On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 01:16:05PM -0800, Jason Mealins wrote:
> Thanks a bunch that actually fixed the problem, I guess it has to be
> something with how tdfx renders 24bit color. but then I am not too sure,
> don't know much about the graphics programming. just curious, any chance
> I could see
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 09:55:30PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> All suggestions for the mouse device use the old device names, devfs
> has them in subdirectories. Please use the new names when devfs is used.
You're going to have to tell me what these are. I asked on IRC what I
should use, and
[poor email etiquitte with the idea that this may help other users in
the future.]
*THIS* fixed your problem? Ok. This is strange.
Someone reported this to Branden a little while ago (I think before he
put X 4.0.1 into unstable) and some of us tried to replicate this
problem, but with no succe
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 01:16:05PM -0800, Jason Mealins wrote:
> Thanks a bunch that actually fixed the problem, I guess it has to be
> something with how tdfx renders 24bit color. but then I am not too sure,
> don't know much about the graphics programming. just curious, any chance
> I could see
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 09:55:30PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> All suggestions for the mouse device use the old device names, devfs
> has them in subdirectories. Please use the new names when devfs is used.
You're going to have to tell me what these are. I asked on IRC what I
should use, an
Thanks a bunch that actually fixed the problem, I guess it has to be something
with how tdfx renders 24bit color. but then I am not too sure, don't know much
about the graphics programming.
just curious, any chance I could see your XF86Config-4 file?
Jason Mealins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In reply to
* J. R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001115 04:04]:
> I just realized this discussion was cc'ed to debian-x.
D'oh! :) Yeah, I've had those days. :)
> I wasn't sure what your relation to Branden was; I figured you were an
> intern at his new job. (your original mail was long, much formatting, and
Hello!
How can I configure a la-latin keyboard. It is a variant of the
spanish. kbd has a la-latin.
--
Carlos Barros.
i actually run the 4.01 debs @ 1600x1200 16bpp on a voodoo3 2000 agp...
but did get similar at 24bpp... try 16bpp.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 11:09:03AM -0800, Jason Mealins wrote:
> Just upgraded from 3.3.6 to 4.0.1-3 and 1600x1200 no longer works, every res
> below it does. There is no log errors
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 11:09:03AM -0800, Jason Mealins wrote:
> Just upgraded from 3.3.6 to 4.0.1-3 and 1600x1200 no longer works,
> every res below it does. There is no log errors, just when 1600x1200
> launches, it scruches the entire screen to the top of the monitor.
This seems to be a known i
Just upgraded from 3.3.6 to 4.0.1-3 and 1600x1200 no longer works, every res
below it does. There is no log errors, just when 1600x1200 launches, it
scruches the entire screen to the top of the monitor. Can't figure out what has
been changed. between the two. Any help would be great. also tdfx d
Thanks a bunch that actually fixed the problem, I guess it has to be something with
how tdfx renders 24bit color. but then I am not too sure, don't know much about the
graphics programming.
just curious, any chance I could see your XF86Config-4 file?
Jason Mealins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In re
* J. R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001115 04:04]:
> I just realized this discussion was cc'ed to debian-x.
D'oh! :) Yeah, I've had those days. :)
> I wasn't sure what your relation to Branden was; I figured you were an
> intern at his new job. (your original mail was long, much formatting, and
Hello!
How can I configure a la-latin keyboard. It is a variant of the
spanish. kbd has a la-latin.
--
Carlos Barros.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i actually run the 4.01 debs @ 1600x1200 16bpp on a voodoo3 2000 agp...
but did get similar at 24bpp... try 16bpp.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 11:09:03AM -0800, Jason Mealins wrote:
> Just upgraded from 3.3.6 to 4.0.1-3 and 1600x1200 no longer works, every res below
>it does. There is no log errors
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 11:09:03AM -0800, Jason Mealins wrote:
> Just upgraded from 3.3.6 to 4.0.1-3 and 1600x1200 no longer works,
> every res below it does. There is no log errors, just when 1600x1200
> launches, it scruches the entire screen to the top of the monitor.
This seems to be a known
Gerhard Kroder wrote:
>
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.0.1-3
>
> Hi there,
sorry, just saw this list is not for "user support".. i'll ask at
debian-user instead.
gk
Just upgraded from 3.3.6 to 4.0.1-3 and 1600x1200 no longer works, every res below it
does. There is no log errors, just when 1600x1200 launches, it scruches the entire
screen to the top of the monitor. Can't figure out what has been changed. between the
two. Any help would be great. also tdfx
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.0.1-3
Hi there,
after upgrading from 3.3.6 to 4.* my X(Free86) is out of order, i don't
get it running any more on my own. I took a
look on debian-x mailing list and found one similar problem (Michiel
Mieeuwissens's), which ended up (AFAIK) with no
solutuon.
Gerhard Kroder wrote:
>
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.0.1-3
>
> Hi there,
sorry, just saw this list is not for "user support".. i'll ask at
debian-user instead.
gk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.0.1-3
Hi there,
after upgrading from 3.3.6 to 4.* my X(Free86) is out of order, i don't
get it running any more on my own. I took a
look on debian-x mailing list and found one similar problem (Michiel
Mieeuwissens's), which ended up (AFAIK) with no
solutuon.
Seth,
I just realized this discussion was cc'ed to debian-x.
I wasn't sure what your relation to Branden was; I figured you were an
intern at his new job. (your original mail was long, much formatting, and
I read it in a small, badly fonted win terminal, in a glare, which was
difficult.)
I now
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 10:57:10PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> * Robert Braddock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001114 22:17]:
> > > Tenth idea -- the log file mentions the machine hasn't mtrr support.
> > > Perhaps this needs to be enabled in your kernel?
> >
> > What's MTRR anyway? I haven't changed the k
Seth,
I just realized this discussion was cc'ed to debian-x.
I wasn't sure what your relation to Branden was; I figured you were an
intern at his new job. (your original mail was long, much formatting, and
I read it in a small, badly fonted win terminal, in a glare, which was
difficult.)
I now
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 10:57:10PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> * Robert Braddock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001114 22:17]:
> > > Tenth idea -- the log file mentions the machine hasn't mtrr support.
> > > Perhaps this needs to be enabled in your kernel?
> >
> > What's MTRR anyway? I haven't changed the
* Robert Braddock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001114 22:17]:
> > Tenth idea -- the log file mentions the machine hasn't mtrr support.
> > Perhaps this needs to be enabled in your kernel?
>
> What's MTRR anyway? I haven't changed the kernel in a while, but I'll look
> for that when I recompile it out of d
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 09:00:43PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> Ok, first, try uncommenting the misc fontpath -- many programs require
> fonts found in misc, I think, and maybe this will fix the problem.
Well, it hangs before it starts a client, but I did have the fonts
uncommented before. I've tri
27 matches
Mail list logo
