On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:53:46PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> This looks like an enlightenment rather than an Xnest bug to me?
Not if Xnest itself went ahead and aborted, as he said it did.
If Xnest didn't actually stop running, then you're right, this isn't an
X bug.
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:32:03PM +0200, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
>
> > severity 208683 important
>
> Oh, sooorry... forgot to classify it myself.
>
> > What architecture are you using?
>
> i386 (Pentium IV).
>
> > We should probably get an unstripped
> > Xnest binary into your hands, so tha
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 12:18:30PM -0700, Paul Telford wrote:
> If you are referring to people.debian.org/~branden/packages/ then the ia64
> dir seems to be empty, so it doesn't help with the above problem much. Is
> this repository still maintained, or can I get the experimental ia64
> package
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-04 18:53:26 -0500 (Thu, 04 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 481
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
Log:
debian/TODO: get this file up-to-date with my current plans
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
=
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 09:22:21 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#208735: libqt3-mt-dev dependent on libxcursor-dev, which
can't be installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 07:06:29PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >(WW) I810(0): xf86AllocateGARTMemory: allocation of 1024 pages failed
> >(Cannot allocate memory)
> >(II) I810(0): No physical memory available for 4194304 bytes of DCACHE
> >(WW) I810(0): xf86BindGARTMemory:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:53:46PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> This looks like an enlightenment rather than an Xnest bug to me?
Not if Xnest itself went ahead and aborted, as he said it did.
If Xnest didn't actually stop running, then you're right, this isn't an
X bug.
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:32:03PM +0200, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
>
> > severity 208683 important
>
> Oh, sooorry... forgot to classify it myself.
>
> > What architecture are you using?
>
> i386 (Pentium IV).
>
> > We should probably get an unstripped
> > Xnest binary into your hands, so tha
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 12:18:30PM -0700, Paul Telford wrote:
> If you are referring to people.debian.org/~branden/packages/ then the ia64
> dir seems to be empty, so it doesn't help with the above problem much. Is
> this repository still maintained, or can I get the experimental ia64
> package
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-04 18:53:26 -0500 (Thu, 04 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 481
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
Log:
debian/TODO: get this file up-to-date with my current plans
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
=
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 09:22:21 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#208735: libqt3-mt-dev dependent on libxcursor-dev, which can't be
installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 19:26, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:41:42PM +0200, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> > Package: xnest
> > Version: 4.2.1-6
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Xnest :2 &
> > [1] 19166 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Could not init font path element
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 07:06:29PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >(WW) I810(0): xf86AllocateGARTMemory: allocation of 1024 pages failed
> >(Cannot allocate memory)
> >(II) I810(0): No physical memory available for 4194304 bytes of DCACHE
> >(WW) I810(0): xf86BindGARTMemory:
Package: libxcursor-dev
Version: 1.0.2-2
Problem: Problem installing libxcursor-dev
Error Message:
Unpacking libxcursor-dev (from .../libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 19:26, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:41:42PM +0200, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> > Package: xnest
> > Version: 4.2.1-6
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Xnest :2 &
> > [1] 19166 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Could not init font path element
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/
> severity 208683 important
Oh, sooorry... forgot to classify it myself.
> What architecture are you using?
i386 (Pentium IV).
> We should probably get an unstripped
> Xnest binary into your hands, so that a core dump can be analyzed.
Can build one myself. Tomorrow. (Just checking mail from a
You wrote:
> The XFree86 4.2.1 X server's loadable module support in combination
> with GCC 3.3 on the IA-64 doesn't work.
>
> You'll need to use the unofficial 4.3.0 packages (see the URL in my
> .sig) or the xserver-xfree86-dbg package.
If you are referring to people.debian.org/~branden/packag
Package: libxcursor-dev
Version: 1.0.2-2
Problem: Problem installing libxcursor-dev
Error Message:
Unpacking libxcursor-dev (from .../libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R
severity 208683 important
retitle 208683 xnest: server crashes when using Enlightenment
tag 208683 + moreinfo upstream
thanks
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:41:42PM +0200, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> Package: xnest
> Version: 4.2.1-6
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Xnest :2 &
> [1] 19166 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 208683 important
Bug#208683: Xnest killed by enlightenment
Severity set to `important'.
> retitle 208683 xnest: server crashes when using Enlightenment
Bug#208683: Xnest killed by enlightenment
Changed Bug title.
> tag 208683 + moreinfo upstr
> severity 208683 important
Oh, sooorry... forgot to classify it myself.
> What architecture are you using?
i386 (Pentium IV).
> We should probably get an unstripped
> Xnest binary into your hands, so that a core dump can be analyzed.
Can build one myself. Tomorrow. (Just checking mail from a
You wrote:
> The XFree86 4.2.1 X server's loadable module support in combination
> with GCC 3.3 on the IA-64 doesn't work.
>
> You'll need to use the unofficial 4.3.0 packages (see the URL in my
> .sig) or the xserver-xfree86-dbg package.
If you are referring to people.debian.org/~branden/packag
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:13:49PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Should this bug be downgraded / reassigned back to licq, or does
> fixed-in-experimental mean it will soon be fixed-in-testing?
That depends on how quickly I and the other XSF committing folks can get
the 4.3.0-in-unstable TODO list
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 06:36, Miles Bader wrote:
>
> I have a computer that has integrated video using the i815 chipset (or
> at least, that what the kernel/X says). This works fine with xfree86
> at 1024x768 resolution, but 1280x1024 resolution yields a glitchy
> display -- basically everything l
severity 208683 important
retitle 208683 xnest: server crashes when using Enlightenment
tag 208683 + moreinfo upstream
thanks
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:41:42PM +0200, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> Package: xnest
> Version: 4.2.1-6
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Xnest :2 &
> [1] 19166 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 208683 important
Bug#208683: Xnest killed by enlightenment
Severity set to `important'.
> retitle 208683 xnest: server crashes when using Enlightenment
Bug#208683: Xnest killed by enlightenment
Changed Bug title.
> tag 208683 + moreinfo upstr
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:13:49PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Should this bug be downgraded / reassigned back to licq, or does
> fixed-in-experimental mean it will soon be fixed-in-testing?
That depends on how quickly I and the other XSF committing folks can get
the 4.3.0-in-unstable TODO list
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 06:36, Miles Bader wrote:
>
> I have a computer that has integrated video using the i815 chipset (or
> at least, that what the kernel/X says). This works fine with xfree86
> at 1024x768 resolution, but 1280x1024 resolution yields a glitchy
> display -- basically everything l
Package: xnest
Version: 4.2.1-6
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Xnest :2 &
[1] 19166 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Could not init font path element
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing from list!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ DISPLAY=:2.0 enlightenment
Xlib: extension "MIT-SHM" missing on display ":2.0".
(...)
Xlib: e
Package: xnest
Version: 4.2.1-6
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Xnest :2 &
[1] 19166 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Could not init font path element
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing from list!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ DISPLAY=:2.0 enlightenment
Xlib: extension "MIT-SHM" missing on display ":2.0".
(...)
Xlib: e
30 matches
Mail list logo