Re: xlibs-dev issues and fontconfig/xft2 packages

2002-12-02 Thread Colin Walters
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 06:21, Michel Dänzer wrote: > This is kinda late and may be stating the obvious, but there have been > upstream releases of fontconfig: http://fontconfig.org/ . Uploading this > to sid may be a good idea after all? I don't want to do that before Branden splits xlibs-dev. My

Re: xlibs-dev issues and fontconfig/xft2 packages

2002-12-02 Thread Colin Walters
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 06:21, Michel Dänzer wrote: > This is kinda late and may be stating the obvious, but there have been > upstream releases of fontconfig: http://fontconfig.org/ . Uploading this > to sid may be a good idea after all? I don't want to do that before Branden splits xlibs-dev. M

Processed: your mail

2002-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 157818 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88085 Bug#157818: libgtk2.0-0png3: Screenupdate is broken in gtk-applications like gimp Forwarded-to-address changed from http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100059 to http://bugzilla.g

Processed: your mail

2002-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 157818 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88085 Bug#157818: libgtk2.0-0png3: Screenupdate is broken in gtk-applications like gimp Forwarded-to-address changed from http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100059 to http://bugzilla.gno

Re: xlibs-dev issues and fontconfig/xft2 packages

2002-12-02 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 02:30, Colin Walters wrote: > > I've created packages of fontconfig and libxft2; these are needed at > least for compiling GNOME 2.1. In the future, they're supposed to be > part of the XFree distribution, so these packages are only temporary. > > Note however that my libx

Re: xlibs-dev issues and fontconfig/xft2 packages

2002-12-02 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 02:30, Colin Walters wrote: > > I've created packages of fontconfig and libxft2; these are needed at > least for compiling GNOME 2.1. In the future, they're supposed to be > part of the XFree distribution, so these packages are only temporary. > > Note however that my libx