On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 04:26:02PM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> I'm okay with locale problems - I badly need a working XFree86 4.2
> setup.
>
> I wonder if you could upgrade your packages. They seem to be based off
> a prerelease, and I don't think that version has the fix I need.
I have a .deb
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 04:40:44PM -0400, Shaya Potter wrote:
> The reason I didn't make an apt repository is that these debs are not
> perfect, and have some serious issues (most notably I found with locale
> problems on my machine)
Hi,
I'm okay with locale problems - I badly need a working XFre
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 17:09, Steffen Neumann wrote:
>
> I am trying to build an X11_to_MPEG converter
> using xmx (www.cs.brown.edu/software/xmx/,
> which was part of Debian back in 1999,
> now compiled from source.)
> to multiplex the X11 Desktop to both
> the local :0 Display, as well as a X
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 04:26:02PM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> I'm okay with locale problems - I badly need a working XFree86 4.2
> setup.
>
> I wonder if you could upgrade your packages. They seem to be based off
> a prerelease, and I don't think that version has the fix I need.
I have a .deb
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 04:40:44PM -0400, Shaya Potter wrote:
> The reason I didn't make an apt repository is that these debs are not
> perfect, and have some serious issues (most notably I found with locale
> problems on my machine)
Hi,
I'm okay with locale problems - I badly need a working XFr
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 17:09, Steffen Neumann wrote:
>
> I am trying to build an X11_to_MPEG converter
> using xmx (www.cs.brown.edu/software/xmx/,
> which was part of Debian back in 1999,
> now compiled from source.)
> to multiplex the X11 Desktop to both
> the local :0 Display, as well as a
The reason I didn't make an apt repository is that these debs are not
perfect, and have some serious issues (most notably I found with locale
problems on my machine)
the server seems fine, but if people upgrade their entire X based on
this repository, as most are going to do with apt, then they mi
On Fri 24 May 2002 11:34, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 12:54:22AM +0100, John Gay wrote:
> > On Sat 18 May 2002 22:23, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 23:07, John Gay wrote:
> > > > I've got a GVX1 video card, which is only supported by xfree86>4.2.0
I was not awar
I've put up a mirror of spotter's debs at
http://chunk.mp3revolution.net/~aaronl/x for two reasons. One, I want
to apt-get the debs, and the original site on columbia.edu did not
have a Packages file. I've corrected this locally on my mirror. Also,
I was only able to download from the primary site
The reason I didn't make an apt repository is that these debs are not
perfect, and have some serious issues (most notably I found with locale
problems on my machine)
the server seems fine, but if people upgrade their entire X based on
this repository, as most are going to do with apt, then they m
On Fri 24 May 2002 11:34, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 12:54:22AM +0100, John Gay wrote:
> > On Sat 18 May 2002 22:23, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 23:07, John Gay wrote:
> > > > I've got a GVX1 video card, which is only supported by xfree86>4.2.0
I was not awa
I've put up a mirror of spotter's debs at
http://chunk.mp3revolution.net/~aaronl/x for two reasons. One, I want
to apt-get the debs, and the original site on columbia.edu did not
have a Packages file. I've corrected this locally on my mirror. Also,
I was only able to download from the primary site
On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 12:54:22AM +0100, John Gay wrote:
> On Sat 18 May 2002 22:23, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 23:07, John Gay wrote:
> > > I've got a GVX1 video card, which is only supported by xfree86>4.2.0 so I
> > > had the sources for 4.2.0 on a CD, so a little reading of
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:07:19PM +0100, John Gay wrote:
> I realise this is not exactly a support forum, but,
>
> I've got a GVX1 video card, which is only supported by xfree86>4.2.0 so I had
Huh, the GVX1 is supported on 4.1.0, the support is better in 4.2.0 but
mostly for video stuff. Well,
On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 12:54:22AM +0100, John Gay wrote:
> On Sat 18 May 2002 22:23, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 23:07, John Gay wrote:
> > > I've got a GVX1 video card, which is only supported by xfree86>4.2.0 so I
> > > had the sources for 4.2.0 on a CD, so a little reading o
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:07:19PM +0100, John Gay wrote:
> I realise this is not exactly a support forum, but,
>
> I've got a GVX1 video card, which is only supported by xfree86>4.2.0 so I had
Huh, the GVX1 is supported on 4.1.0, the support is better in 4.2.0 but
mostly for video stuff. Well,
16 matches
Mail list logo
