Re: xbooks package

2001-06-02 Thread Branden Robinson
Guys, please cut it out with the private CC's. -- G. Branden Robinson | "I came, I saw, she conquered." The Debian GNU/Linux| original Latin seems to have been [EMAIL PROTECTED] | garbled. http://www.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinl

Re: xbooks package

2001-06-02 Thread Michel Dänzer
Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:20:25AM -0700, Ron Steinke wrote: > > I noticed that there's no version of the xbooks package in > > testing/unstable. Is this due to the upgrade to XFree86 4.0? > > Has the X windows API changed that much? Will there be an upgraded > >

Re: xbooks package

2001-06-02 Thread Ron Steinke
> From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:20:25AM -0700, Ron Steinke wrote: > > I noticed that there's no version of the xbooks package in > > testing/unstable. Is this due to the upgrade to XFree86 4.0? > > Has the X windows API changed that much? Will there b

Re: xbooks package

2001-06-02 Thread Michel Dänzer
Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:20:25AM -0700, Ron Steinke wrote: > > I noticed that there's no version of the xbooks package in > > testing/unstable. Is this due to the upgrade to XFree86 4.0? > > Has the X windows API changed that much? Will there be an upgraded > >

Re: xbooks package

2001-06-02 Thread Ron Steinke
> From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:20:25AM -0700, Ron Steinke wrote: > > I noticed that there's no version of the xbooks package in > > testing/unstable. Is this due to the upgrade to XFree86 4.0? > > Has the X windows API changed that much? Will there

Re: xbooks package

2001-06-02 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:20:25AM -0700, Ron Steinke wrote: > I noticed that there's no version of the xbooks package in > testing/unstable. Is this due to the upgrade to XFree86 4.0? > Has the X windows API changed that much? Will there be an upgraded > version of this package at some point

Re: xbooks package

2001-06-02 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:20:25AM -0700, Ron Steinke wrote: > I noticed that there's no version of the xbooks package in > testing/unstable. Is this due to the upgrade to XFree86 4.0? > Has the X windows API changed that much? Will there be an upgraded > version of this package at some poin

Re: non-latin keyboard with unicode ?

2001-06-02 Thread Drew Parsons
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 02:48:16PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > On 27.V.2001 at 04:00 Drew Parsons wrote: > > > > [...] and setting LC-CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R. > > Set it to ru_RU.UTF-8 or else the keyboard will continue to generate > KOI8-R encoded Cyrillic. Or better just unset it. Your en_AU.UT

Re: non-latin keyboard with unicode ?

2001-06-02 Thread Drew Parsons
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 02:48:16PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > On 27.V.2001 at 04:00 Drew Parsons wrote: > > > > [...] and setting LC-CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R. > > Set it to ru_RU.UTF-8 or else the keyboard will continue to generate > KOI8-R encoded Cyrillic. Or better just unset it. Your en_AU.U

Re: non-latin keyboard with unicode ?

2001-06-02 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On 27.V.2001 at 04:00 Drew Parsons wrote: > > [...] and setting LC-CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R. Set it to ru_RU.UTF-8 or else the keyboard will continue to generate KOI8-R encoded Cyrillic. Or better just unset it. Your en_AU.UTF-8 locale should be able to handle Cyrillic. > But the last step is keyboa

Re: non-latin keyboard with unicode ?

2001-06-02 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On 27.V.2001 at 04:00 Drew Parsons wrote: > > [...] and setting LC-CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R. Set it to ru_RU.UTF-8 or else the keyboard will continue to generate KOI8-R encoded Cyrillic. Or better just unset it. Your en_AU.UTF-8 locale should be able to handle Cyrillic. > But the last step is keybo