Re: xtt/freetype grumpy

2002-07-13 Thread Russell Neches
Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In 4.1, you could load them simultaneously, in which case the first > one loaded would be the one that manages TrueType fonts. In 4.2, > due to an accidental name clash, the loader will not allow you to > load both. > > In 4.3, if two modules reg

Re: xtt/freetype grumpy

2002-07-13 Thread Russell Neches
Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In 4.1, you could load them simultaneously, in which case the first > one loaded would be the one that manages TrueType fonts. In 4.2, > due to an accidental name clash, the loader will not allow you to > load both. > > In 4.3, if two modules re

Re: xtt/freetype grumpy

2002-07-13 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
RN> However, X still refused to start on account of a duplicate symbol for RN> freetype in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libxtt.a. Removing xtt from RN> the configuration "fixed" the problem. That's okay. X-TT and FreeType have always been mutually exclusive. They should not be loaded simultaneou

Re: xtt/freetype grumpy

2002-07-13 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
RN> However, X still refused to start on account of a duplicate symbol for RN> freetype in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libxtt.a. Removing xtt from RN> the configuration "fixed" the problem. That's okay. X-TT and FreeType have always been mutually exclusive. They should not be loaded simultaneo

gcc 3.1 vs XF4.2

2002-07-13 Thread Jack Howarth
Hello, Has anyone else tried to rebuild Branden's test xfree86 4.2.0-0pre1v1 packages against the current gcc 3.1.1? On debian ppc sid, I find that while the build appears to work in general there is at least one glitch compared to the gcc 2.95.4 build. I see under the gcc 3.1 packages the follo