Re: XFree86 on mips cleanup patch

2001-07-25 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 06:38:58PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 09:38:13PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote: > > > Hi, > > > the attached patch removes some previous workarounds by adding proper > > > functions to compiler.h for mips(

Re: XFree86 on mips cleanup patch

2001-07-25 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 06:38:58PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 09:38:13PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote: > > > Hi, > > > the attached patch removes some previous workarounds by adding proper > > > functions to compiler.h for mips

Re: XFree86 on mips cleanup patch

2001-07-25 Thread Stephen Frost
* Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 09:38:13PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote: > > Hi, > > the attached patch removes some previous workarounds by adding proper > > functions to compiler.h for mips(el). This obsoletes the disabling of > > the ati driver on mips(351) and

Re: XFree86 on mips cleanup patch

2001-07-25 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 05:51:00PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > Are the below asm functions going to affect other architectures? No. > I don't see them wrapped in any sort of arch specific defines. Because this patch is already inside just such an #if. See c. line 787 of xc/programs/Xserver/hw/x

Re: XFree86 on mips cleanup patch

2001-07-25 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 09:38:13PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote: > Hi, > the attached patch removes some previous workarounds by adding proper > functions to compiler.h for mips(el). This obsoletes the disabling of > the ati driver on mips(351) and the int10 module(350) on mipsel as well > as the me

Re: XFree86 on mips cleanup patch

2001-07-25 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 09:38:13PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote: > the attached patch removes some previous workarounds by adding proper > functions to compiler.h for mips(el). This obsoletes the disabling of > the ati driver on mips(351) and the int10 module(350) on mipsel as well > as the mem_barr

XFree86 on mips cleanup patch

2001-07-25 Thread Guido Guenther
Hi, the attached patch removes some previous workarounds by adding proper functions to compiler.h for mips(el). This obsoletes the disabling of the ati driver on mips(351) and the int10 module(350) on mipsel as well as the mem_barrier patch(353). I've also attached the newport range fix for complet

Re: XFree86 on mips cleanup patch

2001-07-25 Thread Stephen Frost
* Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 09:38:13PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote: > > Hi, > > the attached patch removes some previous workarounds by adding proper > > functions to compiler.h for mips(el). This obsoletes the disabling of > > the ati driver on mips(351) and

Re: XFree86 on mips cleanup patch

2001-07-25 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 05:51:00PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > Are the below asm functions going to affect other architectures? No. > I don't see them wrapped in any sort of arch specific defines. Because this patch is already inside just such an #if. See c. line 787 of xc/programs/Xserver/hw/

Re: XFree86 on mips cleanup patch

2001-07-25 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 09:38:13PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote: > Hi, > the attached patch removes some previous workarounds by adding proper > functions to compiler.h for mips(el). This obsoletes the disabling of > the ati driver on mips(351) and the int10 module(350) on mipsel as well > as the m

sparc X mozilla crash: negative sized edge and beziers this big

2001-07-25 Thread Adam Di Carlo
On sparc using the new(ish?) xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5, running both skipstone and mozilla both result in X server crashes. Skipstone reports: Fatal server error: Beziers this big not yet supported Mozilla reports: Fatal server error: negative sized edge? Is this a mozilla bug? T

Re: XFree86 on mips cleanup patch

2001-07-25 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 09:38:13PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote: > the attached patch removes some previous workarounds by adding proper > functions to compiler.h for mips(el). This obsoletes the disabling of > the ati driver on mips(351) and the int10 module(350) on mipsel as well > as the mem_bar

XFree86 on mips cleanup patch

2001-07-25 Thread Guido Guenther
Hi, the attached patch removes some previous workarounds by adding proper functions to compiler.h for mips(el). This obsoletes the disabling of the ati driver on mips(351) and the int10 module(350) on mipsel as well as the mem_barrier patch(353). I've also attached the newport range fix for comple

Re: Bug in Xgalaga?

2001-07-25 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
MB> Yesterday I installed kernel 2.4.6 (I used 2.2.17) and now Xgalaga does NOT MB> crash anymore! Pity, twere good if we could debug this problem. But it may simply be a DRI version problem. MB> About X, I still can't get X to run on 1280x1024 [...] MB> (II) I810(0): Clock range: 12.00 to 13

Re: Bug in Xgalaga?

2001-07-25 Thread Manuel Bilderbeek
Hi people, Yesterday I installed kernel 2.4.6 (I used 2.2.17) and now Xgalaga does NOT crash anymore! Also, a problem I had with XMMS (it did some fast-forwarding, irratically) seems to be solved now. An other problem with sound is the following: I only get sound when I do this: rmmod i810_audio