Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: normal
Several times in the past week the screen on this system has displayed
what should be on the top on the bottom, and what should be on the
bottom on the top. The cursor behaves as if this has not occured.
This has always occured when the s
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: normal
Several times in the past week the screen on this system has displayed
what should be on the top on the bottom, and what should be on the
bottom on the top. The cursor behaves as if this has not occured.
This has always occured when the s
Package: xdm
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
The xdm manpage says that all the same variables are passed to reset
scripts as to the startup scripts.
But that's wrong. DISPLAY is not passed to the reset script.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture
Package: xdm
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
The xdm manpage says that all the same variables are passed to reset
scripts as to the startup scripts.
But that's wrong. DISPLAY is not passed to the reset script.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 04:24:46PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Yes, someone else pointed this out to me. So you didn't have to special
> case it, and wouldn't have needed to even if I hadn't downgraded the
> bug?
I'd marked that bug as applying to the version in testing way back before
woody
Package: xterm
Version: 4.1.0-17
Severity: normal
/etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm-color shouldn't define unnecessary
resources, like how the scrollbar looks like, as the user can't
always override them.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux ay 2.4.18-newpmac #1
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 07:14:30AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Huh? When update_excuses says, eg:
>
> + libcrypt-ssleay-perl (alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k,
> mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc) is (less) buggy! (1 <= 1)
>
> it's doesn't block the package from being c
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 02:53:41PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 12:33:12PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > severity 143825 serious
> > Bug#143825: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?
> > Severity set to `se
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 04:24:46PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Yes, someone else pointed this out to me. So you didn't have to special
> case it, and wouldn't have needed to even if I hadn't downgraded the
> bug?
I'd marked that bug as applying to the version in testing way back before
woody
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 12:33:12PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > severity 143825 serious
> Bug#143825: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?
> Severity set to `serious'.
Is it your intention not to let XFree86 4.2.1-3 propagate into t
Package: xterm
Version: 4.1.0-17
Severity: normal
/etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm-color shouldn't define unnecessary
resources, like how the scrollbar looks like, as the user can't
always override them.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux ay 2.4.18-newpmac #1
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:31:27PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fre, 2002-11-01 at 17:10, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 02:18:56PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > The nv driver has only been fixed for PPC after 4.2.0, i.e. you'd need
> > > current CVS.
> >
> > I didn't
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 07:14:30AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Huh? When update_excuses says, eg:
>
> + libcrypt-ssleay-perl (alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k,
> mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc) is (less) buggy! (1 <= 1)
>
> it's doesn't block the package from being c
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 02:53:41PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 12:33:12PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > severity 143825 serious
> > Bug#143825: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?
> > Severity set to `se
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 143825 serious
Bug#143825: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 12:33:12PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > severity 143825 serious
> Bug#143825: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?
> Severity set to `serious'.
Is it your intention not to let XFree86 4.2.1-3 propagate into t
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:31:27PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fre, 2002-11-01 at 17:10, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 02:18:56PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > The nv driver has only been fixed for PPC after 4.2.0, i.e. you'd need
> > > current CVS.
> >
> > I didn't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 143825 serious
Bug#143825: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Package: libxaw7
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Recently I tried to run xload on a high loaded server (load was more
than 10), and discovered that if window size is rather small, scale
lines are drawn incorrectly (upper than needed).
This is caused by a bug in Xaw/StripChart.c.
It
Package: libxaw7
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Recently I tried to run xload on a high loaded server (load was more
than 10), and discovered that if window size is rather small, scale
lines are drawn incorrectly (upper than needed).
This is caused by a bug in Xaw/StripChart.c.
It
20 matches
Mail list logo
