to the existing rule. I confused
> the other depend:: rule
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 212347 xlibs: [nls] 'normal' composition sequences missing in
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/en_US.UTF-8/Compose
Bug#212347: en_US.UTF-8 compositions missing in
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/en_US.UTF-8/Compose
Changed Bug title.
> tag 212347 + upst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 212322 + moreinfo unreproducible woody
Bug#212322: xserver-xfree86: After security patch (woody1) xfree86 is not
installable for MGA-G550
Tags were: woody
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible, woody
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-25 14:31:35 -0500 (Thu, 25 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 586
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/017_fix_Xlib_depend_target.diff
Log:
Add explanation of patch's motivation and function.
- debian/patches/017_fix_Xlib_depend_target.diff
Modified: branches/4.3.0/
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-25 14:31:03 -0500 (Thu, 25 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 585
Modified:
trunk/debian/patches/041_fix_Xlib_depend_target.diff
Log:
Add explanation of patch's motivation and function.
- debian/patches/041_fix_Xlib_depend_target.diff
Modified: trunk/debian/patches/041_fix
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:10:59AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > Uh, no, there isn't.
>
> Oh, I guess you are right...my bad...but it does build fine without 017. I
> thought that depend:: meant it was adding to the existing rule. I confused
> the other depend:: rule
You have a secret admirer
Find out who below
http://www.geocities.com/christian98181/webcam.html
If you want further information from me directly,
we can have a private meeting
http://www.geocities.com/xinghao54989/
7dporosityupwthwinagiddwxmlrlle
k ffleepdj
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 212347 xlibs: [nls] 'normal' composition sequences missing in
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/en_US.UTF-8/Compose
Bug#212347: en_US.UTF-8 compositions missing in
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/en_US.UTF-8/Compose
Changed Bug title.
> tag 212347 + upst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 212322 + moreinfo unreproducible woody
Bug#212322: xserver-xfree86: After security patch (woody1) xfree86 is not installable
for MGA-G550
Tags were: woody
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible, woody
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:55:47PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:08:23AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
>> Built successfully sans #017.
>
> Sigh, ignore this message, as I'm way too tired. #017 was included, and I
> really need to go to bed now.
I t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 212322 + woody
Bug#212322: xserver-xfree86: After security patch (woody1) xfree86 is not
installable for MGA-G550
There were no tags set.
Tags added: woody
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
You have a secret admirer
Find out who below
http://www.geocities.com/christian98181/webcam.html
If you want further information from me directly,
we can have a private meeting
http://www.geocities.com/xinghao54989/
7dporosityupwthwinagiddwxmlrlle
k ffleepdj
Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:55:47PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:08:23AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
>> Built successfully sans #017.
>
> Sigh, ignore this message, as I'm way too tired. #017 was included, and I
> really need to go to bed now.
I t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 212322 + woody
Bug#212322: xserver-xfree86: After security patch (woody1) xfree86 is not installable
for MGA-G550
There were no tags set.
Tags added: woody
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Branden Robinson wrote:
> Uh, no, there isn't.
Oh, I guess you are right...my bad...but it does build fine without 017. I
thought that depend:: meant it was adding to the existing rule. I confused
the other depend:: rules. I thought they would take the place of
the empty depend::.
wt
--
Warren
lbxproxy_4.3.0-0pre1v2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0-0pre1v2_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0-0pre1v2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0-0pre1v2_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-0pre1v2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-0pre1v2_powerpc.deb
libd
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 212186 - sid
Bug#212186: FTB modules package with latest dpkg-dev version
Tags were: sid
Tags removed: sid
> tag 212186 + experimental
Bug#212186: FTB modules package with latest dpkg-dev version
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson wrote:
> Uh, no, there isn't.
Oh, I guess you are right...my bad...but it does build fine without 017. I
thought that depend:: meant it was adding to the existing rule. I confused
the other depend:: rules. I thought they would take the place of
the empty depend::.
wt
--
Warren
lbxproxy_4.3.0-0pre1v2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0-0pre1v2_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0-0pre1v2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0-0pre1v2_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-0pre1v2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-0pre1v2_powerpc.deb
libd
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 212186 - sid
Bug#212186: FTB modules package with latest dpkg-dev version
Tags were: sid
Tags removed: sid
> tag 212186 + experimental
Bug#212186: FTB modules package with latest dpkg-dev version
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental
>
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-25 00:57:32 -0500 (Thu, 25 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 584
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/002_xdm_fixes.diff
Log:
Update pam_setcred() security fix to xdm to use pam_error and
pam_strerror().
Also make some cosmetic
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-25 00:53:54 -0500 (Thu, 25 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 583
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff
trunk/debian/patches/002_xdm_fixes.diff
Log:
SECURITY: Fix for CAN-2003-0690; xdm did not verify the return value of
the pam
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:29:46PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Is anyone opposed to removing patch 017? It is not needed in XF 4.3 as there
> is already a depend:: target in the Imakefile in xc/lib/X11. This will
> bring that Imakefile in sync with upstream, I believe.
Uh, no, there isn't.
% ca
53 matches
Mail list logo