Is *this* adjustable via Modlines?

2001-02-13 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello I have a big problem: I've just bought a 22" Belinea 108080 monitor for about $900 but it does not work as I expected it to. I have a normal 1600x1200 modeline and everything seems to look good at the first glance, but when I switch to small fonts I see that they are rendered unreadable - t

Is *this* adjustable via Modlines?

2001-02-13 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello I have a big problem: I've just bought a 22" Belinea 108080 monitor for about $900 but it does not work as I expected it to. I have a normal 1600x1200 modeline and everything seems to look good at the first glance, but when I switch to small fonts I see that they are rendered unreadable -

xfonts package in woody

2001-02-13 Thread Fumitoshi UKAI
IIRC, xfonts policy has been changed on xfree86 4.0. Until xfree86 4.0, xfonts package depends on xbase-clients (>= 3.3.3.1-5). Now xfree86 4.0, xfonts package depends on xutils and conclicts with xbase-clients (<< 4.0). (For example xfonts-base) However, current woody's Packages file still poin

Re: Roll-your-own X packages

2001-02-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 09:02:13PM +, Jules Bean wrote: > Hi there, > > I've recently built, and am now using, an XFree86 build from DRI CVS. > This greatly improves 3D performance on my card (a voodoo3). > > Of course, it's a bit annoying running X out of /usr/local, so... how > hard would i

xfonts package in woody

2001-02-13 Thread Fumitoshi UKAI
IIRC, xfonts policy has been changed on xfree86 4.0. Until xfree86 4.0, xfonts package depends on xbase-clients (>= 3.3.3.1-5). Now xfree86 4.0, xfonts package depends on xutils and conclicts with xbase-clients (<< 4.0). (For example xfonts-base) However, current woody's Packages file still poi

Re: Roll-your-own X packages

2001-02-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 09:02:13PM +, Jules Bean wrote: > Hi there, > > I've recently built, and am now using, an XFree86 build from DRI CVS. > This greatly improves 3D performance on my card (a voodoo3). > > Of course, it's a bit annoying running X out of /usr/local, so... how > hard would

Re: Roll-your-own X packages

2001-02-13 Thread Michel Dänzer
Jules Bean wrote: > Alternatively, does Branden ever fold in DRI versions into his > packages? Very unlikely. > How long would I be in this unpackaged state before my local sid mirror had > up-to-date packages? Couple of monts (until the next major XFree86 release, 4.1.0). The DRI tree gets mer

Re: NeoMagic + 4.0.2 = freeze

2001-02-13 Thread Michel Dänzer
Scott Bronson wrote: > > It just happened to me when I was using a Mozilla window. > All the XTerming in the world doesn't seem to trigger > it at all. My machine is up for days, then I start using > a GUI-intensive app and half an hour later I'm rebooting > the machine. Arg. > > Is there an XF

Re: Roll-your-own X packages

2001-02-13 Thread Michel Dänzer
Jules Bean wrote: > Alternatively, does Branden ever fold in DRI versions into his > packages? Very unlikely. > How long would I be in this unpackaged state before my local sid mirror had > up-to-date packages? Couple of monts (until the next major XFree86 release, 4.1.0). The DRI tree gets me

Re: NeoMagic + 4.0.2 = freeze

2001-02-13 Thread Michel Dänzer
Scott Bronson wrote: > > It just happened to me when I was using a Mozilla window. > All the XTerming in the world doesn't seem to trigger > it at all. My machine is up for days, then I start using > a GUI-intensive app and half an hour later I'm rebooting > the machine. Arg. > > Is there an X