On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 10:08:20PM -0400, Mike Martin wrote:
> In order to track down my own problem I've been looking through the
> .debs for some of the other Architectures. The xserver-xfree86 debs for
> the others I have looked at contain the /usr/X11R6/lib/modules directory
> and a whole lot o
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 06:08:56AM +0200, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> The TrueType fonts from xfree86-truetype-fonts[1] are in
> xfree86-nonfree-truetype[2]. xft[3] contains the new Xft stuff from
> http://keithp.com/fonts/, AFAIK it's not available in a Debian package
> yet.
Ah, that stuff.
I've
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 12:00:31PM +0800, Anthony Fok wrote:
> According to www.rpmfind.net, Red Hat's XFree86-truetype-fonts package
> contains:
[...]
> i.e. XFree86-truetype-fonts in Red Hat corresponds to the
> xfonts-scalable-nonfree package in Debian. :-)
Ah, so all Michael had to do wa
Michael Cardenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The new redhat beta, limbo, uses xft and a package called
> xfree86-truetype-fonts for displaying schweet looking fonts.
>
> These packages are not included in the 4.2.0 series of debs. Do they
> just have different names? Is there some reason we do
Hi all,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 10:27:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 04:59:52PM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> > The new redhat beta, limbo, uses xft and a package called
> > xfree86-truetype-fonts for displaying schweet looking fonts.
> >
> > These packages are
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 04:38:56PM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> You did not include patch #135, which allows i810 users to have dri
> without obscure xf86config options.
>
> Do you plan to include this patch? It was mentioned here:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2002/debian-x-200208/m
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 04:59:52PM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> The new redhat beta, limbo, uses xft and a package called
> xfree86-truetype-fonts for displaying schweet looking fonts.
>
> These packages are not included in the 4.2.0 series of debs. Do they
> just have different names? Is the
On Wed, 7 Aug 2002 00:32:06 +0200
Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> the changelog says:/usr/X11R6/lib/modules"
>
> * TODO: mips wants to build the server modules as shared objects
> instead of
> static ones; why?
>
> because the ELF loader doesn't work on mips yet(and sha
On Wed, 7 Aug 2002 22:23:44 -0400
Mike Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 19:15:40 -0400
> Mike Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have a Debian/Woody install on an SGI Indy with the Newport XL-24
> > gfx card. I had a working XFree86 until I upgraded to 4.2.0. Now it
>
The new redhat beta, limbo, uses xft and a package called
xfree86-truetype-fonts for displaying schweet looking fonts.
These packages are not included in the 4.2.0 series of debs. Do they
just have different names? Is there some reason we don't include them?
thanks
michael
--
michael cardena
Hello.
You did not include patch #135, which allows i810 users to have dri
without obscure xf86config options.
Do you plan to include this patch? It was mentioned here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2002/debian-x-200208/msg00011.html
--
michael cardenas
lead software engineer
lindows.co
Thanks, Branden, for including the nv driver backport in the latest
4.2.0 prerelease (which added support for the GeForce2 Go). I tried
switching from the *gag* non-free binary driver to nv, and it mostly
worked, with the following caveats:
- Segfault when the glx driver was loaded. There were t
Hello,
since I've installed Xfree4.2 packages on my machine, I'm seeing a
strange graphics error with all Mozilla buttons: There are some pixels
missing on each of the four corners (see screenshot on
http://atschlichter33.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mozilla.png).
When I drag another window over the
[I am not subscribed to debian-hppa.]
Thanks as usual to ISHIKAWA Mutsumi for rolling these.
--
G. Branden Robinson| You live and learn.
Debian GNU/Linux | Or you don't live long.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Robert Heinlein
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 05:41:37PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> Of cause yes :-)
> I'm building it on my hppa box (but my hppa box 735/125 is old and
> slow, please wait a few hours...)
yikes -- you could build on paer.debian.org which is an A500 and should
give sustantially faster compile t
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can you modify the source tree on the hppa box you're using and go ahead
>> and build? There's no reason to make hppa folks wait until 0pre1v3 for
>> this if there are no other build-time problems.
OK, 0pre1v2
Consors France, à
la pointe de l'innovation en matière d
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 09:47:02AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>
>> Can you modify the source tree on the hppa box you're using and go ahead
>> and build? There's no reason to make hppa folks wait until 0pre1v
[I am not subscribed to debian-alpha or debian-superh.]
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 09:41:28AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> Built on alpha, sparc and sh4 are successfull.
These are now available at the X Strike Force as well. Thanks!
--
G. Branden Robinson| You could wire
[I am not subscribed to debian-hppa]
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 09:47:02AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> I forget to say about xserver-xfree86.files.hppa.
> /usr/X11R6/man/man4/nv.4 is also missing from xserver-xfree86.files.hppa
> tiny Patch to fix it is here:
>
>
> http://people.debian.org
See subject.
Those of you with NVidia video hardware will likely be interested in
these.
--
G. Branden Robinson|I must despise the world which does
Debian GNU/Linux |not know that music is a higher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |revelation than a
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I tried add the following line to my sources.list:
>> deb-src http://people.debian.org/~branden/ sid/
It is wrong. Please add these:
deb http://people.debian.org/~branden/ sid/$(ARCH)/
deb-src http://people.debia
22 matches
Mail list logo
