On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 10:35:05PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-03 01:20:03 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 1. 'Load "i2c"' is missing after configuration through 'dpkg-reconfigure
> > > xserver-xfree86', but some symbol of libi2c.a is needed by the radeon
> >
[This message also going to the debian-x mailing list.]
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 12:43:16AM -0800, Ron wrote:
> Recent changes to the mesa package aren't reflected in xlibmesa yet.
That's correct. XFree86 keeps its own copy of Mesa and resyncs with
Mesa upstream on its own schedule.
> Packages w
Hi,
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > What is the proper way to shuffle patches around in the
>> > > debian/patches and debian/old-patches directories? I actually just copied the
>> > > patches dir from the 4.2.1 sources to the old-patches dir
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 10:35:05PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-03 01:20:03 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 1. 'Load "i2c"' is missing after configuration through 'dpkg-reconfigure
> > > xserver-xfree86', but some symbol of libi2c.a is needed by the radeon
> >
[This message also going to the debian-x mailing list.]
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 12:43:16AM -0800, Ron wrote:
> Recent changes to the mesa package aren't reflected in xlibmesa yet.
That's correct. XFree86 keeps its own copy of Mesa and resyncs with
Mesa upstream on its own schedule.
> Packages w
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 08:16:30AM -0800, b d scrawled:
> Hi, (I originally posted in debian-user but I think
> this is more applicable here sorry for the repost
> if you read the other)
>
> I have multiple alpha systems, and unfortunately as it
> turns out must compile Xfree86 from source
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 04:44:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 03:34:45AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > I didn't see any information about starting work on getting xfree 4.3
> > packaged
> > on the X Strike Force page. Therefore, I am taking a little initiative a
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 08:16:30AM -0800, b d scrawled:
> Hi, (I originally posted in debian-user but I think
> this is more applicable here sorry for the repost
> if you read the other)
>
> I have multiple alpha systems, and unfortunately as it
> turns out must compile Xfree86 from source
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 04:44:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 03:34:45AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > I didn't see any information about starting work on getting xfree 4.3 packaged
> > on the X Strike Force page. Therefore, I am taking a little initiative and
>
On Fri, 2003-01-03 01:20:03 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 11:05:05PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > However, X cannor start because of two reasons:
> >
> > 1. 'Load "i2c"' is missing after configuration through 'dpk
On Fri, 2003-01-03 01:20:03 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 11:05:05PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > However, X cannor start because of two reasons:
> >
> > 1. 'Load "i2c"' is missing after configuration through 'dpk
Hi, (I originally posted in debian-user but I think
this is more applicable here sorry for the repost
if you read the other)
I have multiple alpha systems, and unfortunately as it
turns out must compile Xfree86 from source, due to the
fact that the official alpha packages of debian do not
Hi, (I originally posted in debian-user but I think
this is more applicable here sorry for the repost
if you read the other)
I have multiple alpha systems, and unfortunately as it
turns out must compile Xfree86 from source, due to the
fact that the official alpha packages of debian do not
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 03:34:45AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> I didn't see any information about starting work on getting xfree 4.3
> packaged
> on the X Strike Force page. Therefore, I am taking a little initiative and
> looking at patches in the 4.2 and bringing the >=900 patches up to spee
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 03:12:45AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Why does this patch stop some readme docs from be generated? Is the license
> on
> these files in question?
No, not in question. Clearly non-free. Check the package changelog.
--
G. Branden Robinson|I'm sorr
Package: xlibmesa-dev
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: important
Howdy,
Recent changes to the mesa package aren't reflected in xlibmesa yet.
Packages which used to build-dep on libgl-dev may now need to also add
libglu-dev. xlibmesa should provide this now too (or it will probably
get passed over as a
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 08:56:09AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I'm not trying to sound hostile about it, it's just that it would be a
> > very rude thing to do to our users.
>
> ?? I did never read your messages as hostile. Yuo have been e
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 03:34:45AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> I didn't see any information about starting work on getting xfree 4.3 packaged
> on the X Strike Force page. Therefore, I am taking a little initiative and
> looking at patches in the 4.2 and bringing the >=900 patches up to speed w
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 03:12:45AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Why does this patch stop some readme docs from be generated? Is the license on
> these files in question?
No, not in question. Clearly non-free. Check the package changelog.
--
G. Branden Robinson|I'm sorry i
Package: xlibmesa-dev
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: important
Howdy,
Recent changes to the mesa package aren't reflected in xlibmesa yet.
Packages which used to build-dep on libgl-dev may now need to also add
libglu-dev. xlibmesa should provide this now too (or it will probably
get passed over as a
tag 175102 + moreinfo
retitle 175102 xserver-xfree86: [ati] SEGV on startup
thanks
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 11:05:05PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> However, X cannor start because of two reasons:
>
> 1. 'Load "i2c"' is missing after configuration through 'dpkg-reconfigure
> xserver-xfree86',
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 175102 + moreinfo
Bug#175102: ati driver and two ati cards...
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> retitle 175102 xserver-xfree86: [ati] SEGV on startup
Bug#175102: ati driver and two ati cards...
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping pro
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 08:56:09AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I'm not trying to sound hostile about it, it's just that it would be a
> > very rude thing to do to our users.
>
> ?? I did never read your messages as hostile. Yuo have been e
23 matches
Mail list logo
