Do you qmFTGtq vlZxwwgWVLk ?
eEkvc ok
e}{cIude-Ya
No where
Do you qmFTGtq vlZxwwgWVLk ?
eEkvc ok
e}{cIude-Ya
No where
Package: XFree86
Version: 4.1.0.1 / X window system
protocol: Version 11 revision 0 vendor release 6510
--- Begin Message ---
Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the
pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a
pseudo-header at all.
This makes it much har
Package: XFree86
Version: 4.1.0.1 / X window system
protocol: Version 11 revision 0 vendor release 6510
--- Begin Message ---
Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the
pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a
pseudo-header at all.
This makes it much har
Package: xterm
Version: 4.2.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux selina 2.4.21selina1 #2 SMP Sat Jul 19 14:07:55 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8
Versions of packag
#include
* Eduard Bloch [Sat, Jul 19 2003, 09:23:23PM]:
> I tried to setup the DPI resolution of my display properly. But somehow,
> the Xserver does not use the values of DisplaySize setting. They are
> apparently parsed since the Xserver breaks on wrong (non-integer)
> parameters. However, xdpy
Hello,
I tried to setup the DPI resolution of my display properly. But somehow,
the Xserver does not use the values of DisplaySize setting. They are
apparently parsed since the Xserver breaks on wrong (non-integer)
parameters. However, xdpyinfo also shows
screen #0:
dimensions:1024x768 pixe
Package: xterm
Version: 4.2.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux selina 2.4.21selina1 #2 SMP Sat Jul 19 14:07:55 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8
Versions of packag
#include
* Eduard Bloch [Sat, Jul 19 2003, 09:23:23PM]:
> I tried to setup the DPI resolution of my display properly. But somehow,
> the Xserver does not use the values of DisplaySize setting. They are
> apparently parsed since the Xserver breaks on wrong (non-integer)
> parameters. However, xdpy
Hello,
I tried to setup the DPI resolution of my display properly. But somehow,
the Xserver does not use the values of DisplaySize setting. They are
apparently parsed since the Xserver breaks on wrong (non-integer)
parameters. However, xdpyinfo also shows
screen #0:
dimensions:1024x768 pixe
Package: xfs
Version: 4.2.1-9
Severity: wishlist
Guillem Jover and I worked out the following proposal at DebConf 3.
Should apply to xfs, xfstt, and xfs-xtt.
1) Petition debian-policy for dynamically allocated user id under which
to run X font servers. Username possibly "xfntserv"?
2) Modify x
Hi,
follow this link and find out how to play 88 lines on the National lottery for
just £5 a week..
www.virtualworlddirect.com/16792EW
Thanks for looking and
GOOD LUCK!!
Package: xfs
Version: 4.2.1-9
Severity: wishlist
Guillem Jover and I worked out the following proposal at DebConf 3.
Should apply to xfs, xfstt, and xfs-xtt.
1) Petition debian-policy for dynamically allocated user id under which
to run X font servers. Username possibly "xfntserv"?
2) Modify x
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:58:33PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > XFree86 4.3.0 does not use xftcache, xftcache is dropped
>> > from the tree. Both Xft1 (is rewrited to use it) and Xft2 use
>> > fontcon
Hi,
follow this link and find out how to play 88 lines on the National lottery for just £5
a week..
www.virtualworlddirect.com/16792EW
Thanks for looking and
GOOD LUCK!!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:58:33PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > XFree86 4.3.0 does not use xftcache, xftcache is dropped
>> > from the tree. Both Xft1 (is rewrited to use it) and Xft2 use
>> > fontcon
Subversion 0.25 is now in unstable, so I'm upgrading necrotic to use it.
0.25 features a nice new tool to prune redundant BDB log
files, which I suspect might be contributing to the recent recurring
memory starvation problems on necrotic.
Committers, please upgrade to 0.25.
--
G. Branden Robins
Subversion 0.25 is now in unstable, so I'm upgrading necrotic to use it.
0.25 features a nice new tool to prune redundant BDB log
files, which I suspect might be contributing to the recent recurring
memory starvation problems on necrotic.
Committers, please upgrade to 0.25.
--
G. Branden Robins
18 matches
Mail list logo
