Branden Robinson wrote:
> If people will build with IGNORE_MANIFEST_CHANGES=3Dyes, we can still
> have 4.2.1-0pre1v1 packages for these architectures. This will cause
> the build to proceed to completion despite MANIFEST differences.
I caught the manifest change yesterday too and just copied .new
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 05:25:23PM -0500, Bryan W. Headley wrote:
> >It's there, it just doesn't nag you every time.
>
> Groovy. It zaps my XF86Config whenever it feels like not nagging me. I
> feel special, for unknown reasons...
The "zapping" is extensively documented.
> >dpkg-reconfigure xse
(just forwarded to debian-x for info)
Le lun 09/09/2002 à 03:16, Xavier Bestel a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have a dual-headed system, with a TNT (nvidia) and an All-In-wonder
> 128 (ati r128) ,running on a dual-pIII VIA VP6. With X 4.1, it runs fine
> (with or without Xinerama & Gatos drivers) (as long
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:28:30AM -0500, Bryan W. Headley wrote:
Installation of 4.2.1 overwrites the /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file.
Wouldn't mind, except it doesn't guess the video sync rates right, and
keeps loading xtt and freetype modules at the same time.
Can we st
Interesting.
We'd really need to have xscope traces in order to find out what's
going on.
Could somebody be so kind as to tell the originator how to generate
xscope traces from the two runs of his Tcl/Tk clients? I'd do it
myself if I zeren't stuck zith this AZERTY keyboqrd.
>> FreeType module? Anti-aliased fonts?
There is no relationship whatsoever between the FreeType module and
AA. AA is done for client-side fonts by Keith's Xft library. Xft
doesn't require the FreeType module.
(It is true that older versions of the Freetype module did implement a
hackish form
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:31:42AM -0400, Maitland Bottoms wrote:
> I have been running some tests with and without xvfb-run.
>
> In short, they fail in xvfb-run, and succeed on my framebuffer.
Yikes, a brief look at xvfb-run reveals syntax errors in it.
I'll fix it up for 4.2.1-0pre1v2; let me
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:28:30AM -0500, Bryan W. Headley wrote:
> Installation of 4.2.1 overwrites the /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file.
> Wouldn't mind, except it doesn't guess the video sync rates right, and
> keeps loading xtt and freetype modules at the same time.
>
> Can we stick in the dialog
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:01:02PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > /me yet again wonders why he bothers to write documentation that no
> > one reads.
>
> FreeType module? Anti-aliased fonts?
I'm sorry, but I am far too dense to get these subtle clues. :)
Is there something you'd like me t
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:22:25PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> MANIFEST check is failed on hppa:
>
> --- debian/MANIFEST.hppa2002-09-08 15:12:03.0 +0900
> +++ debian/MANIFEST.hppa.new2002-09-09 10:36:28.0 +0900
> @@ -7269 +7268,0 @@
> -usr/X11R6/man/man4/imstt.4x
On Aug 08, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> Thanks, Branden, for including the nv driver backport in the latest
> 4.2.0 prerelease (which added support for the GeForce2 Go). I tried
> switching from the *gag* non-free binary driver to nv, and it mostly
> worked, with the following caveats:
I finally got a
> /me yet again wonders why he bothers to write documentation that no
> one reads.
FreeType module? Anti-aliased fonts?
Juliusz
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Those using xlibs 4.2.0 packages are advised to upgrade to xlibs 4.2.1.
>>
>> Changes:
>> xfree86 (4.2.1-0pre1v1) unstable; urgency=low
>> .
>>*** THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL RELEASE. FEEDBACK SHOULD GO TO
>>
also see
Standard Error:
Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
Xlib: No protocol specified
as well.
What brought this up were the 222 errors in
http://www.vtk.org/Testing/Sites/makapuu/Debian-vtk_4.0-1_i386.deb/20020909-0522-Experimental/Test.html
which was using xvfb-run, com
Installation of 4.2.1 overwrites the /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file.
Wouldn't mind, except it doesn't guess the video sync rates right, and
keeps loading xtt and freetype modules at the same time.
Can we stick in the dialog I saw in the 4.1.0 release ("Do you want me
to overwrite your config file?
> Not by default it didn't:
ok * feeling very very stupid at the moment *
I do seem to recall something about hitting that check box...
sorry about that (me == BIGIDIOT) => True
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 09:17:26PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> I upgraded to 4.2.1-0pre1v1 on a Toshiba Laptop in an attempt to
> improve driver throughput. Oddly, the trident driver as packaged in
> this version is slower than the frame buffer driver in 4.1. The most
> obvious change is that dra
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 03:17:55PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> Is it normal that the xfree86_4.2.0.orig.tar.gz
> changes between -pre releases?
Yes, and I think it would make more sense (and would prefer it) if
Branden gave all the pre-release .orig files unique names
(e.g. "4.1.99.pre-1.4.2.0
18 matches
Mail list logo
