Re: [Fonts]Re: Fonts in XFree86 4.1.0

2001-06-07 Thread Keith Packard
Around 21 o'clock on Jun 7, "Mike A. Harris" wrote: > 2) What work needs to be done to xfs/Xserver to finish the job >(itemized preferably), and how complex would this work be to >get done? What amount of timeframe would it take? PCF was designed to support multiple encodings from the

Re: [Fonts]Re: Fonts in XFree86 4.1.0

2001-06-07 Thread Keith Packard
Around 21 o'clock on Jun 7, "Mike A. Harris" wrote: > 2) What work needs to be done to xfs/Xserver to finish the job >(itemized preferably), and how complex would this work be to >get done? What amount of timeframe would it take? PCF was designed to support multiple encodings from the s

Re: Fonts in XFree86 4.1.0

2001-06-07 Thread Keith Packard
Around 18 o'clock on Jun 7, Branden Robinson wrote: > 2) a significant portion of the client-side apps know to ask for ISO 10646 > (and better-specified fonts in general) I hope this never happens -- using 10646 X fonts will bloat the X server and all applications by a huge amount. If w

Re: Fonts in XFree86 4.1.0

2001-06-07 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Branden Robinson wrote: >Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 18:41:44 -0500 >From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: devel@xfree86.org >Cc: debian-x@lists.debian.org >Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasG

Re: non-latin keyboard with unicode ?

2001-06-07 Thread Drew Parsons
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 11:35:37AM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > On 03.VI.2001 at 02:14 Drew Parsons wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 02:48:16PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > > > On 27.V.2001 at 04:00 Drew Parsons wrote: > > > > > > > > [...] and setting LC-CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R. > > > > > > Set

Re: Several installation bugs

2001-06-07 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 02:36:31AM +0200, André Dahlqvist wrote: > I just installed XFree86 4.0.3-7 No, you didn't. Not a Debian package of it, anyway. Hint: the latest Debian release of XFree86 is 4.0.3-4. -- G. Branden Robinson |Kissing girls is a goodness. It is a Debian GN

Re: Fonts in XFree86 4.1.0

2001-06-07 Thread Keith Packard
Around 18 o'clock on Jun 7, Branden Robinson wrote: > 2) a significant portion of the client-side apps know to ask for ISO 10646 > (and better-specified fonts in general) I hope this never happens -- using 10646 X fonts will bloat the X server and all applications by a huge amount. If

Re: Fonts in XFree86 4.1.0

2001-06-07 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Branden Robinson wrote: >Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 18:41:44 -0500 >From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" >

Re: Fonts in XFree86 4.1.0

2001-06-07 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 06:01:41PM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote: > The fonts are now all generated at build time from ISO10646 > masters correct? Our 75dpi package went from 1.2Mb to 10Mb, so I > looked in it and see ISO8859-[1-15] inside now. The filenames > seem much more organized now, but will

Re: Fonts in XFree86 4.1.0

2001-06-07 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 06:01:41PM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote: > The fonts are now all generated at build time from ISO10646 > masters correct? Our 75dpi package went from 1.2Mb to 10Mb, so I > looked in it and see ISO8859-[1-15] inside now. The filenames > seem much more organized now, but wil