On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 02:18:25PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 02:28:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > .orig.tar.gz's typically don't accompany Debian package revisions greater
> > than -1.
> It did with -8 and didn't I see it with -9 in the dsc? Oh well,
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 02:18:25PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 02:28:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > .orig.tar.gz's typically don't accompany Debian package revisions greater
> > than -1.
> It did with -8 and didn't I see it with -9 in the dsc? Oh well,
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 04:03:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Sorry to disturbe you, but i get some troubles with the new release of
> XFree (4.0.1-9) and I 'd like to know where i can find the former realease
> 4.0.1-8 which worked better on my laptop.
> I hope you can help me.
Please NEVER
- Forwarded message from Mathias Chauvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Mathias Chauvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: XFree4.0.1-8
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 15:14:21 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messag
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 04:03:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Sorry to disturbe you, but i get some troubles with the new release of
> XFree (4.0.1-9) and I 'd like to know where i can find the former realease
> 4.0.1-8 which worked better on my laptop.
> I hope you can help me.
Please NEVE
- Forwarded message from Mathias Chauvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Mathias Chauvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: XFree4.0.1-8
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 15:14:21 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messa
* Frederik Vanrenterghem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001202 08:46]:
> I've tried recompiling the kernel (a 2.4.0test10), but that didn't work
> out, probably due to my Asus A7V motherboard or Duron 700 CPU or
> something.
uhhh... this should be investigated. Compiling an application is a
fairly straightf
On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Richard Ayotte wrote:
>* Don't overclock bus speed in the bios unless you're ready to do some
> soldering on your Duron. - (Not recommended)
Didn't do that.
>* If you're using the font servers (xfs or xfstt), make sure they are
> running before you start X. X
Sounds like you've got the exact same hardware that I do, Asus A7V, Duron
700, Matrox G200 (or some kind of MGA card), kernel 2.4.0test10 and rest
assured that this hardware works extremely well with woody and the
2.4.0test10. I can honestly can say that, I've never seen my system work so
well, inc
Hi,
I've been trying to get my comp running X, but with no success this
far. I'm running the latest 2.2.18pre from Woody, and I've tried both
mga_drv.o from Woody and from the Matrox website. Also, I've tried playing
with some options in XF86Config-4, all with no luck.
Every time I do startx, the
* Frederik Vanrenterghem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001202 08:46]:
> I've tried recompiling the kernel (a 2.4.0test10), but that didn't work
> out, probably due to my Asus A7V motherboard or Duron 700 CPU or
> something.
uhhh... this should be investigated. Compiling an application is a
fairly straight
On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Richard Ayotte wrote:
>* Don't overclock bus speed in the bios unless you're ready to do some
> soldering on your Duron. - (Not recommended)
Didn't do that.
>* If you're using the font servers (xfs or xfstt), make sure they are
> running before you start X.
Sounds like you've got the exact same hardware that I do, Asus A7V, Duron
700, Matrox G200 (or some kind of MGA card), kernel 2.4.0test10 and rest
assured that this hardware works extremely well with woody and the
2.4.0test10. I can honestly can say that, I've never seen my system work so
well, in
Hi,
I've been trying to get my comp running X, but with no success this
far. I'm running the latest 2.2.18pre from Woody, and I've tried both
mga_drv.o from Woody and from the Matrox website. Also, I've tried playing
with some options in XF86Config-4, all with no luck.
Every time I do startx, th
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 02:28:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> .orig.tar.gz's typically don't accompany Debian package revisions greater
> than -1.
It did with -8 and didn't I see it with -9 in the dsc? Oh well, you know
what your are doing, I don't have the files here to check again.
> >,
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 02:28:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> .orig.tar.gz's typically don't accompany Debian package revisions greater
> than -1.
It did with -8 and didn't I see it with -9 in the dsc? Oh well, you know
what your are doing, I don't have the files here to check again.
> >,
* Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001201 22:07]:
> Okay, I'm going to send what I've gotten just to you, since it's rather
> much and you might decide what should be sent to debian-x.
Well, I like to see everything, and I imagine anyone else would like to
see everything too. :)
> First my XF86Conf
* Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001201 22:07]:
> Okay, I'm going to send what I've gotten just to you, since it's rather
> much and you might decide what should be sent to debian-x.
Well, I like to see everything, and I imagine anyone else would like to
see everything too. :)
> First my XF86Con
18 matches
Mail list logo
