Re: Debian X FAQ updated

2001-06-18 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:34:10PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > +bits-per-pixel; the number of bits per pixel for a given color depth is an > > +usually an issue for only the author of a hardware driver to worry about. > > You have an extra "an" at the end of that first line above. Thanks, fixed

Re: Debian X FAQ updated

2001-06-18 Thread Ben Collins
> +bits-per-pixel; the number of bits per pixel for a given color depth is an > +usually an issue for only the author of a hardware driver to worry about. You have an extra "an" at the end of that first line above. -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- /

Debian X FAQ updated

2001-06-18 Thread Branden Robinson
This will go into the next 4.1.0 prerelease. Just thought I'd give you guys a heads-up. A few questions have been added, and a few have been updated in the wake XFree86 4.0. --- FAQ~Mon Jun 18 22:09:08 2001 +++ FAQ Mon Jun 18 22:09:32 2001 @@ -1,12 +1,13 @@ Debian X Window System Freque

Re: Debian X FAQ updated

2001-06-18 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:34:10PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > +bits-per-pixel; the number of bits per pixel for a given color depth is an > > +usually an issue for only the author of a hardware driver to worry about. > > You have an extra "an" at the end of that first line above. Thanks, fixe

Re: Debian X FAQ updated

2001-06-18 Thread Ben Collins
> +bits-per-pixel; the number of bits per pixel for a given color depth is an > +usually an issue for only the author of a hardware driver to worry about. You have an extra "an" at the end of that first line above. -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- /

Debian X FAQ updated

2001-06-18 Thread Branden Robinson
This will go into the next 4.1.0 prerelease. Just thought I'd give you guys a heads-up. A few questions have been added, and a few have been updated in the wake XFree86 4.0. --- FAQ~Mon Jun 18 22:09:08 2001 +++ FAQ Mon Jun 18 22:09:32 2001 @@ -1,12 +1,13 @@ Debian X Window System Frequ