- Forwarded message from Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "Norbert Veber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DGA problems in 4.0.1
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 02:04:04 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID:
Hi,
Some info and feedback on DRI in 2.2.18pre. Chip Salzenberg posted a patch
for 2.2.18pre21 that upgrades drm to 2.0.0 levels. This lets the G400 work
with xf4 as is in woody. Without this patch DRI does not work for G400s.
TIA,
Ed Tomlinson
On November 23, 2000 07:29 pm, Ed Tomlins
I know how to have xdm use the indirect and chooser features
to work with external X terminals and determine where they go.
Works great, but it leaves me with a simple question ...
Is there a clean way to specify that the locally managed
display should be indirected (like a terminal would be)
for
Hi,
Some info and feedback on DRI in 2.2.18pre. Chip Salzenberg posted a patch
for 2.2.18pre21 that upgrades drm to 2.0.0 levels. This lets the G400 work
with xf4 as is in woody. Without this patch DRI does not work for G400s.
TIA,
Ed Tomlinson
On November 23, 2000 07:29 pm, Ed Tomlin
I know how to have xdm use the indirect and chooser features
to work with external X terminals and determine where they go.
Works great, but it leaves me with a simple question ...
Is there a clean way to specify that the locally managed
display should be indirected (like a terminal would be)
fo
This has actually been going on for a couple months. I've swapped out
window manager and display manager, ditching gnome for the time being. As
far as I can recall, stability was fine during -phase1.
Hardware configuration:
Dual P200mmx on a piix3 chipset(430HX), APICs enabled. Video:
00:0a.0 VGA
This has actually been going on for a couple months. I've swapped out
window manager and display manager, ditching gnome for the time being. As
far as I can recall, stability was fine during -phase1.
Hardware configuration:
Dual P200mmx on a piix3 chipset(430HX), APICs enabled. Video:
00:0a.0 VG
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 04:29:49PM +0200, hugo wrote:
> This is a rather odd situation. I'll just summarize, I have two
> machines, a desktop called baboon, and a laptop called gorilla:
ARGH! Damn it! I lie!
Sorry, the upgrade I did three hours ago appears to have fixed this.
xmms now runs fine,
This is a rather odd situation. I'll just summarize, I have two
machines, a desktop called baboon, and a laptop called gorilla:
When running xmms on baboon, but directing output to gorilla (connected
to baboon with ssh -X), xmms segfaults.
When running xmms on gorilla (same version), output to ba
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 04:29:49PM +0200, hugo wrote:
> This is a rather odd situation. I'll just summarize, I have two
> machines, a desktop called baboon, and a laptop called gorilla:
ARGH! Damn it! I lie!
Sorry, the upgrade I did three hours ago appears to have fixed this.
xmms now runs fine,
This is a rather odd situation. I'll just summarize, I have two
machines, a desktop called baboon, and a laptop called gorilla:
When running xmms on baboon, but directing output to gorilla (connected
to baboon with ssh -X), xmms segfaults.
When running xmms on gorilla (same version), output to b
11 matches
Mail list logo
